지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
‘□ㅎ’ and ‘□ㅎ ’ are interpreted as ‘origin’ in the archaic word dictionaries, 『고어사전』 or 『이조어사전』 Although ‘□ㅎ’ and ‘□ㅎ’ are semantically related, the dictionary definitions of the two words need to be examined and interpreted differently.
The Chinese characters corresponding to ‘□ㅎ’ are two words; ‘奧’ and ‘源’. In the medieval language the distribution of these two words was fairly limited and commonly corresponded to Chinese characters ‘源’. Of course, ‘□ㅎ’ corresponding to the Chinese character ‘奧’ is universal on several bases : (1) The current ‘profoundity’ shows transition of the meaning in the late medieval language. In the Standard Korean Dictionary, ‘profoundity’ is defined as ‘to be profound and delicate’. Considering ‘深’ connects directly to ‘gipeun(기픈)’, ‘奧’ is derived basically from the meaning ‘the truth that leads to enlighten’. Consequently, the meaning of ‘truth’ is from ‘深’, and ‘truth’ itself corresponds to ‘delicate’. (2) Directly, ‘深奧’ means ‘immeasurable significance’. To be ‘immeasurable’ means something ‘profound’, so that it is difficult to measure the depth. (3) The use of ‘深奧’ in the 18th century is the same as the present use. By means of semantic transition already occurred, the independent function as a noun ‘奧’ has disappeared. ‘奧’ combined with ‘深’ is used to mean ‘profound and delicate’. It also appears in the form of the root preceding ‘-ㅎ-’. (4) Chinese characters ‘奧’ and ‘源’ corresponding to ‘□ㅎ’ have the common meaning, ‘deep’. But ‘□ㅎ’ corresponding to ‘源’ indicates a specific situation or object associated with ‘water(水本)’.
The Chinese character corresponding to ‘□ㅎ’ is limited only to ‘源’. ‘□ㅎ’ is described only as a qualifier, but not used as an independent element. There are some evidences for this: (1) For the meaning of ‘水泉本 ’ in the Chinese character ‘源’, its examples corresponding to the ‘웃듬 믈’ can be seen in 『두시언해』. This seems to be directly related to the basic meaning of ‘□ㅎ’. (2) Given that the example of the ‘□ㅎ’ are from 『두시언해』, the nature of the Chinese poetry can be revealed more accurately by examining the basic meaning of the word. (3) Even though ‘□ㅎ’ directly interpreted as ‘source’ looks awkward, it has a relevant source. That is, ‘□ㅎ’ can mean a variable of derivatives depending on the context.
In conclusion, ‘□ㅎ’ and ‘□ㅎ’ are synonymous by the meaning of ‘origin’ in the archaic word dictionaries. But this specific meaning is not used for the direct Chinese characters ‘根源’. In the Buddhist scriptures translation such as 『금강경삼가해』, 『영가집언해』,‘□ㅎ’ is not found, yet the Chinese character ‘根源’ is found frequently. In some cases, ‘□ㅎ’ appears with the Chinese character ‘根源’ in 『능엄경언해』. These will clearly not convey the same meaning. Moreover, since the Chinese character ‘根源’ was used earlier than ‘□ㅎ’, the sudden emergence of ‘□ㅎ’ is unique. Because ‘□ㅎ’ and ‘□ㅎ’ have a conceptual meaning in the Chinese characters, they do not link to a specific word. The conceptual meaning might have been useful for the Buddhist scriptures.
The Chinese characters corresponding to ‘□ㅎ’ are two words; ‘奧’ and ‘源’. In the medieval language the distribution of these two words was fairly limited and commonly corresponded to Chinese characters ‘源’. Of course, ‘□ㅎ’ corresponding to the Chinese character ‘奧’ is universal on several bases : (1) The current ‘profoundity’ shows transition of the meaning in the late medieval language. In the Standard Korean Dictionary, ‘profoundity’ is defined as ‘to be profound and delicate’. Considering ‘深’ connects directly to ‘gipeun(기픈)’, ‘奧’ is derived basically from the meaning ‘the truth that leads to enlighten’. Consequently, the meaning of ‘truth’ is from ‘深’, and ‘truth’ itself corresponds to ‘delicate’. (2) Directly, ‘深奧’ means ‘immeasurable significance’. To be ‘immeasurable’ means something ‘profound’, so that it is difficult to measure the depth. (3) The use of ‘深奧’ in the 18th century is the same as the present use. By means of semantic transition already occurred, the independent function as a noun ‘奧’ has disappeared. ‘奧’ combined with ‘深’ is used to mean ‘profound and delicate’. It also appears in the form of the root preceding ‘-ㅎ-’. (4) Chinese characters ‘奧’ and ‘源’ corresponding to ‘□ㅎ’ have the common meaning, ‘deep’. But ‘□ㅎ’ corresponding to ‘源’ indicates a specific situation or object associated with ‘water(水本)’.
