메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영어영문학회 현대영어영문학 현대영어영문학 제59권 제1호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
341 - 368 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper interrogates how different Benjamin’s concept of sovereignty in The Origin of German Tragic Drama is from Schmitt’s one in Political Theology, under the assumption that their formation of sovereignty has developed from the interrelation with each other. Besides, it investigates Benjamin’s interpretation of Hamlet which he regards as belonging to the category of trauerspiel like German baroque drama, and Schmitt’s Hamlet or Hecuba in which Schmitt argues that Hamlet is the tragedy, not the trauerspiel. Thus, this paper makes an inquiry into how Benjamin and Schmitt’s evaluations of Hamlet as the trauerspiel and the tragedy are influenced by their different construction about the sovereignty. Benjamin, accentuating the sovereign’s undecidability, his creaturely status, and the melancholy, elucidates Hamlet’s characteristic as Trauerspiel as traced in the factors such as the ghost’ existence and Hamlet’s death. He also compliments Hamlet’s capacity to manifest the Christian sparks that German baroque drama cannot accomplish. On the other hand, Schmitt, elaborating the source of the tragic in Hamlet as found in ‘the Taboo of the Queen’ and ‘the Hamletization of the Avenger’, argues that these genuine intrusions, exceptional to the representation of historical facts in the art, elevates the play of Hamlet to the tragedy. Schmitt’s reasoning of Hamlet’s elevation to the tragedy has in common with his logic of the sovereignty when he states that the sovereign is the one that decides on the state of exception.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0