메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

An Essay on Trends and Prospects of the 21st Century Western Aesthetics 2-Reconsideration of the Avant-Garde Theory - Buchloh and Foster's Criticism on Bürger and Bürger's Response -
Recommendations
Search
Questions

21세기 서양미학의 동향과 전망을 위한 시론 2-아방가르드 이론의 재검토 : 부클로 및 포스터의 뷔르거 비판과 뷔르거의 응답을 중심으로

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Chongki Kim (부산대학교)
Journal
KOREA ASSOCIATION FOR HISTORY OF MODERN ART Journal of History of Modern Art Vol.37 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2015.6
Pages
35 - 67 (33page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
An Essay on Trends and Prospects of the 21st Century Western Aesthetics 2-Reconsideration of the Avant-Garde Theory - Buchloh and Foster's Criticism on Bürger and Bürger's Response -
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
The aim of this essay is to deal with the putative twilight of the avant-garde movement and its prospects for the contemporary 21st century. This essay first analyzes the core of Burger’s avant-garde theory and appraises Buchloh and Foster’s criticism thereof. Then, the issues of the avant-garde and the post-avant-garde will be scrutinized from a pro-Burger perspective with a focus on Burger’s rebuttals. Burger regards the historic avant-garde as a failed project, and believes that the neo-avant-garde is a mere replica of the previously failed historic avant-garde. According to him, the neo-avant-garde has lacked the capacity to resist and to criticize ever since its beginning. However, Buchloh and Foster criticize Burger because they recognise the neo-avant-garde as taking a progressive stance. Regarding this, Burger criticizes Buchloh by stating that he is too pre-occupied with the analysis of superficial content, and therefore does not grasp the significance of the original avant-garde project in terms of a generalized theory. In addition, Burger does not deny Foster’s view that the avant-garde intention is truly being practiced by the second neo-avant-garde artists. However, he points out that there is always the risk of over- and under-appreciation when we appraise the works of individual artists. Therefore he insists that establishing the general theory is of foremost importance if we can acknowledge that an artist’s artwork has co-existing positive and negative features at the same time. Based on this, he argues that the avant-garde can exist only if the general population forms the belief that social change is needed to resolve conflicts within a society.

Contents

Ⅰ. 들어가면서
Ⅱ. 뷔르거의 아방가르드 이론과 이에 대한 비판
Ⅲ. 『아방가르드의 이론』 비판에 대한 뷔르거의 대응 또는 반비판
Ⅳ. 동시대 미술에서 아방가르드의 종말 또는 가능성 - 결론을 대신하여
참고문헌
Abstract

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-609-001642631