지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제37호
- 발행연도
- 2015.10
- 수록면
- 58 - 83 (26page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2015.10.37.58
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This essay attempts to explore theological significance in the final verses of 2 Kings. The Jehioachin’s episode is mentioned just like an epilogue in the last stage at the compositive edition of Enneateuch (Genesis through Kings). It is, first of all, necessary that 2 Kings 25:27-30 should be analyzed historically and exegetically. I suggest that the final 4 verses imply canonical position of the present formation of the Hebrew Bible through Jehoiachin’s release.
The appearance of Jehoiachin and Evil-merodach in this episode shares a couple of common points with each other. Both of them, as a legitimate line of decent, ruled their own country shortly, but were estimated as a failure. For the Deuteronomic historian, Jehoiachin was indeed evil in the sight of the Lord (2 Kings 24:9). If so, how did he come to the conclusive part of the Primary History? The fact that Jehoiachin was restored by Evil-merodach of the Babylonian Emperor implies a positive message for the following reasons. First, Jehoiachin’s episode, as a model for Diaspora Novelle, reflected an open ending or positive closing of the Judaic way of canonical editing even in a hopeless time. Second, I try to propose that the use of an imperfect verb in the short paragraph can reach a climax in the whole chapter 25. From then on, Jehoiachin as a Davidic line will be restored and reign the Judah community.
Meanwhile when Enneateuch draws a conclusion as the Primary History, the Deuteronomist devised theological and rhetorical device, which is namely a dialect between discontinuity and continuity of the Kingdom of Judah. For Jehoiachin, though being a loser and a captive in Babylon, he could become a clue of a positive sign in the critical moment of Judah. Accordingly, by positioning Jehoiachin in the final step of Enneateuch, Deuteronomist could read into the possible continuity of Israel/Judah. Thus, Enneateuch could form a narrational structure of a long history from the beginning of the world to the last scene of Judah. If Genesis 2-3 reflects the Babylon exile of Israel, and the Book of Genesis is a prologue of the Primary History, the technique that closes the Enneateuch with the appearance of Jehoiachin is applicable to “an intelligible end”, that keeps not only theological consistence but also optimistic expectation from him.
The appearance of Jehoiachin and Evil-merodach in this episode shares a couple of common points with each other. Both of them, as a legitimate line of decent, ruled their own country shortly, but were estimated as a failure. For the Deuteronomic historian, Jehoiachin was indeed evil in the sight of the Lord (2 Kings 24:9). If so, how did he come to the conclusive part of the Primary History? The fact that Jehoiachin was restored by Evil-merodach of the Babylonian Emperor implies a positive message for the following reasons. First, Jehoiachin’s episode, as a model for Diaspora Novelle, reflected an open ending or positive closing of the Judaic way of canonical editing even in a hopeless time. Second, I try to propose that the use of an imperfect verb in the short paragraph can reach a climax in the whole chapter 25. From then on, Jehoiachin as a Davidic line will be restored and reign the Judah community.
Meanwhile when Enneateuch draws a conclusion as the Primary History, the Deuteronomist devised theological and rhetorical device, which is namely a dialect between discontinuity and continuity of the Kingdom of Judah. For Jehoiachin, though being a loser and a captive in Babylon, he could become a clue of a positive sign in the critical moment of Judah. Accordingly, by positioning Jehoiachin in the final step of Enneateuch, Deuteronomist could read into the possible continuity of Israel/Judah. Thus, Enneateuch could form a narrational structure of a long history from the beginning of the world to the last scene of Judah. If Genesis 2-3 reflects the Babylon exile of Israel, and the Book of Genesis is a prologue of the Primary History, the technique that closes the Enneateuch with the appearance of Jehoiachin is applicable to “an intelligible end”, that keeps not only theological consistence but also optimistic expectation from him.
목차
1. 오경인가 구경인가
2. 열왕기하 25장 27-30절의 분석과 역사 이해
3. 신명기사가의 눈에 비친 여호야긴과 에윌므로닥
4. 여호야긴 단화의 신학적 의의
5. 단절의 불안과 연속의 희망
6. 요약과 결론
〈참고문헌〉(References)
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
신명기 역사에 나타난 여호야긴 석방구절(왕하 25:27-30) 연구
신학과 목회
2015 .11
-
역대기에 나타난 ‘마알(מעל)’의 의미와 기능
성경원문연구
2019 .10
-
에스겔서의 ‘남은 자’ 사상: 유배-귀환 공동체 정체성의 배경
구약논단
2024 .12
-
사사기 19-21장에 나타난 숨겨진 정치적 논쟁
구약논단
2024 .09
-
내러티브 비평과 구약 제1내러티브(창세기~열왕기하)의 구조
구약논단
2016 .12
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
Theoretical Reinterpreting the Ancient Empires on Israel and Judah
한국기독교신학논총
2020 .07
-
사사기 1:1-2절에 관한 주석적 연구
구약논단
2021 .06
-
열왕기하 23장 13절의 역사 연구
구약논단
2021 .03
-
정상 가족 위기와 ‘이상한 정상’ 가족의 탄생: 창세기 38장을 중심으로
신학과 사회
2024 .02
-
신명기사가에게 요시야가 갖는 의미에 대한 고찰
구약논단
2021 .03
-
조선의 운명과 남 유다의 멸망에 대한 정치, 경제, 종교적 관점의 비교 연구: 예레미야서를 중심으로
구약논단
2023 .03
-
신명기 역사에 나타난 예후 -왕하 9:1-10:36-
신학과 목회
2019 .11
-
The Fall and Rise of Jerusalem : Judah under Babylonian Rule (Oded Lipschits, Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2005)
성경원문연구
2018 .10
-
창세기에 대한 연구 성과와 과제
구약논단
2021 .06
-
유다 ‐ 다말 내러티브에서 나타나는 형사취수제에 대한 사회적 강조 ‐ 창세기 38장 6-26절에 대한 분석
장신논단
2024 .06
-
창세기 내러티브 읽기: 익숙함과 낯섦의 주제
구약논단
2022 .06
-
사무엘상 8장 11-17절의 ‘왕의 권리’ : 왕의 정당한 권리를 이야기하는 글
구약논단
2017 .12
-
수막새에 새겨진 선악의 철학 —신라의 미소, 수막새를 통한 고찰—
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2020 .01
-
창세기 22장의 문학적 위치와 스토리텔링: 아브라함 가족 내러티브의 관점으로
구약논단
2023 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-233-002001181