지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Protection of irregular workers is the most necessary task in Korea. Though the proposition of irregular workers has been growing continually from ‘90s and is over 1/3 or 1/2 of total working population in Korea, their social and economic situations are very bad and poor. Responding this problem, this government has made a set of acts which are in general named as ‘Acts concerning irregular worker’. With these legislative efforts, the realization of protection for them depends on voluntary actions in civil societies such as employers, trade unions or employers’ associations. This is connected very deeply with ‘nobless oblise’. This paper aims to confirm who have the obligation of ‘nobless oblise’ and what the contents of ‘nobless oblise’ are in the problem of irregular workers.
Duty-holders of ‘nobless oblise’ must have high positions or strong powers being qualified to burden ‘oblise’. Concerning with the problem of irregular workers, they must have social voice, interest-relationship and power for problem-solving. In this respect, it is obvious that government, large companies and ‘trade unions for regular workers in large companies’ (‘large company unions’) are competent to be duty-holders of ‘nobless oblise’, but regular workers as individual can not be duty-holders in spite of their indirect interests by the existence of irregular workers.
The contents of ‘nobless oblise’ include ethical or moral duties as well as legal duties. In this respect, duties of each ‘nobless’ in this problem are like followings.
(A) Large companies should guarantee the just and favorable pay and working conditions of irregular workers in small companies which have depended economically on them.
(B) Government, local government or public agencies should show private sector good example as employer. Recently government addressed ‘comprehensive countermeasures for irregular workers in public sector’(‘06.8) and they might be suitable model in this problem.
(C) Large company unions have great failures in overcoming the selfishness mainly because of limitation of organization-pattern as company union. The trend of changing company unions into industrial unions may help the economic and social situation of irregular workers. But at the present state, large company unions are able to act for irregular workers employed in their companies or small companies working for their companies.
Duty-holders of ‘nobless oblise’ must have high positions or strong powers being qualified to burden ‘oblise’. Concerning with the problem of irregular workers, they must have social voice, interest-relationship and power for problem-solving. In this respect, it is obvious that government, large companies and ‘trade unions for regular workers in large companies’ (‘large company unions’) are competent to be duty-holders of ‘nobless oblise’, but regular workers as individual can not be duty-holders in spite of their indirect interests by the existence of irregular workers.
The contents of ‘nobless oblise’ include ethical or moral duties as well as legal duties. In this respect, duties of each ‘nobless’ in this problem are like followings.
(A) Large companies should guarantee the just and favorable pay and working conditions of irregular workers in small companies which have depended economically on them.
(B) Government, local government or public agencies should show private sector good example as employer. Recently government addressed ‘comprehensive countermeasures for irregular workers in public sector’(‘06.8) and they might be suitable model in this problem.
(C) Large company unions have great failures in overcoming the selfishness mainly because of limitation of organization-pattern as company union. The trend of changing company unions into industrial unions may help the economic and social situation of irregular workers. But at the present state, large company unions are able to act for irregular workers employed in their companies or small companies working for their companies.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 비정규직의 상황
Ⅲ. 비정규직 문제에서 노블리스 오블리주
Ⅳ. 글을 마치며
【Abstract】
【토론】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
병원의 비정규직 실태조사
한국병원경영학회지
2007 .01
-
비정규직 문제와 정규직 노동자들의 내적 이질성 : 공공부문 정규직 노동자 분석
경제와사회
2009 .06
-
A New Attempt at Organizing Irregular Workers in Korea: Examining the Activities of the Korean Women’s Trade Union
한국사회학
2014 .12
-
비정규직근로자의 보호를 위한 쟁점과제와 개선방안
노동법논총
2007 .12
-
Survival Analysis on the labor mobility of irregular workers by employment types in Korea
산업관계연구
2014 .12
-
건설업의 비정규직 고용 확대 문제
지역사회연구
2007 .06
-
비정규직의 현황 및 대책 : 고용의 안정성 및 유연성의 문제
저스티스
2008 .09
-
병원의 비정규직 고용정책과 경영전략
한국병원경영학회지
2008 .01
-
비정규직 활용이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향 : 고정효과모형 패널분석
노동연구
2018 .12
-
전자수리서비스 업종에서의 불법파견 관련 하급심 판례 재검토 : 서울중앙지법 2017. 1. 12 선고, 2013가합53613 판결을 중심으로
노동법논총
2017 .08
-
공무원인 근로자의 정치활동과 언론의 자유
노동법논총
2013 .12
-
주 5일제 근무와 비정규근로
한림법학 FORUM
2003 .06
-
개정 비정규직 보호법령의 문제점 고찰
노동법논총
2007 .06
-
[일반논문] 신자유주의 하에서 노동조합의 균열구조 변화 - 한국통신 정규직과 비정규직 간의 노동조합 내부정치를 중심으로
아세아연구
2005 .09
-
[특집/민주주의하에서 보호받지 못하는 노동/파견직, 여성 그리고 촉탁직 노동자]노동조합의 불평등 구조와 비정규직 여성노동자 -촉탁직 여성노동자 사례를 중심으로
아세아연구
2004 .09
-
정규직 노조의 비정규직 조직화 경험 사례연구 - 성공과 실패 요인 분석을 중심으로 -
노동연구
2019 .06
-
V Company
벤처다이제스트
2008 .01
-
V-Company
벤처다이제스트
2008 .01
-
V-Company
벤처다이제스트
2008 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000783226