지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares may be considered assignment of shares, which emphasizes the formality, and it may be considered security of shares, which emphasizes the substance of the contract. These different perspectives lead to differences in the legal force of mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares. Fundamentally, it is the issue of whether to regard mortgage in the form of written assignment as trust ownership or real rights granted by way of security. Provisional Registration Security Act regards mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares as real rights granted by way of security and the recent case on mortgage in the form of written assignment in general also shows the change of stance from the conventional “transfer of trust ownership” theory to “real rights granted by way of security” theory. Stock transfer is the stockholder’s way of public offering and has the opposing power against and the qualification-granting effect on the company of the transferee, causing a de facto change in ownership. Therefore, it is possible to apply the law in the case of mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares. In this regard, mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares, as a kind of real rights granted by way of security, has a characteristic of real rights granted by way of security, which means that the foreclosure is prohibited and the ownership of the shares cannot be acquired without certain clearing process by the creditor, even with the title transfer. This interpretation of the law better serves the intention of the contracting parties and the purpose of the law which is to protect the interest of the transferee. Since the creditor does not obtain the ownership of the shares, he or she obtains real rights granted by way of security. Therefore, the creditor has a right to distribution of profit but does not have a voting right. Also, the creditor does not have get an approval of the board of directors when signing a mortgage in the form of written assignment contract on the shares of a company that has a provision in the statute that says “the approval of the board of directors is required for a transfer of shares.” This is because mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares contract is interpreted as establishment of the security right, not a transfer of shares. However, the creditor must get an approval from the board of directors when disposing of his or her shares for exercising of right, as in the right of pledge of shares.
목차
Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 주식양도담보의 개념
Ⅲ. 주식양도담보권자의 지위
Ⅳ. 정관에 의한 양도제한주식의 양도담보
Ⅴ. 결론
Ⅵ. 餘論-주권폐지회사의 주식 양도담보
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (48)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
상법상 주식 양도담보의 법리에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2015 .08
-
동산 양도담보계약에서 채권자에 의한 채무자의 소유권 침해 가능성과 절도죄의 성부
비교형사법연구
2011 .01
-
근저당권의 피담보채권의 범위
법학연구
2004 .12
-
공유형 모기지제도의 특성 및 대출수요 영향요인 분석
부동산학연구
2015 .01
-
讓渡擔保의 法理 再構成
기업법연구
2003 .12
-
영국의 공유형모기지에 관한 연구
주거환경
2016 .09
-
獨逸 不動産擔保制度의 發展過程과 示唆點
경영법률
2009 .01
-
독일의 토지채무와 공시 그리고 그 시사점
재산법연구
2019 .01
-
주택담보대출 규제의 정책적 시사점
주거환경
2016 .12
-
국내 주택금융시장의 모기지 선택에 관한 연구
부동산학연구
2011 .01
-
中國의 抵當權에 관한 考察
법학연구
2008 .06
-
개정상법상 종류주식에 대한 고찰
일감법학
2012 .01
-
Discussions on Transfer of Mortgaged Ships without Mortgagee’s Consent under Chinese Law
해사법연구
2016 .01
-
양도담보의 조세법상의 논점
중앙법학
2003 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000705973