지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines how modern Korean intellectuals perceive Baikal in relation to the origin of the Korean race and culture.
Baikal is always included when discussing where the Korean race came from and which region is related to a certain part of the Korean culture. Although Central Asia, Altai or Siberia are included and commonly called the northern region according to the writer, in many cases, Baikal is mentioned as the center. It is difficult to specify since when the Korean intellectuals had this notion but it can at least be confirmed that the so-called Baikal theory appeared in the early 20th century. During the 20th century and even at present, Baikal is discussed as the land from which the Korean race or culture originated.
Although some of these such arguments are acceptable, there are many that are hard to agree with. There are many cases in which the external argument looks to be acceptable but the contents are severely lacking in academic basis. This is caused by the prejudice of the writers, though it is also related to the characteristic of the topic of a race’s origin. With this in mind, the Baikal theory that has been discussed until the present was reexamined to analyze the validity of the argument and the reasons for its emergence.
First, the perception of Baikal of the Korean intellectuals who visited Baikal in the early 20th century, which was when the Baikal theory first appeared, and those who visited the region in the modern age was reviewed, and based on this, it was verified whether Baikal was where the Korean race and culture originated. As a result, the following conclusion was reached.
The Baikal theory, in which the Korean race and culture are said to have originated from Baikal, basically has its roots in the northen region theory, where the Korean race and culture are said to have originated from the northern region. Intellectuals have been explaining the Korean race and culture in relation to the northern region since the start of the 20th century. Nevertheless, the northern region perceived by our past intellectuals is ambiguous. North and south Manchuria, inner and outer Mongolia, far east Maritime Province, Siberia and the Altaic region were all commonly called the northern region. Baikal is located within this united group of the northern region, and modern scholars and writers also include Manchuria, Siberia and even Mongolia when discussing Baikal. The conclusion is that the northern region, which was perceived as the origin of the Korean race and culture for more than a century and the scope of which was ambiguously defined, changed to Baikal after the 1990s and Baikal is currently understood as the region from which the Korean race and culture originated.
Baikal is always included when discussing where the Korean race came from and which region is related to a certain part of the Korean culture. Although Central Asia, Altai or Siberia are included and commonly called the northern region according to the writer, in many cases, Baikal is mentioned as the center. It is difficult to specify since when the Korean intellectuals had this notion but it can at least be confirmed that the so-called Baikal theory appeared in the early 20th century. During the 20th century and even at present, Baikal is discussed as the land from which the Korean race or culture originated.
Although some of these such arguments are acceptable, there are many that are hard to agree with. There are many cases in which the external argument looks to be acceptable but the contents are severely lacking in academic basis. This is caused by the prejudice of the writers, though it is also related to the characteristic of the topic of a race’s origin. With this in mind, the Baikal theory that has been discussed until the present was reexamined to analyze the validity of the argument and the reasons for its emergence.
First, the perception of Baikal of the Korean intellectuals who visited Baikal in the early 20th century, which was when the Baikal theory first appeared, and those who visited the region in the modern age was reviewed, and based on this, it was verified whether Baikal was where the Korean race and culture originated. As a result, the following conclusion was reached.
The Baikal theory, in which the Korean race and culture are said to have originated from Baikal, basically has its roots in the northen region theory, where the Korean race and culture are said to have originated from the northern region. Intellectuals have been explaining the Korean race and culture in relation to the northern region since the start of the 20th century. Nevertheless, the northern region perceived by our past intellectuals is ambiguous. North and south Manchuria, inner and outer Mongolia, far east Maritime Province, Siberia and the Altaic region were all commonly called the northern region. Baikal is located within this united group of the northern region, and modern scholars and writers also include Manchuria, Siberia and even Mongolia when discussing Baikal. The conclusion is that the northern region, which was perceived as the origin of the Korean race and culture for more than a century and the scope of which was ambiguously defined, changed to Baikal after the 1990s and Baikal is currently understood as the region from which the Korean race and culture originated.
목차
1. 서론
2. 바이칼을 다녀 온 사람들
3. 현대의 방문자들
4. 바이칼은 한국인과 한국문화의 시원지인가?
5. 결론 -북방으로 뭉뚱그려진 바이칼-
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
발렌틴 라스푸틴과 박범신의 작품에서 자연 공간과 문학 공간으로서의 바이칼 : 단편 소설을 중심으로
문학과환경
2019 .03
-
한국인 기원에 관한 최신 연구성과와 전망 - 북방기원설을 중심으로
유라시아문화
2025 .02
-
Evaluation of genetic potential of Bivoltine silkworm race for breeding programme in Vietnam
International Journal of Industrial Entomology
2021 .12
-
은유 분석을 통해 본 예비한국어교사들의 한국문화・한국문화교육에 대한 인식 연구
언어학 연구
2021 .04
-
Exclusive Pakkey and Multidimensionality
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2022 .11
-
1910년대 미국의 한국에 대한 인식과 3.1운동에 대한 반응
역사와실학
2021 .04
-
The magnitude of articulatory gestures for the glide /w/ in Korean: Implications for the phonological representation of /w/
음성음운형태론연구
2020 .12
-
Exhaustivity of –(n)un in Korean
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2017 .06
-
재일동포사회를 통해서 본 한국다문화사회의 비판적 고찰
일본문화학보
2016 .02
-
윤동주의 탄식시 연구
한국시학연구
2015 .08
-
역-형성되는 인종의 실재성과 SF 장르 속의 포스트휴먼 혼종성
새한영어영문학
2018 .11
-
한국어 문화와 한국 문화의 관계 설정
한국초등국어교육
2016 .01
-
Between East Asia and Russia: Il’ya Levitov's Conception of “Yellow Russia” (Zheltaya Rossiya) at the Turn of the Twentieth Century
슬라브硏究
2015 .01
-
해외 한국학 연구의 새로운 시각과 연구 지평의 확대
사림
2023 .01
-
고등학교 한국사 교과서의 ‘북벌론’ 서사 분석
역사교육논집
2024 .06
-
신석기시대 바이칼과 내몽골~길림 지역의 망상문토기 유형 비교고찰
호서고고학
2020 .01
-
혼혈아 외부화 프로세스와 대중문화― 경제성장기 일본사회의 혼혈아 표상
대동문화연구
2021 .09
-
V. 라스푸틴의 눈에 비친 현대 러시아와 시베리아의 위기
노어노문학
2017 .03
-
미국 흑인문학의 ‘인종 가로지르기’: 미국인 되기의 정치학과 백인 되지 않기의 윤리학
미국소설
2016 .07
-
학습자 인식을 고려한 한국 문화 교육 연구 - 미국 미시시피 대학교 문화 수업 사례를 중심으로 -
언어와 문화
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-380-002116461