메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박파랑 (이화여자대학교)
저널정보
한국미술연구소 미술사논단 美術史論壇 第44號
발행연도
2017.6
수록면
35 - 58 (24page)
DOI
10.14380/AHF.2017.44.35

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The view of xieyi style, a concept derived from literati painting, as a principle and form of abstract spirit inherent to ink painting, in connection with Western abstract art, goes back as far as 1929 in Korean art. Western-style artists who had studied in Japan, such as Kim Yong-jun and Sim Yeong-seop, tied the work of postimpressionist artists such as Cézanne and Van Gogh with that of other artists such as Matisse, Rouault and Kandinsky together under the term “expressionism.” They defined subjective, symbolic expression of the artist’s inner side through bold formal transformations and free line compositions, going beyond realistic mimesis, as “expressive principles of ink painting.” In the late 1930s, ink painter Kim Yeong-gi posited that the expressionist nature of Western art was the same as xieyi, the literati painting principle that emphasized the same subjective expression and inner emotions through bold brush techniques. Kim branded Western abstract art a return to an East Asian-style spirit, thereby asserting the superiority of East Asian spirit.
Later, in the 1950s, it was Lee Ung-no who established a link between xieyi and abstract styles in East Asian painting. Before the widespread acceptance of Western abstract art in the 1950s, xieyi was merely expressed as an emphasis on free excitement of the artist, within the genres and styles of traditional literati painting. This was inherently embodied in traditional style, as evidenced by various conceptual values of East Asian painting including shuhua yizhi (書畵一致) and qiyun shengdong (氣韻生動).
This tells us that simply lumping together the East Asian abstractionism that appeared in the 1950s and later became established as a distinct style as an “inherent developmental style,” based on a theoretical interpretation of xieyi, not only shows a lack of understanding of historical context but has the potential to be misunderstanding or misleading by reconstituting the abstractionism as a direct projection of today’s perspectives.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 1929년 한국 서양화단: 아세아주의 미술론과 일본
Ⅲ. 1939년 한국 동양화단 : 사의적 문인화와 중국
Ⅳ. 1930-40년대 한국 동양화단 : 문인화와 ‘사의’의 조형적 표현
Ⅴ. 한국 동양화단의 사의 개념과 서구추상의 수용
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-650-001177705