지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 11 - 257 (248page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This review provides an overview of the position and use of restorative justice programmes in the United States of America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the England & Wales, together with summaries ad examples of programmes in five European jurisdictions(Germany, France, Austria, Netherlands and Belgium).
In each case, the review summarizes the provision of restorative justice under four thematic headings:
? legal bases
? scope
? implementation
? evaluation
The review compares and contrasts the principal features of these themes across the different jurisdictions, identifying the similarities and dissimilarities between their various restorative justice initiatives. In doing so, the review draws some lessens about good practice in restorative justice provision. Finally, the review places the work currently being undertaken within wider theoretical debates about the nature and scope of restorative justice and highlights some of the strenghts and weakness of evaluative research into its impact.
The review will be of value to those who seek an understanding ofrestorative justice provision in a wider international context. Both the detailed accounts and the evaluative summary about the empirical researches for the effectiveness of restorative justice programmes in the different countries, will enable readers to compare that provisions with their own understanding of the theory and practice of restorative justice.
Where restorative justice provision has displayed coherence, durability, and efficiency, its introduction and development have taken place in jurisdiction sharing the following factors:
? a strong and sustained impetus for reform
? a common ideology among those pressing for action
? open-minded and the political will of successive governments
? attention to practical detail in the formulation and implemen-tation of the chosen interventions
? a combined and continuing effort on the part of all relevant agencies
? reliance on validation research from the outset
? sound financial planing and support
? inclusiveness and
? supervision by a responsible co-ordination agency.
In each case, the review summarizes the provision of restorative justice under four thematic headings:
? legal bases
? scope
? implementation
? evaluation
The review compares and contrasts the principal features of these themes across the different jurisdictions, identifying the similarities and dissimilarities between their various restorative justice initiatives. In doing so, the review draws some lessens about good practice in restorative justice provision. Finally, the review places the work currently being undertaken within wider theoretical debates about the nature and scope of restorative justice and highlights some of the strenghts and weakness of evaluative research into its impact.
The review will be of value to those who seek an understanding ofrestorative justice provision in a wider international context. Both the detailed accounts and the evaluative summary about the empirical researches for the effectiveness of restorative justice programmes in the different countries, will enable readers to compare that provisions with their own understanding of the theory and practice of restorative justice.
Where restorative justice provision has displayed coherence, durability, and efficiency, its introduction and development have taken place in jurisdiction sharing the following factors:
? a strong and sustained impetus for reform
? a common ideology among those pressing for action
? open-minded and the political will of successive governments
? attention to practical detail in the formulation and implemen-tation of the chosen interventions
? a combined and continuing effort on the part of all relevant agencies
? reliance on validation research from the outset
? sound financial planing and support
? inclusiveness and
? supervision by a responsible co-ordination agency.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 회복적 소년사법 모델의 이념과 원칙들
제3장 영미권 국가의 회복적 소년사법 정책
제4장 유럽국가의 회복적 소년사법 정책
제5장 회복적 사법실천의 성과와 주요 쟁점
제6장 한국의 소년사법 발전을 위한 정책제언
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
회복적 사법과 우리나라의 형사제재체계
형사법연구
2007 .01
-
소년사법과 회복적 사법
피해자학연구
2009 .01
-
한국의 回復的 少年司法에 관한 연구
비교형사법연구
2008 .01
-
수복적 사법(restorative justice)-일본의 現狀과 전망
법학연구
2002 .12
-
범죄피해자보호·지원을 위한 회복적 패러다임의 실천방안
피해자학연구
2008 .01
-
가정폭력 사건에 대한 새로운 접근 : 유럽의 회복적 정의 실천을 중심으로
국제학논총
2017 .12
-
회복적 사법의 개념과 활용가능성에 관한 小考
피해자학연구
2004 .01
-
Restorative Justice? What’s that?
법학논집
2011 .01
-
영국의 회복적 교정 실무현황과 도입가능성
피해자학연구
2011 .01
-
Restorative Justice Dialogue : Three Decades of Victim Offender Mediation Practice & Research in the Global Community
교정연구
2007 .01
-
21세기 소년사법 개혁과 회복적 사법의 가치
형사정책연구
2007 .09
-
보호관찰단계에서 회복적 사법이념의 실천방안 : 형사화해제도를 중심으로
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
-
회복적 사법의 실천으로서 형사조정
한양법학
2015 .11
-
뉴질랜드의 회복적 사법
법학논집
2006 .01
-
사회봉사·수강명령에서의 회복적 사법 적용방안
법학논집
2011 .01
-
회복적 소년사법 조정실무가 실행지침
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003834759