개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.12
- 수록면
- 11 - 242 (234page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Victim Offender Mediation & Dialogue(Criminal Reconciliation) is a policy to solve criminal problem through the effort of the offender to reason with the victim through reparation and apology. "Reconciliation" inseparably set it forth as a premise the reparation of the harm caused by the crime, such as repairing material demage and healing the emotional injuries and vindictive feelings. Restitution and reconciliation is practical principle to realize the ideology of restorative justice. Restorative justice is percieved as a new compromised judicial model to overcome the limitation of (traditional) criminal justice system in the midst of political and social change in late 20th century and has immensely influenced the judicial practice of various countries. In Korea, a small number began to file and introduce foreign documents in fragments in 1990's; however, to the most scholars and practitioners, restorative justice is still a crude concept. The reality is that even the term itself is not standardized.
This paper analyzed the legislation of other's country and compared it to find out which VOMD can be suitable for korean criminal justice. The objects of this analysis are US, Germany, Austria, France, Australia and New Zealand.
In North America and Europe, most countries implemented restorative judicial practice after 1980's. After late 1990s, international interest on this issue is greatly increased that UN endeavor to provide international recommendation on restorative justice. For it is most likely that restorative judicial practice will be also introduced to Korea, we need to find its concrete system. But, considering our reality of poor voluntarily private-community based agency and lacking speciality, it is desirable that we implement the program experimentally on juvenile cases first.
The studies on ideology of restorative justice and its theoritical objectivity have been already accumulated by great numbers of foreign scholars and practicioners from the early 1980s. At present time, opinions opposing the ideology of restorative justice entirely of denying its objectivity almost disappeared. Also, the purpose of this document is not on introducing and arranging theoretical dispute on restorative justice.
In currently, there is nothing but 'criminal consent' and this is not official. So, there should be Mediators which consist of civil to maintain the VOMD rationally. Mediators have to protect the victim safety and need to give the victim thorough and accurate information about the mediation itself too. A critical task for mediator is to attend the victim, listening carefully, patiently, and sympathetically out of a genuine desire to hear about the victim's experience. The mediator's attentive listening encourages the victim's trust and lets the victim know that he or she is a priority. It is needed that VOMD should be legislated in Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Code to protect the victims' rights.
This paper analyzed the legislation of other's country and compared it to find out which VOMD can be suitable for korean criminal justice. The objects of this analysis are US, Germany, Austria, France, Australia and New Zealand.
In North America and Europe, most countries implemented restorative judicial practice after 1980's. After late 1990s, international interest on this issue is greatly increased that UN endeavor to provide international recommendation on restorative justice. For it is most likely that restorative judicial practice will be also introduced to Korea, we need to find its concrete system. But, considering our reality of poor voluntarily private-community based agency and lacking speciality, it is desirable that we implement the program experimentally on juvenile cases first.
The studies on ideology of restorative justice and its theoritical objectivity have been already accumulated by great numbers of foreign scholars and practicioners from the early 1980s. At present time, opinions opposing the ideology of restorative justice entirely of denying its objectivity almost disappeared. Also, the purpose of this document is not on introducing and arranging theoretical dispute on restorative justice.
In currently, there is nothing but 'criminal consent' and this is not official. So, there should be Mediators which consist of civil to maintain the VOMD rationally. Mediators have to protect the victim safety and need to give the victim thorough and accurate information about the mediation itself too. A critical task for mediator is to attend the victim, listening carefully, patiently, and sympathetically out of a genuine desire to hear about the victim's experience. The mediator's attentive listening encourages the victim's trust and lets the victim know that he or she is a priority. It is needed that VOMD should be legislated in Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Code to protect the victims' rights.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 회복적 사법의 이념과 본질
제3장 사회내 처우로서 보호관찰제도
제4장 주요국에 있어서 회복적 사법의 현상
제5장 보호관찰단계에서 회복적 사법이념의 실천 방안
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
회복적 사법의 개념과 활용가능성에 관한 小考
피해자학연구
2004 .01
-
회복적 사법의 실천으로서 형사조정
한양법학
2015 .11
-
범죄피해자보호·지원을 위한 회복적 패러다임의 실천방안
피해자학연구
2008 .01
-
소년사법과 회복적 사법
피해자학연구
2009 .01
-
보호관찰에서 회복적 사법의 실현방안
교정연구
2015 .01
-
Restorative Justice Dialogue : Three Decades of Victim Offender Mediation Practice & Research in the Global Community
교정연구
2007 .01
-
범죄피해자와 회복적 사법의 모델
피해자학연구
2005 .01
-
회복적 사법과 우리나라의 형사제재체계
형사법연구
2007 .01
-
북미의 회복적 사법에 대한 고찰
피해자학연구
2007 .01
-
피해자관계적형벌론과 수복적사법의 가능성
비교법학연구
2005 .03
-
가정폭력 사건에 대한 새로운 접근 : 유럽의 회복적 정의 실천을 중심으로
국제학논총
2017 .12
-
回復的 司法의 意義와 그 受容可能性
법학연구
2003 .12
-
한국의 回復的 少年司法에 관한 연구
비교형사법연구
2008 .01
-
회복적 사법정의 배경, 발전과정, 주요프로그램 그리고 선진교정복지
교정연구
2007 .01
-
형법에 있어서 피해자측면에 관한 연구
법학연구
2007 .06
-
형사상 화해·조정제도에 관한 연구
한국경찰연구
2008 .01
-
형사사법절차에의 범죄피해자 참여제도실효화 방안
피해자학연구
2013 .01
-
각국의 회복적 소년사법 정책동향
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2004 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003834355