메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Min Jung Jee (The University of Queensland)
저널정보
서울대학교 언어교육원 어학연구 어학연구 제51권 제1호
발행연도
2015.4
수록면
167 - 195 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In recent decades, language learners’ strategy use and self-efficacy have been an important research topic for many researchers in second language acquisition as they are related to students’ success of learning a target language. To expand the discussion, this study investigated 92 Korean language learners’ strategy use and self-efficacy and their relations to achievement. The data were analysed based on learner groups-heritage learners (n = 40) and non-heritage learners (n = 52)- in order to explore differences between the two groups. A survey with 78 items for strategy use and self-efficacy was distributed at the end of the semester, and final grades were used to measure achievement. The results indicated that the students, overall, were moderate strategy users, and non-heritage students (M = 2.82) tended to use strategies more often than heritage students (M = 2.42), with significant differences. By achievement, the high-achievement students used the strategies the most frequently, followed by the low-achievement group and the mid-achievement group. Moreover, the ranking of frequently used strategy categories was different depending on the learner groups and achievement levels. Regarding self-efficacy, heritage students (M = 3.35) showed higher self-efficacy than non-heritage students (M = 2.83), with statistically significant differences. The high-achievement group also showed higher self-efficacy than the mid-achievement and low-achievement group. Regarding the correlations, there were statistically significant positive relations among strategy use, self-efficacy, and achievement, especially with non-heritage students. Issues such as effective use of strategies rather than frequency and cultural background were discussed.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion and Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (2)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-701-001395507