지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the attempts in Pour la Poetique Ⅱ, H. Meschonnic has carried out the basic reflection on the stakes of translation in the creative way. Unlike the previous methods of interpretation which are simple, thus considered as a copy, an imitation and a secondary text, his perspective on translation has brought the theories of languages into play. That is why the thoughts of Meschonnic on translation have revealed the historical implications of translation.
Meschonnic has used definite, specific and original interpretation on translation stretched from the era of Renaissance, the middle age, until today. Therefore Meschonnic's contribution has been started in ⅩⅥe century. The theories of translation and the characteristics of its practice were very well-known during that time thanks to the work of Chomarat, Worth, Meerhof, and several studies related to the history (or historys) of translation. In addition, the development of those theories of translation could not be going without the undeniable contribution of Etienne Dolet as well as of Du Bellay. However, the reflection on translation of the French Renaissance did not make it possible to release coherent and homogeneous overall concept. That was rather than gigantic mass of translations of old texts produced during this period. The writer-translators such as Dolet and Du Bellay inter alia, saw the translation as effective means to elevate the state of French as a literary language on the same level as Latin and Greek. As Meschonnic said, however, their significances are far beyond this level.
They are conscious of proposing some concepts called "le nombre oratoire"(the oratorical number) (Dolet) which implies the methods of translation by the rhythm and the prosody in the dimension of the discourse, not in the langue(within the meaning of Saussure) and the affinity (Du Bellay). While crossing the dichotomic frontier of translation of the direction and the literal translation, they also open the new way of translation toward the discourse. In other words, Meschonnic crosses any history of translation freely. Indeed, the question of the affinity concerning the manner of translating can be offset immediately by the dualistic method of translation. In this direction, we can say the reflection on the literature and the development of the manner of translation are inseparably and massively bound and interrelated. Hence, the role of translation, that of literature in particular, dosen't simply make us turn towards a only formal respect of the origin texts but rather become translators and theorists of translation trying to make flash back to the specificity of writing in the discourse.
Meschonnic has used definite, specific and original interpretation on translation stretched from the era of Renaissance, the middle age, until today. Therefore Meschonnic's contribution has been started in ⅩⅥe century. The theories of translation and the characteristics of its practice were very well-known during that time thanks to the work of Chomarat, Worth, Meerhof, and several studies related to the history (or historys) of translation. In addition, the development of those theories of translation could not be going without the undeniable contribution of Etienne Dolet as well as of Du Bellay. However, the reflection on translation of the French Renaissance did not make it possible to release coherent and homogeneous overall concept. That was rather than gigantic mass of translations of old texts produced during this period. The writer-translators such as Dolet and Du Bellay inter alia, saw the translation as effective means to elevate the state of French as a literary language on the same level as Latin and Greek. As Meschonnic said, however, their significances are far beyond this level.
They are conscious of proposing some concepts called "le nombre oratoire"(the oratorical number) (Dolet) which implies the methods of translation by the rhythm and the prosody in the dimension of the discourse, not in the langue(within the meaning of Saussure) and the affinity (Du Bellay). While crossing the dichotomic frontier of translation of the direction and the literal translation, they also open the new way of translation toward the discourse. In other words, Meschonnic crosses any history of translation freely. Indeed, the question of the affinity concerning the manner of translating can be offset immediately by the dualistic method of translation. In this direction, we can say the reflection on the literature and the development of the manner of translation are inseparably and massively bound and interrelated. Hence, the role of translation, that of literature in particular, dosen't simply make us turn towards a only formal respect of the origin texts but rather become translators and theorists of translation trying to make flash back to the specificity of writing in the discourse.
목차
1. 서론
2. 번역사의 재구성을 위하여
3. 친화력과 운문번역: 남겨진 과제
4. 결론
참고 문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
On Translation Again
Korea Journal
1970 .08
-
한국 번역학 연구의 현황과 전망
번역학연구
2005 .09
-
번역된 정전 ― 《人啊，人！》과 《사람아, 아 사람아!》 비교 고찰
중국소설논총
2013 .01
-
번역강의실에서의 의사소통
번역학연구
2012 .06
-
번역에 대한 제도적 관점의 중요성 고찰 : ‘제도번역’ 개념을 중심으로
번역학연구
2012 .12
-
탐구번역론 - 하나의 인문학 번역론
번역학연구
2009 .06
-
중국의 번역연구 동향
번역학연구
2012 .09
-
1920년대, 1930년대 국내 번역 담론과 번역학 이론과의 연계성 고찰
동서비교문학저널
2009 .06
-
구글 번역의 사례연구 : 번역품질과 번역단위와의 관계를 중심으로
번역학연구
2014 .03
-
Computers in the Translation Process : Getting the most out of IT Resources for Translations
성경원문연구
2003 .02
-
번역 연구와 언어 이론
인문언어
2012 .01
-
번역 교육을 둘러싼 테크놀로지 담론
통역과 번역
2005 .01
-
A Study on Post-colonial Translation
통번역교육연구
2012 .01
-
번역공학적 이성 비판: 디지털 시대 번역학의 과제
번역학연구
2020 .10
-
한국 번역사의 시대 구분
번역학연구
2008 .03
-
Differing Perspectives on Translation: A Brief History & Overview
통번역교육연구
2018 .01
-
미국, 유럽, 중국, 캐나다, ISO 번역 표준에 관한 복수사례연구
번역학연구
2015 .06
-
번역능력 향상에 따른 번역행위에 대한 고찰-동일 피험자에 대한 과거와 현재 TAP실험 결과의 정성적 분석-
통역과 번역
2007 .01
-
Translation Errors Caused by Lexical Transfer
번역학연구
2012 .12
-
번역능력 차이에 따른 일한번역과정 연구 -발화내용에 대한 정성적 분석을 중심으로 -
통역과 번역
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-701-004325390