지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 효원사학회 역사와 세계 역사와 세계 제46집
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 135 - 170 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.17857/hw.2014.12.46.135
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The First Sino-Japanese War was an important turning point incident for China`s early modern history. The Middle School`s Chinese History textbook, published by the People`s Education Press in 1956, mentions that the USA and Japan invaded Korea, and that under the support of USA, Japan staged war against China. It also says that, although the Qing troops fought bravely, Qing was defeated in the war because LiHongzhang (李鴻章) of the Qing government implemented a policy of selling the country and heavily depended on foreign countries. In addition, published after the People`s Republic of China was established, the history textbook deleted the prior textbooks` statement that Joseon was a Chinese territory.
The textbook, published in 1979, mentions that, from the viewpoint of struggle of classes, with regard to the Japanese aggression, the Qing government`s internal conflict and efforts to cope with the war were seen as negative, and that some troops` passive anti-war attitudes, some troops` patriotic anti-war movements, and other internal conflicts within China were explained in detail.
The 1992 history textbook of Middle School gives a detailed explanation of the activities of Zuobaogui(左寶貴) and Dengshichang(鄧世昌) and other patriotic troops, but does not nearly describe figures who played negative roles in the war.
The current history textbook of Middle School simplified the First Sino-Japanese War and the Treaty of Shimonoseki into a structure of Japanese aggression vs. the anti-aggression struggle of patriotic troops and populace, and emphasized patriotism.
The textbook, published in 1979, mentions that, from the viewpoint of struggle of classes, with regard to the Japanese aggression, the Qing government`s internal conflict and efforts to cope with the war were seen as negative, and that some troops` passive anti-war attitudes, some troops` patriotic anti-war movements, and other internal conflicts within China were explained in detail.
The 1992 history textbook of Middle School gives a detailed explanation of the activities of Zuobaogui(左寶貴) and Dengshichang(鄧世昌) and other patriotic troops, but does not nearly describe figures who played negative roles in the war.
The current history textbook of Middle School simplified the First Sino-Japanese War and the Treaty of Shimonoseki into a structure of Japanese aggression vs. the anti-aggression struggle of patriotic troops and populace, and emphasized patriotism.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 중화인민공화국 성립 초기의 교과서 서술
Ⅱ. 개혁개방 이후 청일전쟁서술
Ⅲ. 현행 중학교 역사교과서
맺음말
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0