지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview and discussion of current works that analyze the economic gains of the liberalization of trade in services. Liberalization of services sectors is different from trade in goods because the former involves factor mobility and technology spillover as well as enhanced competition.
According to the analyses on individual services sectors, the trade liberalization of telecommunication and financial services contribute meaningfully to the economic performance and bring relatively greater benefits to developing countries than those to developed countries.
Measuring the economic-wide impact of trade liberalization requires a global, general equilibrium framework which captures both the inter-sectoral effects in each economy and the links among countries. The literature overview shows that liberalization of services trade generates overall welfare gains under all modelling assumptions. Large gains are indicated by studies assuming imperfect competition in the service markets. The empirical exploration also shows that the potential importance of technical externalities transmitted through trade in services is significant, contributing large shares to the trade liberalization gains.
According to the analyses on individual services sectors, the trade liberalization of telecommunication and financial services contribute meaningfully to the economic performance and bring relatively greater benefits to developing countries than those to developed countries.
Measuring the economic-wide impact of trade liberalization requires a global, general equilibrium framework which captures both the inter-sectoral effects in each economy and the links among countries. The literature overview shows that liberalization of services trade generates overall welfare gains under all modelling assumptions. Large gains are indicated by studies assuming imperfect competition in the service markets. The empirical exploration also shows that the potential importance of technical externalities transmitted through trade in services is significant, contributing large shares to the trade liberalization gains.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 서비스무역의 추세
Ⅲ. 서비스무역자유화의 효과
Ⅳ. 서비스무역자유화의 경제적 이익 추정
Ⅴ. 결어
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
貿易ㆍ資本の自由化のマクロ経濟への効果
관세학회지
2006 .05
-
한국 제조업의 무역자유화에 대한 저항가능성 측정 : 정치경제학적 관점
무역학회지
2010 .08
-
Impact of Trade Liberalization under Alternative Scenarios
[KIEP] 연구보고서
1997 .12
-
HAS TRADE LIBERALIZATION IMPROVED FOOD AVAILABILITY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES? AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
Journal of Economic Development
2014 .01
-
디지털무역 자유화를 위한 지역무역협정의 성과와 과제
무역연구
2019 .01
-
Liberalization of Trade in Services and Productivity Growth in Korea
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2000 .12
-
Gains from Trade Liberalization between Heterogeneous Countries: Implications for Korea-Japan FTA
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2013 .12
-
한국의 무역 자유화 : 개방ㆍ보호ㆍ보상의 정치경제
한국정치학회보
2011 .12
-
Assessing APEC Trade Liberalization
[KIEP] 연구보고서
1997 .08
-
Impacts of Trade liberalization to Poverty and Growth in Asia
[KIEP] 월간 KIEP 세계경제
2002 .12
-
서비스 무역자유화에 따른 정책적 대응방안
한국관세학회 학술대회
2009 .06
-
Trade Liberalization, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and the Environment: Time Series Evidence from G-20 Economies
[KIEP] East Asian Economic Review
2011 .03
-
서비스무역 프로세스 분석과 시사점
무역학회지
2006 .11
-
Public Goods Policies in the Face of Forced Trade Liberalization : The Case of Farm Policy
연세경영연구
1993 .06
-
Financial Liberalization, Crises, and Economic Growth
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2007 .10
-
Trade Liberalization in Environmental Goods : Major Issues and Impacts
Korea and the World Economy
2011 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
우리나라 서비스 무역의 국제경쟁력 분석
김영환
한국무역학회 학술대회
2013
.05
서비스무역이 경제성장과 노동시장에 미치는 영향 : 생산자서비스를 중심으로
김수은
,
최영준
무역학회지
2013
.04
대기업 유통자본 규제를 위한 국내 규제조치와 WTO 서비스무역협정에 관한 일반협정(GATS) 불일치 여부에 관한 연구
김우형
법학연구
2012
.11
서비스무역의 세이프가드 제도의 타당성 검토
채은선
법학연구
2011
.05
무역지원기관의 서비스품질과 기업특성이 수출기업의 무역지원기관 서비스 만족도, 활용도 및 수출성과에 미치는 영향
황경연
,
문희철
,
배명렬
통상정보연구
2011
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-381-002419182