지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.12
- 수록면
- 13 - 242 (232page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Generally speaking, there are three kinds of nation-wide countermeasures to drug crime: supply-level enforcement, demand-level enforcement. Since 1950's our government has had a deep concern with drug problems, and made every effort to prevent drug crimes and drug problems.
The Drug Warden as one of the drug enforcement schemes is an officer who controls, inspects, supervises or do something to need to prevent illegal distribution of legitimate drugs for medical use depending upon the Act of Controlling Drugs. As with it, there is a system of an Honorary Drug Warden who enlightens, educates, or publicize to prevent all kinds of drugs.
These two schemes are similar to the Drug Enforcement Officer in Japan and Drug Intelligence Research Specialist in U.S.A., but they are no power to arrest or investigate drug offenders in difference with the system of Japan and U.S.A. So we have a few problems to control or supervise drugs, and need to make up for the weakness of our system.
This study has two major goals: first, to reviews the practice of Drug Warden System and second, to enhance the effectiveness of supervising system of legitimate drugs for medical use.
The data are obtained from official records and e-mail surveys of 177 drug wardens.
The major research findings to reform a drug warden system are as follows:
First, we need to increase full-time man-powers who take responsibility to supervise legitimate drugs. The present drug wardens are selected among the officers from the Food and Drug Administration and public health centers of local self-governing administrative districts. So some of them have poor knowledge and skills about drug supervision.
Second, it is better to abolish the Honorary Drug Warden System, because they do nothing to prevent drug problems. It has been a waste of resources, so it will be substituted for the Korean Anti-drug Campaign Center. As the latter is a professional center to prevent or educate drug problems, it will be more effective for it to educate, publicize or make a campaign to prevent drugs.
Third, we need to increase and diversify the education programs for drug wardens and agents of drug of medical use(pharmacy, clinic, hospital.) It will contribute to enhancing the knowledge and skill of medical drug supervision and furthermore strengthening national drugs control system.
Fourth, there is a necessity for developing more intensive supervision methods. Present self-checking system must be supplemented by discriminative supervision system on the basis of risk-level of agents.
The Drug Warden as one of the drug enforcement schemes is an officer who controls, inspects, supervises or do something to need to prevent illegal distribution of legitimate drugs for medical use depending upon the Act of Controlling Drugs. As with it, there is a system of an Honorary Drug Warden who enlightens, educates, or publicize to prevent all kinds of drugs.
These two schemes are similar to the Drug Enforcement Officer in Japan and Drug Intelligence Research Specialist in U.S.A., but they are no power to arrest or investigate drug offenders in difference with the system of Japan and U.S.A. So we have a few problems to control or supervise drugs, and need to make up for the weakness of our system.
This study has two major goals: first, to reviews the practice of Drug Warden System and second, to enhance the effectiveness of supervising system of legitimate drugs for medical use.
The data are obtained from official records and e-mail surveys of 177 drug wardens.
The major research findings to reform a drug warden system are as follows:
First, we need to increase full-time man-powers who take responsibility to supervise legitimate drugs. The present drug wardens are selected among the officers from the Food and Drug Administration and public health centers of local self-governing administrative districts. So some of them have poor knowledge and skills about drug supervision.
Second, it is better to abolish the Honorary Drug Warden System, because they do nothing to prevent drug problems. It has been a waste of resources, so it will be substituted for the Korean Anti-drug Campaign Center. As the latter is a professional center to prevent or educate drug problems, it will be more effective for it to educate, publicize or make a campaign to prevent drugs.
Third, we need to increase and diversify the education programs for drug wardens and agents of drug of medical use(pharmacy, clinic, hospital.) It will contribute to enhancing the knowledge and skill of medical drug supervision and furthermore strengthening national drugs control system.
Fourth, there is a necessity for developing more intensive supervision methods. Present self-checking system must be supplemented by discriminative supervision system on the basis of risk-level of agents.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 마약류감시원제도에 관한 일반적 고찰
제3장 국내ㆍ외 유사제도에 대한 비교법적 고찰
제4장 마약류감시원들의 활동실태와 인식
제5장 마약류감시원제도의 문제점과 개선방안
참고문헌
영문요약
〈부록〉
[연구진 약력]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Drug Situation and Drug Control in Korea
형사정책연구
1994 .09
-
마약류 수요억제 및 마약류 사범 처우합리화를 위한 종합대책
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2005 .12
-
국제마약사범에 대한 특수수사방법 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2004 .12
-
우리나라 마약실태의 위험과 그 대응방안에 관한 연구
한국치안행정논집
2019 .01
-
마약류 중독자에 대한 치료현황 및 대책에 대한 연구
法學論文集
2015 .01
-
痲藥類犯罪의 實態와 需要抑制 戰略
교정연구
2002 .01
-
마약류범죄의 처벌에 대한 소고 - 연성 마약을 중심으로 -
비교형사법연구
2013 .01
-
마약류범죄에 대한 통제방안 연구
원광법학
2009 .01
-
일부 다빈도 질환에서 의료기관 유형별 의약품 사용의 변이
보건행정학회지
1999 .01
-
마약문제의 해결을 위한 각국의 전략 비교분석
한림법학 FORUM
2004 .12
-
Effects of Anti-Drug PSAs and Adolescent's Personal Characteristics on Attitude to Drug and Drug-Related Behavior
Asian Communication Research
2010 .09
-
신약도입에 따른 약품비 증가요인 분석
보건경제와 정책연구
2011 .01
-
국내 마약류 확산에 따른 합리적 대처방안
한양법학
2019 .11
-
청소년들의 약물 남용에 대한 조사 연구
한국사회안전학회지
2001 .07
-
약물사용실태 및 의식에 관한 연구(Ⅱ)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
약물사용실태 및 의식에 관한 연구(Ⅱ)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
마약류정보 관리시스템의 문제점과 개선방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2004 .12
-
마약 및 조직범죄의 형사정책적 현안과 종합적 대응방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
-
약제비 증가의 기여 요인과 영향 분석
보건경제와 정책연구
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003949817