지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.11
- 수록면
- 237 - 252 (16page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Cognitive linguistics, a school of linguistics which studies the relationship between universal principals of language and human cognitive rules, is able to reveal many linguistic phenomenon. The most important cognitive methods are metonymy and metaphor, which facilitate the development of lexical meaning from basic to extended and thus form a word’s polysemantic structure.
The Chinese‘嘴/口’and Korean ‘입/-구’ fundamentally represent human visual organ and this sense can be developed to other extended meanings via metonymy and metaphor, which are usually specific and abstract. The basis meanings of these two characters are similar. However, their meanings are developed in distinct ways. As a result, their extended meanings are not completely corresponding to each other.
In this essay, meanings from dictionaries and comparative and cognitive linguistics applied as background theories are used to analyze how fundamental meanings of Chinese ‘嘴/口’ and Korean ‘입/-구’ are projective from organ to other conceptual fields. The result shows that, the projective (extended) meanings are entirely different even both characters share the same basic meanings and developed direction. This is because the cross-domain mapping is not only influenced by internal linguistic factors, but also by external factors including human society, history, culture and etc. Nevertheless,no matter ‘嘴/口’ or ‘입/-구’, we can see that their cross-domain mapping all started from their fundamental meaning, turned the connotation from specific to abstract and developed through metonymy and metaphor.
The Chinese‘嘴/口’and Korean ‘입/-구’ fundamentally represent human visual organ and this sense can be developed to other extended meanings via metonymy and metaphor, which are usually specific and abstract. The basis meanings of these two characters are similar. However, their meanings are developed in distinct ways. As a result, their extended meanings are not completely corresponding to each other.
In this essay, meanings from dictionaries and comparative and cognitive linguistics applied as background theories are used to analyze how fundamental meanings of Chinese ‘嘴/口’ and Korean ‘입/-구’ are projective from organ to other conceptual fields. The result shows that, the projective (extended) meanings are entirely different even both characters share the same basic meanings and developed direction. This is because the cross-domain mapping is not only influenced by internal linguistic factors, but also by external factors including human society, history, culture and etc. Nevertheless,no matter ‘嘴/口’ or ‘입/-구’, we can see that their cross-domain mapping all started from their fundamental meaning, turned the connotation from specific to abstract and developed through metonymy and metaphor.
목차
1. 绪论
2. 具体概念
3. 抽象概念
4. 结论
【参考文献】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
从隐喻和转喻的角度分析现代汉语温度词热的词义引申现象
한국중국어교육학회 학술대회
2017 .06
-
论中国网络新四字成语形成中的认知机制
중국언어연구
2017 .04
-
현대중국어 ‘到’와 ‘到X’의 인지적 의미 분석
중국어교육과연구
2017 .12
-
事件域認知模型(ECM)視角下的反義複合詞內部語義屬性研究
중국언어연구
2022 .06
-
论汉韩空间维度词 “高” 和 “높다” 的跨域认知
어문론총
2015 .12
-
‘예정 목표’에서 ‘도달 목표’까지의 환유적 추론 과정 -‘往+NP+VP’ 구문을 중심으로
중국언어연구
2023 .04
-
한국신문 경제표제어에 반영된 개념적은유에 대하여 - "경제는 전쟁이다"를 중심으로
중국조선어문
2016 .01
-
은유의 조한번역에 대한 연구-연설문에 나타난 은유를 중심으로
중국조선어문
2021 .09
-
概念隐喻视角下舒婷诗歌中花类意象的认知解读
중국학
2021 .09
-
중한 반부패 신문기사텍스트의 인지의미론적대조연구
중국조선어문
2016 .09
-
개념적 혼성을 통해 보는 정서 한(恨)의 의미구성
중국조선어문
2020 .09
-
조사 ‘-로’의 다양한 의미확장과 그 기제
중국조선어문
2023 .01
-
清末口岸文人张赤山与 《海国妙喻》 研究
중국소설논총
2016 .12
-
中国外交话语的隐喻类别及其韩译方法研究
한중인문학연구
2022 .12
-
은유의 개념화 양상에 관한 연구
인문과학연구
2015 .03
-
환유의 경계설정에 관한 연구
영어영문학
2016 .08
-
대학생 별명에 나타난 은유와 환유의 유형과 특징
동남어문논집
2020 .01
-
Comparison Between CAUSE FOR EFFECT and EFFECT FOR CAUSE Metonymy in a Metonymy and Metaphor Continuum
언어과학
2019 .01
-
조류 은유의 의미 연구
한국학연구
2021 .03
-
당신의 신의를 내게 보여주시오!
한국여성신학
2018 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-820-001971707