지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.10
- 수록면
- 1 - 118 (118page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research attempted to derive the problems through the analysis of the actual state of local governments’ nontax revenue and operations of the imposition and collection systems of the charge system and, based on this, to prepare the improvement plan for the charge system to expand local nontax revenue.
The problems with local governments’ charge operation are as follows. First, when the financial revenue collected from the charge is paid, it should be closely connected with the reasons for charge imposition. However, the causal relationship between the charge imposition purposes and the use of the charge is insufficiently connected. Second, the current structure is such that the laws regarding the matters of overall operation of the charge system such as the calculation and operation of the charge are enacted and managed mainly for the central government. Accordingly, despite the fact that local governments are in charge of actual operation business of the charge, the collected charge does not contribute much to the local governments. Third, the regulations related to the imposition, collection, distribution systems of the charge are not established systematically. Fourth, local governments’ collection and delivery rate is very low. In 2013, 87.4% of the total charge belonged to the central governments’ financial resources, whereas only 9.3% belonged to local governments. Fifth, the size of the local governments’ charge differs greatly depending on the regions, and particularly, the size of the charge of the local governments whose local finance size is big is found to be big, showing that the gap between the rich and the poor in local governments’ financial operation is getting wider.
The improvement plans for efficient operation of the charge system are as follows. First, the regulations related to the charge need to be improved. In the law on which the charge is based, the regulations for securing the basic principles of the imposition of the charge such as ‘the legitimacy of the purpose of establishment’ of the charge, ‘securing fairness and transparency’, and ‘the prohibition of dual imposition’, and the more concrete and clearer regulations such as imposition requirements, calculation criteria, and calculation methods should be prepared. Second, in order for the charge system to be operated in line with original purposes, the charge imposition and distribution system should be improved. Third, considering that local governments actually bear the burden of charge, the charge distribution method needs to be improved so that it can make contributions to secure local governments’ finances. Fourth, gathering the opinions of interest parties in the process of the charge imposition needs to be strengthened.
The problems with local governments’ charge operation are as follows. First, when the financial revenue collected from the charge is paid, it should be closely connected with the reasons for charge imposition. However, the causal relationship between the charge imposition purposes and the use of the charge is insufficiently connected. Second, the current structure is such that the laws regarding the matters of overall operation of the charge system such as the calculation and operation of the charge are enacted and managed mainly for the central government. Accordingly, despite the fact that local governments are in charge of actual operation business of the charge, the collected charge does not contribute much to the local governments. Third, the regulations related to the imposition, collection, distribution systems of the charge are not established systematically. Fourth, local governments’ collection and delivery rate is very low. In 2013, 87.4% of the total charge belonged to the central governments’ financial resources, whereas only 9.3% belonged to local governments. Fifth, the size of the local governments’ charge differs greatly depending on the regions, and particularly, the size of the charge of the local governments whose local finance size is big is found to be big, showing that the gap between the rich and the poor in local governments’ financial operation is getting wider.
The improvement plans for efficient operation of the charge system are as follows. First, the regulations related to the charge need to be improved. In the law on which the charge is based, the regulations for securing the basic principles of the imposition of the charge such as ‘the legitimacy of the purpose of establishment’ of the charge, ‘securing fairness and transparency’, and ‘the prohibition of dual imposition’, and the more concrete and clearer regulations such as imposition requirements, calculation criteria, and calculation methods should be prepared. Second, in order for the charge system to be operated in line with original purposes, the charge imposition and distribution system should be improved. Third, considering that local governments actually bear the burden of charge, the charge distribution method needs to be improved so that it can make contributions to secure local governments’ finances. Fourth, gathering the opinions of interest parties in the process of the charge imposition needs to be strengthened.
목차
[표지]
[연구요약]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
제1절 연구배경 및 목적
제2절 연구범위 및 방법
[제2장 부담금제도에 대한 이론적 고찰]
제1절 지방세외수입
제2절 부담금 제도
[제3장 지방자치단체 부담금의 구조 및 운영체계]
제1절 지방자치단체 부담금제도의 구조 및 현황
제2절 지방자치단체 부담금의 부과 및 징수체계
[제4장 지방자치단체 부담금의 운영 실태 분석]
제1절 지방자치단체 부담금의 운영 실태
제2절 경기도 부담금의 운영 실태
[제5장 부담금 제도의 문제점 및 개선방안]
제1절 지방자치단체 부담금 제도의 특징 및 문제점
제2절 지방자치단체 부담금 제도의 개선방안
[제6장 결론 및 정책제언]
제1절 연구결과의 요약
제2절 정책건의
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
개발부담금의 우선징수권과 재산권 ― 헌재 2016. 6. 30. 2013헌바191등에 대한 평석 ―
인권법평론
2022 .03
-
개발제한구역 보전부담금 징수제도 개선방안
정책연구
2017 .06
-
지방부담금 제도 도입을 위한 시론적 연구: 독일 사례의 시사점
예산정책연구
2023 .03
-
지역단위 수요 예측에 기반한 전기차 충전인프라 구축 방안 연구: 머신러닝기반 공간분포 예측 모형을 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2021 .06
-
온라인 음식배달 플랫폼의 배달요금 부과정책이 소비자의 공정성 지각에 미치는 영향
유통경영학회지
2022 .02
-
개발부담금 부과·징수 업무처리규정의 적법성 검토
일감부동산법학
2023 .05
-
추진장약 수락시험의 시험단계 통합 연구
한국군사과학기술학회지
2016 .01
-
지방부담금 신설 권한 창설에 관한 연구
인문사회 21
2023 .04
-
충전소에서의 대기시간을 고려한 전기차량의 경로 최적화 문제에서 강화학습 기법의 적용 방안 연구
경영과학
2023 .12
-
재건축 부담금의 헌법적 검토
부동산법학
2018 .01
-
전기자동차 충전시설의 구축확대를 위한 법적 문제
중앙법학
2016 .09
-
개발부담금의 법적 쟁점 및 그 개선방안에 관한 연구 - 조합원의 제2차 납부의무를 중심으로 -
부동산학보
2018 .01
-
재건축부담금의 위헌성에 대한 검토
고려법학
2020 .01
-
항공사서비스 추가요금 수용여부가 부정적 감정과고객행동에 미치는 영향
관광경영연구
2018 .01
-
부담금의 정당성 심사 - 물이용부담금 합헌결정(2018헌바425)에 대한 평석 -
공법학연구
2021 .02
-
「부담금관리기본법」을 위반하여 설치된 부담금의 효력 - 대상판결 : 대법원 2014. 1. 29. 선고 2013다25927,25934 판결 -
행정판례연구
2017 .12
-
인천국제공항의 수입항공화물에 대한 수요의 결정요인과 탄력성 연구
창조와 혁신
2021 .01
-
취약계층에 대한 금전납부의무 완화를 위한 법령정비방안 연구
법학연구
2024 .01
-
징수교부금 지급기준의 적정성 제고방안: 지방이 위임 징수하는 환경 관련 부담금을 중심으로
한국지방재정논집
2021 .08
-
개발부담금의 법적 성격에 관한 헌법재판소 판례의 분석과 평가
강원법학
2020 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-309-002168539