지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.6
- 수록면
- 277 - 320 (44page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to survey the Tort Liability Act, passed on december 26, 2009, will take effect on July 1, 2010(hereafter, the Tort Act). China has made the Civil Code since 2002, which is not completed but is developing step by step, followed by the Contract Act(1999) and the Real Rights Act(2007). The Tort Liability Act is one of the most important law field of the Civil Code of China, because the Tort law protects the private rights and interests.
The Tort Act is mainly based on existing provisions, such as the general Principles of the Civil Law, the Act on Protection of Consumenr Rights, the Product Quality Law, etc and some judicial interpretations of the supreme court. Especially, it affirms, modifies and elaborates the he general Principles of the Civil Law(1986). Before its proclamation, there were two official drafts, the first in 2002, and the second in 2008, which are mainly the some with the Tort law, and several private drafts.
The Tort Act contains 12 chapters with 92 provisions，as follows : General provisions(chapter 1)ㆍConstituting liability and methods of assuming liability(ch. 2) ㆍCircumstances to waive and mitigate liability(ch. 3)ㆍSpecial provisions on tortfeasors(ch. 4)ㆍProduct liabilityㆍ(ch. 5)ㆍLiability for motor vehicle traffic accident(ch. 6)ㆍLiability for medical malpractice(ch. 7)ㆍLiability for environmental pollution(ch. 8)ㆍLiability for ultra-hazardous activity(ch. 9)ㆍLiability for harm caused by domestic animal(ch. 10)ㆍLiability for harm caused by object(ch. 11)ㆍSupplementary provision(ch. 12).
Compared to the Korean Civil Code，which under the part of obligations(part Ⅲ), provides, concurrently, a contract and a tort, the Tort Act has no part of obligations, but has only the contract act and the tort act.
According to the Tort Act, one who is at fault for infringement upon a civil right of another person shall be subject to the tort liability(article 2). It also covers infringements of personal rights, such as name, reputation, portrait, privacy and etc. The principle of tort liability on the basis of general provisions, is universally accepted. The default rule of the liability is the fault liability and in exception of the presumption of fault and no-fault liability without fault(articles 6 and 7).
The tort act contains, in its general part, criteria for liability, compensation for damages, defenses and mental damages, as well as in its specific part, product liability, motor vehicle accident liability, internet service provider liability, medical malpractice, environmental pollution liability, liability for ultra-hazardous activity and liability for damage caused by animals or by objects. It has also special provisions such as liability of persons with diminished capacity, joint and several liability of the joint tortfeasors. Introducing punitive damages is also one of its key features.
All these are the result of the unification of related provisions which are currently found in many fields. Its new and revolutionary approach and contents will be very suggestive for us preparing the reform of our code civil since 2009, although it seems to have a some lack of harmony in it.
The Tort Act is mainly based on existing provisions, such as the general Principles of the Civil Law, the Act on Protection of Consumenr Rights, the Product Quality Law, etc and some judicial interpretations of the supreme court. Especially, it affirms, modifies and elaborates the he general Principles of the Civil Law(1986). Before its proclamation, there were two official drafts, the first in 2002, and the second in 2008, which are mainly the some with the Tort law, and several private drafts.
The Tort Act contains 12 chapters with 92 provisions，as follows : General provisions(chapter 1)ㆍConstituting liability and methods of assuming liability(ch. 2) ㆍCircumstances to waive and mitigate liability(ch. 3)ㆍSpecial provisions on tortfeasors(ch. 4)ㆍProduct liabilityㆍ(ch. 5)ㆍLiability for motor vehicle traffic accident(ch. 6)ㆍLiability for medical malpractice(ch. 7)ㆍLiability for environmental pollution(ch. 8)ㆍLiability for ultra-hazardous activity(ch. 9)ㆍLiability for harm caused by domestic animal(ch. 10)ㆍLiability for harm caused by object(ch. 11)ㆍSupplementary provision(ch. 12).
Compared to the Korean Civil Code，which under the part of obligations(part Ⅲ), provides, concurrently, a contract and a tort, the Tort Act has no part of obligations, but has only the contract act and the tort act.
According to the Tort Act, one who is at fault for infringement upon a civil right of another person shall be subject to the tort liability(article 2). It also covers infringements of personal rights, such as name, reputation, portrait, privacy and etc. The principle of tort liability on the basis of general provisions, is universally accepted. The default rule of the liability is the fault liability and in exception of the presumption of fault and no-fault liability without fault(articles 6 and 7).
The tort act contains, in its general part, criteria for liability, compensation for damages, defenses and mental damages, as well as in its specific part, product liability, motor vehicle accident liability, internet service provider liability, medical malpractice, environmental pollution liability, liability for ultra-hazardous activity and liability for damage caused by animals or by objects. It has also special provisions such as liability of persons with diminished capacity, joint and several liability of the joint tortfeasors. Introducing punitive damages is also one of its key features.
All these are the result of the unification of related provisions which are currently found in many fields. Its new and revolutionary approach and contents will be very suggestive for us preparing the reform of our code civil since 2009, although it seems to have a some lack of harmony in it.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 불법행위책임법 일반론
Ⅲ. 불법행위책임법의 주요내용
Ⅳ. 나가며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 불법행위의 책임귀속원칙에 관한 연구－불법행위책임법(2009년)의 내용을 중심으로－
중국법연구
2010 .01
-
컴퓨터 소프트웨어의 오류와 민사책임
기업법연구
2006 .03
-
中国民法典中关于侵权责任的规定和变化
원광법학
2020 .01
-
공작물책임의 입법적 검토
법과 정책연구
2005 .01
-
인공지능과 불법행위책임
입법과 정책
2019 .01
-
계약책임과 불법행위책임의 관계 : 보호의무를 중심으로
비교사법
2003 .06
-
EU 불법행위법 통일 논의와 동아시아에서의 통일 모색
재산법연구
2010 .01
-
试论瑕疵担保责任在中国《合同法》上的定位
중국법연구
2013 .01
-
사용자책임의 비교법적 경향
고려법학
2009 .01
-
제조물책임법의 문제점
중앙법학
2003 .10
-
사회안전과 계약체결상의 과실책임
법학연구
2018 .03
-
중국 불법행위법 제정의 현황과 전망
법학논총
2009 .08
-
제조물책임보험에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2004 .02
-
中国产品责任赔偿范围研究 - 以侵权责任法与判例为研究視角 -
홍익법학
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001270902