지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Article 118 of Program and Utilization for National Land Development Act provides that one who shall buy or sell the land must be acquire the gourvernment"s permission, for restraint the speculative trade of real estate in particular area. It also provides that the land transaction contract without such permission should be ineffective. However the general view and judicial precedents have interpreted the Article based on the Doctrine of Floating Void. Under this doctrine, a party could not demend the performance of the obligation, because prior to the permission, the contract does not carry it into effect. As legal obligations, the contracting parties must cooperate for getting the permission. If the permission is granted, the contract shall become valid definitely. But this doctrine cannot bar effectively any speculative trades. Moreover it is a theoretical repugnance that the legal duty of cooperation for getting the permission is based upon the validity of contract, while the contract without permission is null and void.
Therefore it is necessary to conceive a new idea for solution of this matter. It is appropriate view that the contract without permission is valid, provided that its effect ought to be suspended until the acquisition of permission. This article suggests that the permission for land transaction is the special condition. For the conditions of general contract, the general view have interpreted them to devide the condition of conclusion and the condition of effect. But this division of conception is incorrect from a different standpoint. In view of the nature of
contract, it cannot be admitted that a contract concluded is ineffective. I think that there two kinds of conditions for the effective contract. The one is general conditions, that is to say, contractant of capacity, corrective intention, accordance of offer and acceptance, moral and lawful purposes, the other one is special conditions, that is to say, right representative, acquisition of permission, achievement of suspended condition, etc.
Therefore I suggests that all contracts are effective when the general condition is fulfilled, and the legal duty of cooperation for getting the permission ought to be recognized from the provisional validity of contract. And also suggests, the contract carries it into effect definitely when the special condition(permission) is fulfilled, and therefore the obligations of contractant, such as payment and
registration, are actualized by the acquisition of permission.
Therefore it is necessary to conceive a new idea for solution of this matter. It is appropriate view that the contract without permission is valid, provided that its effect ought to be suspended until the acquisition of permission. This article suggests that the permission for land transaction is the special condition. For the conditions of general contract, the general view have interpreted them to devide the condition of conclusion and the condition of effect. But this division of conception is incorrect from a different standpoint. In view of the nature of
contract, it cannot be admitted that a contract concluded is ineffective. I think that there two kinds of conditions for the effective contract. The one is general conditions, that is to say, contractant of capacity, corrective intention, accordance of offer and acceptance, moral and lawful purposes, the other one is special conditions, that is to say, right representative, acquisition of permission, achievement of suspended condition, etc.
Therefore I suggests that all contracts are effective when the general condition is fulfilled, and the legal duty of cooperation for getting the permission ought to be recognized from the provisional validity of contract. And also suggests, the contract carries it into effect definitely when the special condition(permission) is fulfilled, and therefore the obligations of contractant, such as payment and
registration, are actualized by the acquisition of permission.
#토지거래허가
#인가
#국토의 계획 및 이용에 관한 법률
#국토이용관리법
#유동적 무효
#위헌법률심판
#토지거래법
#국토이용계획법
#정지조건
#투기거래
#허가협력의무
#Condition of Contract
#Permission
#Land Transaction
#Program and Utilization for National Land Development Act
#Doctrine of Floating Void
#Legal Duty of Cooperation for Getting the Permission
#Validity
#General Conditions
#Contractant of Capacity
#Corrective Intention
#Accordance of Offer and Acceptance
#Moral and Lawful Purposes
#Special Conditions
#Right Representative
#Acquisition of Permission
#Achievement of Suspended Condition
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 허가 없는 토지거래계약의 효력에 대한 이론전개
Ⅲ. 법률행위의 요건체계와 토지거래허가
Ⅳ. 결어
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (86)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)
-
대법원 1996. 6. 28. 선고 96다3982 판결
[1] 토지거래허가구역 내의 토지가 관할 관청의 허가 없이 전전매매되고 그 당사자들 사이에 최초의 매도인으로부터 최종 매수인 앞으로 직접 소유권이전등기를 경료하기로 하는 중간생략등기의 합의가 있는 경우, 이러한 중간생략등기의 합의란 부동산이 전전매도된 경우 각 매매계약이 유효하게 성립함을 전제로 그 이행의 편의상 최초의 매도인으로부터 최
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
開發行爲許可가 擬制되는 建築許可 拒否處分에 대한 司法審査 基準 및 審査强度
행정판례연구
2018 .01
-
土地去來 規制에 관한 硏究
경영경제
1993 .06
-
지방자치단체의 수의계약
행정법연구
2005 .10
-
무역계약서 표면약관의 적용상의 유의점에 관한 연구
무역연구
2018 .01
-
유동적 무효인 계약의 법률관계 : 토지거래허가 전 체결한 계약의 판례이론을 중심으로
중앙법학
2007 .10
-
도시계획의 핵심기능과 지적제도의 충돌 : 건축단위와 건축허용성을 중심으로
행정법연구
2006 .10
-
국제계약에 있어서 계약언어의 선택과 효과
중재연구
2005 .01
-
영화산업 종사자관련 계약상의 몇 가지 과제
중앙법학
2011 .12
-
INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT LAWS AND FORMATION OF CONTRACT
국제거래와 법
2011 .12
-
公共契約에서 契約金額調整을 排除하는 特約의 效力
행정판례연구
2018 .01
-
계약을 중심으로 하는 국제무역거래과정의 이해 : 정형거래조건을 중심으로
무역상무연구
2009 .02
-
계약구속력의 근거에 관한 새로운 이론모델
중앙법학
2014 .06
-
온라인계약의 특징
강원법학
2009 .06
-
불공정약관 조항의 유형과 특징 - 최근 3년간 공정거래위원회에서 심결한 계약을 중심으로 -
재산법연구
2009 .01
-
가맹사업법상 계약의 존속에 대한 규제
경쟁법연구
2019 .01
-
온라인 物品賣買契約에 관한 硏究
무역학회지
2002 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
[행정법] 집중효를 수반하는 건축신고가 「수리를 요하는 신고」인지의 여부 : 대법원 2011.1.20, 선고 2010두14954[건축신고불가취소]에 대한 평석
김향기
고시계
2011
.06
行政法과 法解釋 - 法律留保 내지 議會留保와 法形成의 限界 - : 대법원 2014. 4. 10. 선고 2011두31604 폐차신고수리거부처분취소사건 판결을 중심으로
박정훈
행정법연구
2015
.11
원자력발전소의 건설허가와 관련한 법적 문제 : 허가, 예외적 허가, 판단여지, 재량문제를 중심으로
최정일
행정법연구
2013
.07
보증금반환채권의 가압류와 임대인지위의 승계 : 대법원 2013. 1. 17. 선고 2011다49523 판결
임윤수
,
민선찬
법학연구
2013
.06
행정법상 신고의 요건과 심사범위
류광해
법학연구
2013
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001530321