The Chinese character corresponding to ‘□ㅎ’ is limited only to ‘源’. ‘□ㅎ’ is described only as a qualifier, but not used as an independent element. There are some evidences for this: (1) For the meaning of ‘水泉本 ’ in the Chinese character ‘源’, its examples corresponding to the ‘웃듬 믈’ can be seen in 『두시언해』. This seems to be directly related to the basic meaning of ‘□ㅎ’. (2) Given that the example of the ‘□ㅎ’ are from 『두시언해』, the nature of the Chinese poetry can be revealed more accurately by examining the basic meaning of the word. (3) Even though ‘□ㅎ’ directly interpreted as ‘source’ looks awkward, it has a relevant source. That is, ‘□ㅎ’ can mean a variable of derivatives depending on the context.
In conclusion, ‘□ㅎ’ and ‘□ㅎ’ are synonymous by the meaning of ‘origin’ in the archaic word dictionaries. But this specific meaning is not used for the direct Chinese characters ‘根源’. In the Buddhist scriptures translation such as 『금강경삼가해』, 『영가집언해』,‘□ㅎ’ is not found, yet the Chinese character ‘根源’ is found frequently. In some cases, ‘□ㅎ’ appears with the Chinese character ‘根源’ in 『능엄경언해』. These will clearly not convey the same meaning. Moreover, since the Chinese character ‘根源’ was used earlier than ‘□ㅎ’, the sudden emergence of ‘□ㅎ’ is unique. Because ‘□ㅎ’ and ‘□ㅎ’ have a conceptual meaning in the Chinese characters, they do not link to a specific word. The conceptual meaning might have been useful for the Buddhist scriptures.
목차
1. 서론
2. ‘□ㅎ’과 ‘□ㅎ’의 의미 특성
3. ‘□ㅎ’과 ‘□ㅎ’의 유의적 의미
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
佛經故事의 中國故事化 과정상의 특징 및 의의 : 佛經淵源類故事를 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2019 .04
-
唐代 官人의 佛經 傳播와 役割
중국사연구
2024 .01
-
딥러닝으로 불경 읽기 - Word2Vec으로 CBETA 불경 데이터 읽기
원불교사상과종교문화
2019 .06
-
조선 초 불경언해와 불자여성의 참여
禪文化硏究
2022 .12
-
한문 교과의 학습 요소로서 유의어 목록 선정 및 의미 차이 분석과 용례 제시
漢字漢文敎育
2015 .01
-
教育用基础汉字析议
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2021 .11
-
초급중국어 학습자의 한자 및 한자교육에 대한 인식조사 연구 - 전공계열별 분석을 중심으로 -
외국학연구
2020 .01
-
漢字․漢語 敎學方案 연구Ⅲ
중국문학연구
2022 .02
-
개념 연결 기반 한국어 유의어 교육 내용 연구 - 일본어권 고급 학습자를 중심으로 -
담화와인지
2024 .11
-
佛源 중국어 단어의 구조 분석
인문학연구
2022 .06
-
유의어의 의미 사용 양상 분석
언어학 연구
2017 .07
-
唐代 佛經의 유통과 확산 경로
중국고중세사연구
2023 .02
-
중국 인명용자 규범의 변화 양상 고찰
중국어문학논집
2018 .02
-
한국 한자와 중국 간화자의 학습 상관성에 관한 대학생 인식 및 학습 실태 연구 - 대학 학부생 중국어 학습자를 중심으로
중국문화연구
2019 .08
-
｢한국어 기초 사전｣의 유의어 제시 방식과학습 자료로서 개선할 점에 대하여
우리어문연구
2024 .09
-
중국인 한국어 학습자의 유의어 변별 양상에 대한 연구 - ‘부끄럽다’의 유의어를 중심으로 -
영주어문
2023 .02
-
淺談簡化字對漢字敎學的負面影響
중국언어연구
2018 .01
-
現代中國 인터넷 新字 小考
중국문화연구
2019 .11
-
근본불교 미술에 관한 문헌학적 고찰 - 율장과 아함경을 중심으로 -
인문연구
2021 .03
-
비교불교민속론의 비교기준에 관한 소고-마야부인 태몽이야기의 코끼리 모티브를 중심으로-
비교민속학
2023 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-810-002060078