지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Korean government has been actively pursuing its trade policy geared towards creation of a more open market. However, these policies are, at times, being impeded by interest groups concerned about economic damage should these policies be implemented. The Korean government has paid scant attention to strategies of interest groups until now; but if the government, as a provider of policies, can predict behavior of interest groups in advance, it would be able to implement its trade liberalization policy much more efficiently.
In this context, the purpose of this paper is to measure levels of political resistance that various Korean industries would mount against trade liberalization. This paper analyzes Korea's manufacturing industries utilizing data from KSIC (Korea Standard Industry Code) two digits. By measuring the potential benefit of voices and perceived chances of success by industry, this paper identifies the industry group that is most likely to affect political resistance to trade liberalization. The conclusions of this paper can provide a point of reference when the government introduces the policy of trade liberalization. If the government takes political variables, along with economic variables, into consideration to predict behavior of interest groups, it could increase the efficiency in promotion and implementation of its trade liberalization policies.
In this context, the purpose of this paper is to measure levels of political resistance that various Korean industries would mount against trade liberalization. This paper analyzes Korea's manufacturing industries utilizing data from KSIC (Korea Standard Industry Code) two digits. By measuring the potential benefit of voices and perceived chances of success by industry, this paper identifies the industry group that is most likely to affect political resistance to trade liberalization. The conclusions of this paper can provide a point of reference when the government introduces the policy of trade liberalization. If the government takes political variables, along with economic variables, into consideration to predict behavior of interest groups, it could increase the efficiency in promotion and implementation of its trade liberalization policies.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경: 이익집단의 전략에 영향을 미치는 변수
Ⅲ. 한국 제조업의 무역자유화에 대한 저항가능성 측정
Ⅳ. 결론 및 시사점
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Public Goods Policies in the Face of Forced Trade Liberalization : The Case of Farm Policy
연세경영연구
1993 .06
-
서비스무역자유화의 경제적 이익에 관한 고찰
문화산업연구
2003 .12
-
貿易ㆍ資本の自由化のマクロ経濟への効果
관세학회지
2006 .05
-
한국의 무역 자유화 : 개방ㆍ보호ㆍ보상의 정치경제
한국정치학회보
2011 .12
-
디지털무역 자유화를 위한 지역무역협정의 성과와 과제
무역연구
2019 .01
-
POLITICAL LIBERALIZATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH KOREA
Journal of Asian Sociology
1991 .07
-
Impact of Trade Liberalization under Alternative Scenarios
[KIEP] 연구보고서
1997 .12
-
Liberalization of Trade in Services and Productivity Growth in Korea
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2000 .12
-
Assessing APEC Trade Liberalization
[KIEP] 연구보고서
1997 .08
-
무역자유화의 국내정치 제도적 조건 : 교차국가간 비교분석
국제정치논총
2006 .09
-
HAS TRADE LIBERALIZATION IMPROVED FOOD AVAILABILITY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES? AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
Journal of Economic Development
2014 .01
-
Democracy, Does It Affect Trade Liberalization?
한국무역학회 학술대회
2003 .05
-
Trade Liberalization, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and the Environment: Time Series Evidence from G-20 Economies
[KIEP] East Asian Economic Review
2011 .03
-
서비스 무역자유화에 따른 정책적 대응방안
한국관세학회 학술대회
2009 .06
-
Impacts of Trade liberalization to Poverty and Growth in Asia
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
2002 .12
-
Trade Liberalization, Intra-Industry Reallocation of Labor and Trade Adjustment Assistance
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2011 .10
-
Still Open Regionalism? : APEC and East Asian Move Towards Bilateral Trade Liberalization
한국정치학회보
2005 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-326-004234717