지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims to investigate short-term effects of automated writing feedback by comparing the university students’ essay drafts with their subsequent revisions. The results showed that about 56% errors were changed successfully from the Criterion feedback. For the rest, some students changed errors on their own without the Criterion feedback, others changed the errors unsuccessfully, and still others made no changes for various reasons. In addition, 18% of the Criterion feedback turned out to be wrong. When the students received the wrong feedback, they made unsuccessful changes up to 38%. Therefore, it was suggested that students should review and interpret the feedback critically. Finally, due to the nonspecific nature of the Criterion feedback in the organization/development trait, students rarely made changes on these dimensions. Since automated writing evaluation systems do not provide individualized feedback at the discourse level, the students reported in the questionnaire that they needed the teacher feedback and conference on the content and organization.
목차
영문초록
I. Introduction
II. Literature Review
III. Methodology
IV. Results and Discussions
V. Conclusion
References
Appendix
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술대회논문] - Attali, Y. / 2004 / Automated essay scoring with E-rater 2.0 / Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bustein, J. / 2004 / Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing service / AI Magazine 25 (3) : 27 ~ 36
3. [학술대회논문] - Elliot, S / 2004 / The impact of MY Access! use on student writing performance: A technology overview and four studies / Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
4. [단행본] - Ferris,D / 2006 / Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction In Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues / Cambridge University Press : 81 ~ 104
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태은 / 2010 / Reflection on Using the Criterion Online Writing Evaluation Service / 멀티미디어 언어교육 13 (3) : 59 ~ 83
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bustein, J. / 2004 / Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing service / AI Magazine 25 (3) : 27 ~ 36
3. [학술대회논문] - Elliot, S / 2004 / The impact of MY Access! use on student writing performance: A technology overview and four studies / Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
4. [단행본] - Ferris,D / 2006 / Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction In Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues / Cambridge University Press : 81 ~ 104
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김태은 / 2010 / Reflection on Using the Criterion Online Writing Evaluation Service / 멀티미디어 언어교육 13 (3) : 59 ~ 83
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Examining Attitudes of Korean EFL Learners toward Peer Review
Cho Yunkyoung
새한영어영문학
2006
.02
대학생 영어 글쓰기에서의 동료피드백에 관한 연구
손정미
한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문집
2014
.11
Learners’ Proficiency Level and the Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback on L2 Acquisition
Sung-Soo Jang
응용언어학
2014
.09
과정 중심의 작문 수업에서 교사 피드백과 동료 피드백의 유형 및 특징
김연희
,
김남국
언어학 연구
2013
.10
초등영어교육에 대한 교사들의 피드백
김경석
응용언어학
2002
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0