지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The study focuses on the ‘independent issue of Corea and the international relations under the situations of the Sino-Japanese War. During the War, ‘the independence of Corea’, regardless of sovereignty and territorial integrity as an independent nation, was under the restrictions of the structure of strategic interest for the Great Powers including Japan and China. Japan’s exclusive ambition over the Korean Peninsula, which pretended to be ‘independence of Corea’, consistently revealed during the war period. China, on the other hand, wanted to prevent the Korean Peninsula from the falling into the hands of the Japanese as a whole, leaning on the intervention of the Powers. The ambiguous attitudes of China between ‘independence of Corea’ and suzerainty were one of the major factors in prolonging the war and delaying the peace negotiations.
Of the Powers with concerns in East Asia, the United States hoped to use Japan to terminate China’s suzerainty over Corea, open the door to Chinese trade and investment and weaken the influence of Britain and Russia in East Asia. Britain and Russia also checked each other because the partner country might try to expand its power alone in the Korean Peninsula. British Lord Kimberley’s ‘common intervention’ by the powers was a way to prevent Russian monopoly on the Korean Peninsula, and to avoid ‘armed intervention’. His proposals of ‘joint occupation of Corea’ and ‘separate Protection’ by China and Japan came from a large frame to control Russia, but as a result, it became a guideline to Japan to open the war. Since the beginning of October in 1894, when the war spread to mainland China, Kimberley’s proposal, ‘independence of Corea guaranteed by the Powers’, was intended to exclude any power’s monopolies on the Korean peninsula including victorious Japan. Russia also hoped to prevent the subjugation of Corea by any power and adopt a wait-and-see policy at least until the completion of the Trans-Siberian Railway. But as soon as Japan’s crucial victory threatened the ‘independence of Corea and of China’, Russia will be involved actively the issue through the Triple Intervention in April 1895.
Of the Powers with concerns in East Asia, the United States hoped to use Japan to terminate China’s suzerainty over Corea, open the door to Chinese trade and investment and weaken the influence of Britain and Russia in East Asia. Britain and Russia also checked each other because the partner country might try to expand its power alone in the Korean Peninsula. British Lord Kimberley’s ‘common intervention’ by the powers was a way to prevent Russian monopoly on the Korean Peninsula, and to avoid ‘armed intervention’. His proposals of ‘joint occupation of Corea’ and ‘separate Protection’ by China and Japan came from a large frame to control Russia, but as a result, it became a guideline to Japan to open the war. Since the beginning of October in 1894, when the war spread to mainland China, Kimberley’s proposal, ‘independence of Corea guaranteed by the Powers’, was intended to exclude any power’s monopolies on the Korean peninsula including victorious Japan. Russia also hoped to prevent the subjugation of Corea by any power and adopt a wait-and-see policy at least until the completion of the Trans-Siberian Railway. But as soon as Japan’s crucial victory threatened the ‘independence of Corea and of China’, Russia will be involved actively the issue through the Triple Intervention in April 1895.
