메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Ariane Murphy (University of Paris-Sorbonne and University College Dublin)
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제28권 제3호
발행연도
2015.12
수록면
279 - 304 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
William Butler Yeats read extensively the French Symbolists and the plays of the Belgian playwright, Maurice Maeterlinck, before there were widely known in the English and Irish literary world. However, Yeats made a point to distance himself from his increasingly famous contemporary playwright. A word returns repeatedly in Yeats’s criticism about Maeterlinck’s drama: his early plays lack “revery”. This paper examines how the concept of reverie drives the dramaturgy of two plays with similar stories, Deirdre by Yeats and Pelléas and Mélisande by Maeterlinck. On the one hand, in Yeats’s review of one of Maeterlinck’s plays, “revery” acquires the original meaning of a type of poetics that demands at the same time philosophical reflection and poetry. In Deirdre, deep thought expressed directly by the characters goes along with high language: at a time when the Irish stage represents Irish realist peasant drama, Yeats uses the same legends but in a poetic theatre. Maeterlinck’s characters do not express that type of “revery”: no philosophy, but pure emotions, no verse, but a language simplified to its core, leaving space for silence. On the other hand, reverie in its original definition, as a romantic state that lies between the unconsciousness of the dream and the consciousness of an awoken mind, plays an important part in both Pelléas and Deirdre. Maeterlinck’s characters do not act; they experience a ceaseless reverie that the spectator is made to experience with them at the sight of their reverie. Unlike Maeterlinck, Yeats does not show the moments of the reverie, but he explains the consequent thoughts of the characters’ reverie, the same way he does not represent the whole legend but he begins the action of Deirdre when the story is almost over. Yeats refuses both action and emotion: Yeats’s dramaturgy of reflection thus responds to Maeterlinck’s dramaturgy of experience.

목차

Ⅰ. Yeats, critic of Maeterlinck
Ⅱ. Confronting Pelléas et Mélisande and Deirdre
Ⅲ. “Revery”, between philosophy and poetry
Ⅳ. Reverie and revery: the dramaturgical effects of representing or not representing the characters’ reveries on stage
Ⅴ. Conclusion
Works Cited
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-842-002471862