지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since China and Korea established diplomatic relations in 1992, the economic and commercial communications have become increasingly frequent. Korea has become China’s fourth biggest source country of foreign investment. China has become Korea’s the biggest trade partner, the biggest target country for export, the biggest source country for import and the biggest target country for personnel motility. Due to the signing of FTA between China and Korea in 2015, the bilateral investment and personnel mobility will become more frequent. The number of cross-national enterprises and “international individuals” visit of two countries are increasing. On the premise of improving economic and commercial communications and smooth personnel mobility, how to solve the taxation problem of these cross-national enterprises and “international individuals” is a significant project that the tax authorities of the two countries must face together. It involves the tax jurisdiction of the two countries and needs mutual cooperation. The China-Korea Tax Treaty is the important legal basis to clarify tax jurisdiction and to avoid and solve the problems of taxation conflicts. Meanwhile, “resident” as a basic concept of the treaty is the premise and criterion of the application of respective resident jurisdiction rights. Its importance is self-evident.
The concerned residents refer to individual resident, resident enterprise and others. The thesis highlights the unclear and unreasonable regulations existing in the criteria of determining residency and conflict coordination regulations from the perspective of individual residents and resident enterprises.
For the criteria for determining a dual resident’s residence country, the author proposes center of vital interests as the first criterion, since the economy profits mainly determine the individual’s residence and living time. At the same time, 183 days rules should be introduced and accurately applied and work as the second criterion. Lastly, the author suggests weakening the role of the concept of permanent home as criterion for determining residency.
For the criteria of determining a residence country for resident enterprises and double resident enterprises, there’s difference between China and Korea in determining the resident country of resident enterprises according to their respective tax laws. But with the introduction of effective management and with the new international tendency to set criteria of resident enterprises represented by OECD, the paper suggests introducing effective management judging criteria in the China-Korea Tax Treaty. But in the long run, it is advisable to take into consideration introducing “the center of vital interests” criterion.
Meanwhile, the paper recommends perfecting domestic laws in line with th Tax Treaty to prevent immigration for the purpose of tax evasion.
The concerned residents refer to individual resident, resident enterprise and others. The thesis highlights the unclear and unreasonable regulations existing in the criteria of determining residency and conflict coordination regulations from the perspective of individual residents and resident enterprises.
For the criteria for determining a dual resident’s residence country, the author proposes center of vital interests as the first criterion, since the economy profits mainly determine the individual’s residence and living time. At the same time, 183 days rules should be introduced and accurately applied and work as the second criterion. Lastly, the author suggests weakening the role of the concept of permanent home as criterion for determining residency.
For the criteria of determining a residence country for resident enterprises and double resident enterprises, there’s difference between China and Korea in determining the resident country of resident enterprises according to their respective tax laws. But with the introduction of effective management and with the new international tendency to set criteria of resident enterprises represented by OECD, the paper suggests introducing effective management judging criteria in the China-Korea Tax Treaty. But in the long run, it is advisable to take into consideration introducing “the center of vital interests” criterion.
Meanwhile, the paper recommends perfecting domestic laws in line with th Tax Treaty to prevent immigration for the purpose of tax evasion.
목차
〈中文摘要〉
Ⅰ. ??
Ⅱ．中??收?定中居民?人的判定?准
Ⅲ. 中??收?定中居民企?的判定?准
Ⅳ. ??
〈?考文?〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
소득세법상 거주자 판단기준의 문제점 및 개선방향
경영교육연구
2019 .06
-
주민자치 법제화에 관한 연구
지방자치법연구
2021 .09
-
소득세법상 거주자 판단에 대한 검토
조세학술논집
2017 .06
-
소득세법상 거주자 규정 개선방안 연구 : 국외소득탈세방지를 위하여
조세학술논집
2015 .06
-
지역의 주민참여요인과 주민참여 활성화 및 정책효과의 관계 - 구조방정식을 활용한 주민자치위원회의 매개효과를 중심으로 -
한국지방행정학보
2015 .01
-
국제조세 주요 판례의 조명과 과제
조세법연구
2016 .11
-
혼성단체에 대한 조세조약 적용과 ‘가분적 거주자 이론’ : 대법원 2015. 3. 26. 선고 2013두7711 판결
조세학술논집
2016 .10
-
우리나라 소재 고정사업장의 ‘본국(本國)’과 이 고정사업장에 ‘귀속’하는 이자를 지급하는 채무자의 거주지국이 같을 때의 소득과세 문제 - 외국납부세액 공제와 관련하여
조세학술논집
2023 .03
-
Study on the Improvement of Paying Taxes in China proposed by the Analysis of Paying Taxest in Korea and Japan
East Asian Journal of Business Economics
2021 .09
-
동남권 외국인주민의 분포 특성과 거주지 결정요인에 관한 연구
주거환경
2023 .09
-
법인세법상 내국법인 개념과 판단요소에 관한 문제점과 개선방안 －법원판례와 조세심판원 결정사례 중심으로－
세무학연구
2021 .12
-
출국세 과세제도의 도입방안 연구
조세연구
2016 .06
-
한미조세조약상 개인인 이중거주자에 대한 거주자 판정기준 : “주거(permanent home)”를 중심으로
조세학술논집
2015 .10
-
농촌현장포럼에서 단어의 빈도가 주민교육 효과성에 미치는 영향
농촌계획
2022 .08
-
소득세법상 국외전출세 과세제도의 개선방안
조세학술논집
2019 .10
-
한·중 조세조약 해석에 관한 최근 대법원 판례 검토: 이중과세 회피를 위한 법인세법상 외국납부세액 공제제도와 OECD 모델조약 해석원칙을 중심으로
한양법학
2024 .11
-
중국의 동유럽국가 투자 시 고려해야 할 세법제도 연구
중국법연구
2024 .07
-
우리나라 조세조약의 개정 동향과 시사점
재무와 회계정보저널
2015 .01
-
조세조약 해석상 국내세법의 지위 : 조세조약상 ‘특허권의 사용’ 개념의 해석을 중심으로
조세학술논집
2016 .06
-
조세조약과 국내법의 충돌과 조화
조세학술논집
2016 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-001661887