지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims to investigate the difference between the two groups - Korean and Korean Chinese in terms of the discourse marker as a reaction to the praising discourse. The way how they accept was as follows.
Regarding the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for causality, both groups showed 'thank you' at a high rate of frequency which means they accept it willingly.
In terms of the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for greeting, 'thank you' was at the higher frequency in Korean collage students but Korean-Chinese collage students reacted saying 'really' at the higher frequency which showed indirect way of accepting it. Koran college students accepted it willingly since they regards it as showing an interest to the counterpart. In case of Korean-Chinese often uses discourse marker for retaining social relationship with the counterpart and for reconfirming it.
Regarding the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for flattery, Korean college students reacted like 'thank you', 'not really' with high frequencies which means they accept it with passive and heavily upon his mind.
On the other hand, the Korean-Chinese illustrated 'not really', 'don't say that' with high frequencies. This because Korean college students are not willingly take the praising discourse not to make the counterpart displeased, they take it indirectly but Korean-chinese college students exposed refusal response and attitude.
For making the communication better, the listener should respond with speech act that the culture of the speaker is expecting and it is important and needed an attitude learning and accepting the culture of the listener.
Regarding the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for causality, both groups showed 'thank you' at a high rate of frequency which means they accept it willingly.
In terms of the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for greeting, 'thank you' was at the higher frequency in Korean collage students but Korean-Chinese collage students reacted saying 'really' at the higher frequency which showed indirect way of accepting it. Koran college students accepted it willingly since they regards it as showing an interest to the counterpart. In case of Korean-Chinese often uses discourse marker for retaining social relationship with the counterpart and for reconfirming it.
Regarding the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for flattery, Korean college students reacted like 'thank you', 'not really' with high frequencies which means they accept it with passive and heavily upon his mind.
On the other hand, the Korean-Chinese illustrated 'not really', 'don't say that' with high frequencies. This because Korean college students are not willingly take the praising discourse not to make the counterpart displeased, they take it indirectly but Korean-chinese college students exposed refusal response and attitude.
For making the communication better, the listener should respond with speech act that the culture of the speaker is expecting and it is important and needed an attitude learning and accepting the culture of the listener.
목차
1. 緖論
2. 理論背景
3. 硏究 設計
4. 硏究 結果 및 假說의 檢證
5. 原因 分析
6. 結論
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (6)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국어 담화표지어 유형 및 중한 대조 연구
담화와인지
2016 .02
-
Some Thoughts on Discourse markers
영어영문학
2003 .12
-
한중 담화표지 대조연구 : 개념과 특징을 중심으로
언어학 연구
2018 .07
-
고등학교 중국어 교과서에 나타난 담화표지어 분석
중국어문학논집
2016 .08
-
한국어 담화표지 연구의 현황과 과제
한말연구
2017 .01
-
한국어 담화표지에 대한 고찰 : 담화표지의 정체 및 형성의 문제와 관련하여
한국어학
2019 .05
-
현대 중국어 담화기능 연구를 통한 중국어 교육 방안 : 담화 표지 ‘完了’를 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2014 .08
-
Discourse Functions of New-this
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2004 .04
-
Reference in Korean Discourse
Korea Journal
1979 .02
-
담화표지어로서의 oh에 관한 연구
언어과학
2014 .01
-
말레이시아인 한국어 고급 학습자의 토론 담화 양상 연구 : 토론 담화표지를 중심으로
담화와인지
2010 .04
-
담화 단위와 의미
한국어학
2017 .11
-
담화 표지어 indeed의 의미화용적 기능에 관한 연구
언어과학
2019 .01
-
한중 감탄사 유래 담화표지 대조 연구
언어학 연구
2020 .04
-
만주국 시기 조선인 이민담론의 시론적 고찰 : 조선일보 사설을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .03
-
담화표지의 기능별 번역 양상 연구: 영한 더빙텍스트 코퍼스 분석을 중심으로
통역과 번역
2019 .01
-
Well-Being Discourse and Chinese Food in Korean Society
Korea Journal
2010 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-710-004308309