메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국동북아학회 한국동북아논총 한국동북아논총 제84호
발행연도
2017.9
수록면
45 - 69 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
States must change some of basic institutions and rules to adopt a much more global and long-term approach to climate change. States are most important actor in international climate negotiations. As U.S. is a hegemonic state and world’s second largest emitter of greenhouse gases, it has the potential to influence the success and failure of international climate regime. And its failure to participate in joint efforts is likely to prevent other states from acting on their own interests. Though, in the post-cold war era, there is a greater danger of shift to unilateralism, it has been part of U.S. international environmental policy. U.S. has pursued multilateral environmental regimes and unilateral responses. The strengthening of hegemony does not determine whether the U.S. will promote or oppose the creation of international climate regimes. At times, the U.S. government has used its economic strength and political influence to promote global environmental objectives. On other occasions, it has acted as a veto power, blocking progress toward multilateral policy making. There is no simple and straightforward correlation between U.S. hegemonic position and the direction and evolution of its international climate policy. At the national level, domestic groups pressure U.S. government to adopt policies they support, while it seek enlargement of power by constructing coalitions with its social groups. At the international level, U.S. government want to satisfy domestic pressures, while limiting any negative consequences from international climate politics. In the process of interaction between domestic politics and international relations, the international climate policy of U.S government was made largely in response to domestic politics. Domestic factors play a key role in determining international climate policy, more so than in many other foreign policy arenas. The unilateralism and diversity of U.S. international climate policy to a large extent reflect the interplay among domestic social groups and the fragmented nature of its political system. The preferences of domestic actors and the distribution of domestic coalitions are very important factors in analysing U.S. international climate policy.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-034-002211615