지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.12
- 수록면
- 9 - 161 (154page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
'Spam' or 'unsolicited email' is an electronic junk mail sent to a large number of net-participants who do not request it. It contains products and services in which recipients may have no interests. Criminals have been to take an advantage of this tool easily through harmful activities such as 'phishing', 'virus spreading', and 'cyber terrorism'. The unsolicited email without specific control may endanger the network accounability and society.
In the late 1990s the Korean government assembled experts to discuss the new regulations on cyber crime. Several laws have been enacted since then. The most important acts are the Korean Criminal law, the Using and Protecting Communication Act(UPCA), the Communication Privacy Act(UPA), the Intellectual Property Act(IPA), and the Electric Communication Act(ECA) etc.
Main targets of these laws are virus spreading, computer hacking, cyber pornography, intellectual property breaching, private or public information abusing and cyber terrorism. These laws were revised or legislated for the purpose of attacking cyber crimes. The Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Information and Communication provide several commitments to consider the proper programme to protect private user and public sector from all kinds of cyber crimes.
Among other cybercrimes, spam mail, the unsolicited email is now illegal. It was controversial whether it should be criminally restricted or not. But since 2001 every spammer should reduce their mailing business if the computer user expresses the denial. Still we may consider the next step to reduce the spam mail and spam advertisements on mobile communication. The Korean law regulates only the opt?out methods, but I recommended recently, in my report, to the government to adopt the opt?in method. In the opt?in method, the advertisement provider must ask the customer before sending the messages. It creates us more effective to control the spammer.
Recently the unsolicited email containing commercial information is broadly accepted as an illegal commitment to endangering the network. Some reports say it could cause real damages. For the proper policy on controlling spam we need comprehensive strategy scheme. The law enforcement, communication participant and domestic Internet provider, policy maker, Internet user, and education will be cooperated. With this prevention network we could rebuild the clear and safe network. It must be enhanced the international cooperation. Without the international cooperation, all efforts could be in vain.
For the cooperative relationship, we should share the information. Poor information sharing could hamper the preventive activity in international legal enforcement. Although some countries, particularly in Asian?Pacific area, were found to have addressed a number of this broader information sharing. Few countries were able to demonstrate that adequate legal measures had been taken to ensure that perpetrators of cyber crime would be held accountable for their actions.
Outdated laws and regulations, and weak law enforcement create an environment for the illegal cyber behaviours. Inadequate legal protection of digital information can produce barriers to its exchange. As e?commerce expands globally, the strong and consistent measure for mutual information sharing will be needed. The international conventions and bilateral treaties are going to be prepared in some day.
For mitigating the impact of spam requires :
- govenrments must enhance legislation to prevent spam
- law enforcement agencies could investigate the spammers
- internet service providers(IPSs) must filter all email to remove spam prior to releasing it to recipients' inboxes
In the late 1990s the Korean government assembled experts to discuss the new regulations on cyber crime. Several laws have been enacted since then. The most important acts are the Korean Criminal law, the Using and Protecting Communication Act(UPCA), the Communication Privacy Act(UPA), the Intellectual Property Act(IPA), and the Electric Communication Act(ECA) etc.
Main targets of these laws are virus spreading, computer hacking, cyber pornography, intellectual property breaching, private or public information abusing and cyber terrorism. These laws were revised or legislated for the purpose of attacking cyber crimes. The Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Information and Communication provide several commitments to consider the proper programme to protect private user and public sector from all kinds of cyber crimes.
Among other cybercrimes, spam mail, the unsolicited email is now illegal. It was controversial whether it should be criminally restricted or not. But since 2001 every spammer should reduce their mailing business if the computer user expresses the denial. Still we may consider the next step to reduce the spam mail and spam advertisements on mobile communication. The Korean law regulates only the opt?out methods, but I recommended recently, in my report, to the government to adopt the opt?in method. In the opt?in method, the advertisement provider must ask the customer before sending the messages. It creates us more effective to control the spammer.
Recently the unsolicited email containing commercial information is broadly accepted as an illegal commitment to endangering the network. Some reports say it could cause real damages. For the proper policy on controlling spam we need comprehensive strategy scheme. The law enforcement, communication participant and domestic Internet provider, policy maker, Internet user, and education will be cooperated. With this prevention network we could rebuild the clear and safe network. It must be enhanced the international cooperation. Without the international cooperation, all efforts could be in vain.
For the cooperative relationship, we should share the information. Poor information sharing could hamper the preventive activity in international legal enforcement. Although some countries, particularly in Asian?Pacific area, were found to have addressed a number of this broader information sharing. Few countries were able to demonstrate that adequate legal measures had been taken to ensure that perpetrators of cyber crime would be held accountable for their actions.
Outdated laws and regulations, and weak law enforcement create an environment for the illegal cyber behaviours. Inadequate legal protection of digital information can produce barriers to its exchange. As e?commerce expands globally, the strong and consistent measure for mutual information sharing will be needed. The international conventions and bilateral treaties are going to be prepared in some day.
For mitigating the impact of spam requires :
- govenrments must enhance legislation to prevent spam
- law enforcement agencies could investigate the spammers
- internet service providers(IPSs) must filter all email to remove spam prior to releasing it to recipients' inboxes
목차
국문요약
제1부 서론
제2부 광고성 전자우편의 실태와 규제법률
제3부 규율체계의 문제점과 불법구성의 한계
참고문헌
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
스팸메일에 관한 合理的인 規制方案
인터넷전자상거래연구
2002 .09
-
스팸메일(Spam Mail)에 대한 규제방안
기업법연구
2003 .03
-
소비자문제 시각에서의 스팸메일문제 대응
소비자문제연구
2008 .04
-
미국 스팸 메일 법제에 관한 연구
한국방송학보
2004 .03
-
사이버범죄 관련 법령정비 방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .02
-
스팸규제에 관한 헌법적 연구
공법학연구
2004 .12
-
정보통신망법 스팸 규제 개선 방안 연구
한국IT서비스학회지
2011 .01
-
Cultural differences in unsolicited e-mail advertising, aka SPAM
한국언론학회 심포지움 및 세미나
2009 .06
-
인터넷상의 스팸메일 법적 규제 정비방향 : 관련 법익간의 연계성 분석을 중심으로
한국언론학보
2002 .07
-
사이버범죄 예방을 위한 법제도적 해결방안 - 가칭 ‘사이버범죄 특별법’ 제정논의를 중심으로 -
원광법학
2008 .01
-
불법ㆍ유해정보의 유통방지를 위한 형사규제의 실효적 확보방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2007 .12
-
통계적 기법을 이용한 스팸메시지 필터링 기법
한국IT서비스학회지
2014 .01
-
스팸메일 방지를 위한 제도적 기술적 해결방안에 관한 연구
한국IT서비스학회지
2003 .01
-
스팸피해의 실태와 대응에 관한 고찰
피해자학연구
2011 .01
-
스팸메일의 규제동향에 관한 고찰
법과 정책연구
2005 .06
-
사이버보안 법제에 관한 연구
중앙법학
2011 .09
-
스팸과 피싱 규제법리의 새로운 전개 : 온라인광고로부터 사이버범죄로
언론과법
2008 .12
-
[제2부 과학기술ㆍ정보분야] 형사특별법의 정비 및 편입방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003834597