메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
金淳錫 (전남대학교)
저널정보
(사)한국사법학회 비교사법 비교사법 제16권 제1호(통권 제44호)
발행연도
2009.3
수록면
267 - 320 (54page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the late 1980s a movement towards privatization swept through Western Europe, affecting many industries. The government role in the process was to protect national interests and preserve national independence. In an effort to do so, governments often retained some power and influence with regard to the newly privatized company.
Golden shares were first used in the United Kingdom during privatization in the 1980s for companies in which the government wanted to maintain some influence. Many nations privatized important industries but reluctant to give up all control, implemented restrictive measures which allowed varying degrees of governmental control over the privatized company. A golden share vests special rights in the government vis-avis the privatized company. These control rights take many forms, and are often granted through the conversion of a regular share into a special share to which these special control rights attach. Alternatively, ministerial veto power can substitute for an actual share, or can be a supplement power along with the special share. The most common control rights, and those which have come under attack by the European Commission, are: ⑴ the right to restrict the acquisition of shares; ⑵ the right to appoint directors to the board; ⑶ the right to veto certain critical company decisions; and ⑷ the right to limit the number of foreign directors on the board of the company.
This article reviews the characteristics and history of the golden share at first. It also analyzes golden share cases and laws of the European Court, the United States and Japan. Especially, it shows how golden share cases of the European Court have developed. This article discusses legal problems associated in introducing golden share system into Korea. It reviews the necessity of the introduction of the golden share into Korea, the method to adjust conflict of interests among shareholders, the relevance of one share one vote principles, and some legal issues with respect to listing golden shares on stock markets. Finally, it discusses the 2006 Revision to Korean Commercial Code and suggests to adopt golden shares for closed corporations.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 황금주의 의의 및 특징
Ⅱ. 주요국의 황금주 제도
Ⅳ. 황금주 도입을 둘러싼 법적 검토 과제
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (49)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001271732