#청일전쟁
#조선의 독립
#불개입
#열강의 공동 개입
#한반도 공동 점령
#보호령
#열강이 보장하는 조선의 독립
#거중조정
#무장 개입
#호의적 중립
#The Sino-Japanese War
#independence of Corea
#non-intervention
#common intervention by the powers
#joint occupation of Corea
#separate Protectorate
#good offices
#armed intervention
#independence of Corea guaranteed by the Powers
#benevolent Neutrality
목차
1. 머리말
2. 일본의 현상(Status Quo) 변경 시도와 열강의 상호 견제
3. 청일 양군의 ‘한반도 공동점령(joint occupation of Corea)’ 및 ‘보호령(seperate Protectorate)’안과 일본의 개전
4. 한반도에서의 패전과 리훙장이 제기한 ‘조선의 독립’
5. 중국 본토로의 전선확대와 ‘열강이 보장하는 조선의 독립(independence of Corea guaranteed by Powers)’
6. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (125)
참고문헌 신청
[기타자료] - / / No.313, O’Conor to Kimberley, 1894.6.24., Inclosure 2 in No.313, Memorandum by Mr. Drummond, 1894.6.15
[단행본] - Park Il-Keun / 1983 / Anglo-American Chinese Diplomatic Materials Relating to Korea, 1887-1897 / 부산대학교 중국문제연구소
[기타자료] - / 1894 / No.405, O’Conor to Kimberley, Inclosure 2 in 405 / BDA : 240 ~ 242
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 고야쓰 노부쿠니 / 2006 / 민비암살이란 무엇인가 / 역사학보 (190)
[단행본] - 森山茂德 / 1994 / 청일전쟁의 재조명 / 한림대학교 아시아문화연구소 : 195 ~
[단행본] - Park Il-Keun / 1983 / Anglo-American Chinese Diplomatic Materials Relating to Korea, 1887-1897 / 부산대학교 중국문제연구소
[기타자료] - / 1894 / No.405, O’Conor to Kimberley, Inclosure 2 in 405 / BDA : 240 ~ 242
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 고야쓰 노부쿠니 / 2006 / 민비암살이란 무엇인가 / 역사학보 (190)
[단행본] - 森山茂德 / 1994 / 청일전쟁의 재조명 / 한림대학교 아시아문화연구소 : 195 ~
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
예수회의 적응주의 선교 정책과 뒤 알드의 『朝鮮傳(Kingdom of Corea)』
문화역사지리
2018 .12
-
19세기 말 영국 외교관 칼스(W. R. Carles)가 수집한 한반도 지역정보의 분석- 『조선풍물지(LifeinCorea)』를 중심으로 -
문화역사지리
2016 .01
-
고등학교 『동아시아사』 교과서의 청일전쟁 서술체제와 내용 분석
인격교육
2024 .08
-
동아시아 세력변화를 통해 본 청일전쟁의 지정학적 기원 ? 청과 러시아, 일본과의 영토조약을 중심으로 -
중국지역연구
2021 .11
-
Crecimiento económico y emisiones de CO2 en Corea del Sur y México : estrategias verdes para crecer y reducir la contaminación en el siglo XXI
이베로아메리카
2016 .12
-
봉오동ㆍ청산리 독립전쟁의 군사사학적 고찰
한국군사학논총
2021 .01
-
Iberian Sources on the Imjin War: The Relação do fim e remate que teve a guerra da Corea (1599)
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2023 .05
-
서양인이 본 청일전쟁(1894-1895) - 서양 언론 보도를 중심으로
동학학보
2016 .01
-
푸틴-아베 재집권(2012)이후 러·일 관계변화 동인과 전략적 함의
국가안보와 전략
2017 .01
-
19세기 말 朝淸 「奉天邊民交易章程」의 역사적 의의(1882-1883) - 章程의 協商過程과 條款에 대한 분석을 중심으로 -
중국학보
2020 .01
-
산업협력 기반 한반도경제정책의 구상
사회경제평론
2018 .01
-
청·일전쟁의 開戰원인과 청과 일본의 군사전략 비교연구
한국동북아논총
2015 .12
-
The China Problem in Postwar Japan: Japanese National Identity and Sino-Japanese Relations.
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2015 .01
-
Russia, China and the Korean Peninsula: A Post-Ukraine Assessment
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2015 .01
-
청일전쟁 · 러일전쟁-한반도에서 벌어진 국제전을 바라보는 한국학계의 시각
군사
2016 .09
-
China’s and Russia’s Sharp Power and Implications
IFANS FOCUS
2018 .05
-
Current State of and Prospects for Russia-Japan Relations
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .11
-
Foreign Policy Goals of Russia’s Increasing Intervention in Overseas Crises
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2016 .12
-
미국과 중국의 동북아 정책 분석 : 역사와 현재 국제 현상을 중심으로
평화학연구
2025 .03
-
Russia’s Relations with China Amidst US-China-Russia Strategic Competition
[KIEP] World Economy Brief
2023 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0