지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The modern age is an opened society of globalization, in which innumerable amount of information in all fields are traded. Disregarding this aspect, control over these currents are needed. Concerning this current tendency, numerous information are flooding, and we need a kind of sense to sort out some information that is of value. But we can also think that, these flooding information are invading our rights to decide whether an information is valuable or not. Everybody is granted a right to refuse information that are not needed to him/herself. right of Information, means control over one's information.
But in spite of this negative aspect of the information age, government interference is undesirable. Therefore, government intends to have the rights of each individual protected, and restricted through a safe mechanism, which is called law. If spam are regulated by law, the advent of an ideal information age would be possible. But concerning the negative aspects which the regulation will bring, we can never say that we can always profit from this action.
Now, we are in the chore of the information age, never to return. Spam matters is just one of the many problems caused in the information age. Right of self-decision is a basic right, with the rights to privacy protected, which states a criterion to perceive the meaning of value of information in a both objective and subjective way. If we have to regulate the spam matters in the age of flooding information, we would have to access the problem with a necessity of harmonizing the rights and profits of others with the essential norm. This is the method which the modern constitutional state requires. Under this perception, as far as social sympathy has been formed, and as far as people requires the government to take actions against spam-mail, some kinds of methods should be taken which is based on the agreement between "sender" and "receiver".
The Information and Communication Act must approve this by amendment. But we merely have to examine the action scrutinizingly, whether the excessive limitation which the opt-in tends to have invades the other basic right of the others to Business. And finally, laws have to be enacted under the prerequisite that the chore of the information age is the free access to information and the individual's right to privacy protected.
But in spite of this negative aspect of the information age, government interference is undesirable. Therefore, government intends to have the rights of each individual protected, and restricted through a safe mechanism, which is called law. If spam are regulated by law, the advent of an ideal information age would be possible. But concerning the negative aspects which the regulation will bring, we can never say that we can always profit from this action.
Now, we are in the chore of the information age, never to return. Spam matters is just one of the many problems caused in the information age. Right of self-decision is a basic right, with the rights to privacy protected, which states a criterion to perceive the meaning of value of information in a both objective and subjective way. If we have to regulate the spam matters in the age of flooding information, we would have to access the problem with a necessity of harmonizing the rights and profits of others with the essential norm. This is the method which the modern constitutional state requires. Under this perception, as far as social sympathy has been formed, and as far as people requires the government to take actions against spam-mail, some kinds of methods should be taken which is based on the agreement between "sender" and "receiver".
The Information and Communication Act must approve this by amendment. But we merely have to examine the action scrutinizingly, whether the excessive limitation which the opt-in tends to have invades the other basic right of the others to Business. And finally, laws have to be enacted under the prerequisite that the chore of the information age is the free access to information and the individual's right to privacy protected.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 정보국가와 스팸규제
Ⅲ. 스팸규제의 원칙과 법적 문제
Ⅳ. 스팸규제를 위한 법적ㆍ제도적 정비방안
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문과 연관된 판례 (2)
-
헌법재판소 1989. 9. 4. 선고 88헌마22 전원재판부〔위헌확인 · 기각〕
1. 헌법소원심판청구인(憲法訴願審判請求人)이 그의 불이익(不利益)으로 돌릴 수 없는 정당한 이유있는 착오로 전심절차(前審節次)를 밟지 않은 경우 또는 전심절차(前審節次)로 권리(權利)가 구제(救濟)될 가능성이 거의 없거나 권리구제절차(權利救濟節次)가 허용(許容)되는지의 여부(與否)가 객관적(客觀的)으로 불확실(不確實)하여 전심절차이
자세히 보기 -
헌법재판소 1989. 9. 8. 선고 88헌가6 全員裁判部
가. 국회의원선거법(國會議員選擧法) 제33조의 기탁금(寄託金)은 너무 과다하여 국민주권주의(國民主權主義)와 자유민주주의(自由民主主義)의 기본원칙과 관련하여 헌법(憲法) 제11조의 평등보호원칙(平等保護原則), 제24조 참정권(參政權), 제25조의 공무담임권(公務擔任權)을 침해(侵害)할 뿐만 아니라 정당추천(政黨推薦) 후보자(候補者)와 무
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
미국 스팸 메일 법제에 관한 연구
한국방송학보
2004 .03
-
The Role of Factors to Influence a Foreign Tourists’ Information Search Behavior
관광레저연구
2006 .05
-
소비자문제 시각에서의 스팸메일문제 대응
소비자문제연구
2008 .04
-
개인건강정보에 대한 열람권과 정정권 : 헌법적·비교법적 논의를 통한 현행 법제에 대한 비판적 검토
중앙법학
2010 .09
-
스팸메일(Spam Mail)에 대한 규제방안
기업법연구
2003 .03
-
인터넷상의 스팸메일 법적 규제 정비방향 : 관련 법익간의 연계성 분석을 중심으로
한국언론학보
2002 .07
-
스팸메일에 관한 合理的인 規制方案
인터넷전자상거래연구
2002 .09
-
전자통신망을 이용한 광고성 전자우편의 불법성과 형사정책
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2005 .12
-
A Look at Information Access through Physical, Intellectual, and Socio-cultural Lenses
Journal of Multicultural Society : OMNES
2011 .12
-
Constitutional Rights in the Information Society
언론과법
2002 .12
-
개인정보보호를 위한 비교법적 연구
유럽헌법연구
2019 .01
-
스팸메일 방지를 위한 제도적 기술적 해결방안에 관한 연구
한국IT서비스학회지
2003 .01
-
정보기술의 발달과 개인정보권의 보호
과학기술법연구
2006 .01
-
개인위치정보의 수집으로 인한 손해배상책임 - 대법원 2018. 5. 30. 선고 2015다251539, 251546, 251553, 251560, 251577 판결
법학논집
2020 .01
-
정보통신망법 스팸 규제 개선 방안 연구
한국IT서비스학회지
2011 .01
-
투자자세가 최적 포트폴리오에 미치는 영향 (Ⅱ)
경영학연구
1980 .03
-
스팸과 피싱 규제법리의 새로운 전개 : 온라인광고로부터 사이버범죄로
언론과법
2008 .12
-
정보공개법제의 발전과 향후 개선과제
외법논집
2008 .01
-
Arguments on Information Secrecy Made by Public Agencies in Indonesia : A Case Study in the Disputes over Access to Information, 2010-2016
Journal of Asian Sociology
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-362-016081036