지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.7
- 수록면
- 37 - 87 (51page)
- DOI
- 10.30532/mce.2015.07.8.1.37
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Samuel Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations became the influential theory to explain and predict the violence phenomena of the modern times. But as the title ‘The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of Global Order’ says, it was written to reformulate the foreign policies of Western countries after the collapse of Soviet Union. When the bipolar system left from the stage of history in 1990, two kinds of ideas concerning about the future were raised. One of them was the endof-history thesis by Francis Fukuyama, based on the concept of Hegelian History(1992), and the other was Samuel Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations. The thesis of Francis Fukuyama was so optimistic about the post-Soviet era that the future of human society would be full of peace and democracy. But the Huntington’s thesis was totally different. He said that the clash of civilizations would dominate global politics and the fault lines between civilizations would be the battle lines of the future. His thesis obtained the support and agreement from the international community of scholars, politicians and from the public opinions. And it became the main frame of American foreign policies, especially after 9·11. Furthermore it is more reasonable to say that Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations became the ideological tools to grant the legitimacy to the US invasion of Iraq in 2003.
This paper deals with this clash of civilizations thesis as the ideological framework for US foreign policies. Huntington’s thesis is not a scientific theory but an ideological construction for the ‘Remaking of Global Order’. Huntington said that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world would not be primarily ideological or primarily economic, but the great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict would be cultural. But it is not true. The fundamental source of conflict is still political and economic problems. A series of ‘Spring’ events in the Middle East and ISIS are closely associated with the crisis of World Capitalist System. Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations conceals the essence of modern violence phenomena and becomes the main causes of contemporary problems of the Middle East. The US invasion of Iraq in 2003 was supported by the clash of civilizations thesis and the unified national system of Hussein’s Iraq was collapsed by the sectarian violence and terror among Shia, Sunni and Kurds. Besides Islamic State established itself permanently as a state or quasi-state in the heart of the Middle East and actively uses the rhetoric of the upside-down Clash of Civilizations for the new Islamic Caliphate. Therefore the relationship between US and Islamic Jihadists seems to be adversarial symbiosis.
Unlike the approach of the conflicting civilizations, this paper deals with the modern violence phenomena from the viewpoint of the crisis of world capitalist system. Bretton Woods system dissolved between 1968 and 1973. The U.S. dollar’s fixed value against gold became free from the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates. As a result, the inflation becomes inevitably due to the expansion of dollar liquidity, the high unemployment rate threatens the minimum conditions of survival. This contradiction was exploded as the global financial crisis in 2008. And the ‘Spring’ events in the Middle East and ISIS are closely related to the crisis of modern world system. In this context the clash of civilizations thesis is a kind of ideological camouflage to cover the essence of the problem.
This paper deals with this clash of civilizations thesis as the ideological framework for US foreign policies. Huntington’s thesis is not a scientific theory but an ideological construction for the ‘Remaking of Global Order’. Huntington said that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world would not be primarily ideological or primarily economic, but the great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict would be cultural. But it is not true. The fundamental source of conflict is still political and economic problems. A series of ‘Spring’ events in the Middle East and ISIS are closely associated with the crisis of World Capitalist System. Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations conceals the essence of modern violence phenomena and becomes the main causes of contemporary problems of the Middle East. The US invasion of Iraq in 2003 was supported by the clash of civilizations thesis and the unified national system of Hussein’s Iraq was collapsed by the sectarian violence and terror among Shia, Sunni and Kurds. Besides Islamic State established itself permanently as a state or quasi-state in the heart of the Middle East and actively uses the rhetoric of the upside-down Clash of Civilizations for the new Islamic Caliphate. Therefore the relationship between US and Islamic Jihadists seems to be adversarial symbiosis.
Unlike the approach of the conflicting civilizations, this paper deals with the modern violence phenomena from the viewpoint of the crisis of world capitalist system. Bretton Woods system dissolved between 1968 and 1973. The U.S. dollar’s fixed value against gold became free from the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates. As a result, the inflation becomes inevitably due to the expansion of dollar liquidity, the high unemployment rate threatens the minimum conditions of survival. This contradiction was exploded as the global financial crisis in 2008. And the ‘Spring’ events in the Middle East and ISIS are closely related to the crisis of modern world system. In this context the clash of civilizations thesis is a kind of ideological camouflage to cover the essence of the problem.
목차
ABSTRACT
I. 서론
II. 문명충돌론의 이데올로기적 성격
III. 문명충돌론이 만든 결과들
IV. 글로벌 금융 자본주의 체제와 중동
V. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Comparative Study of Several Issues Between the Indus Civilization and the Ancient Shu Civilization
중국어문학논집
2015 .06
-
Word2Vec 분석을 통한 근대 계몽기 잡지에서의 ‘문명(文明)’의 시기별 지형도
개념과 소통
2020 .01
-
일본 외유기(1901~1905) 孫秉熙의 ‘文明’ 개념과 文明論
대동문화연구
2022 .03
-
현대문명의 위기와 후천개벽 사상의 포스트모던적 함의
仙道文化
2020 .01
-
강증산의 ‘개벽’과 새로운 문명
대순사상논총
2019 .01
-
협력문명의 사회적 기원―협력공동체의 형성과 해체에 관한 문명사적 탐색―
민족문화연구
2020 .01
-
자유주의 문명의 밖에서- 간디에서 이토를 넘어 롤즈까지 -
日本思想
2015 .01
-
동아시아공동체: 문명대안론- 문명적 정위를 중심으로 -
동서철학연구
2018 .01
-
반목과 충돌의 시대 속의 이슬람 선교
Muslim-Christian Encounter
2015 .07
-
개인 경험의 종교성과 현대 정신문명의 위기: 윌리엄 제임스의 종교적 경험의 다양성과 ｢믿으려는 의지｣를 중심으로
문학과 종교
2024 .09
-
Oedipus in Korea: Echoes of Social Clashes in the Legends of Silla
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2017 .12
-
기후위기, 새로운 문명의 전환 앞에서
한국여성신학
2021 .07
-
대한제국 전기 언론계의 문명관 연구
한국사상사학
2024 .04
-
안동지역 근대교육의 전개양상 - 협동학교(協東學校)를 중심으로
한국학연구
2021 .12
-
중앙아시아 이슬람 금융의 특징에 대한 연구
슬라브학보
2019 .06
-
Cultural Influence on the Resolution of Implicature Clash
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .12
-
동아시아 문명공동체 로드맵 : 역내 인문ㆍ종교ㆍ문화예술 네트워크 제안
양명학
2018 .08
-
1920년대 문명·문화 개념의 교차
개념과 소통
2019 .01
-
파리테러 사건을 계기로 본 글로벌 사회의 종교갈등
신학과 사회
2016 .01
-
시교육과 문명 인식의 문제
한국문예비평연구
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-280-000871455