지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In a computerized information society, criminal investigations often involve electronic surveillance in computer communications networks. Particularly, in computer crime cases, investigators may want to monitor a hacker as he breaks into a victim computer system, or to set up a “cloned" e-mail box to monitor a suspect sending or receiving crime-related informations over the Internet.
This article reviews how these electronic surveillance procedures work in criminal investigations involving computers, whether and to what extent the Protection for the Secret of Communication Act of 2002 applies to the real-time electronic surveillance in computer communications networks.
Electronic Surveillance includes real-time computer usage monitor and e-mail inspection or interception, which enable law enforcement officials to collect content information, addressing and other non-content(routing) information of electronic communications in transmission. Electronic surveillance process which captures the in-outcoming electronic or other impulses which identify the originating number or other dialing, routing, addressing, or signaling information reasonably likely to identify the source of electronic communication, but such information shall not include the contents of communication. However, the Protection for the Secret of Communication Act regulates the collection of actual content of electronic communication and the interference of transmission. For this, it is questionable whether the real-time electronic surveillance of non-content communication information can be regarded as an protective object in the sense of the Protection for the Secret of Communication Act.
In the text of Internet communication, law enforcement officers may need to trace real-time communication to a particular victim computer or an IP address. If the electronic surveillance of non-content information is not covered by the Act, electronic surveillance can create the risk of an intensive intrusion of the state into the citizen's privacy. Thus, the Act should be amended to cover the specific need of the real-time electronic surveillance for non-content information, and only so long as the information likely to be obtained is relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation, the Act should authorize a prosecutor to apply for a court order of authorizing electronic surveillance and trace.
The Protection for Communication Secrets Act of 2002 also covers e-mail inspection or interception. However it remains some debates about the legal character of the e-mail inspection. The interception of electronic communications refers only to their real-time acquisition at the time of transmission between the parties to the communications. An investigator who subsequently obtains access to a stored copy of an e-mail does not intercept the communication. Rather, the stored e-mail shoud be the subject of search and seizure.
This article reviews how these electronic surveillance procedures work in criminal investigations involving computers, whether and to what extent the Protection for the Secret of Communication Act of 2002 applies to the real-time electronic surveillance in computer communications networks.
Electronic Surveillance includes real-time computer usage monitor and e-mail inspection or interception, which enable law enforcement officials to collect content information, addressing and other non-content(routing) information of electronic communications in transmission. Electronic surveillance process which captures the in-outcoming electronic or other impulses which identify the originating number or other dialing, routing, addressing, or signaling information reasonably likely to identify the source of electronic communication, but such information shall not include the contents of communication. However, the Protection for the Secret of Communication Act regulates the collection of actual content of electronic communication and the interference of transmission. For this, it is questionable whether the real-time electronic surveillance of non-content communication information can be regarded as an protective object in the sense of the Protection for the Secret of Communication Act.
In the text of Internet communication, law enforcement officers may need to trace real-time communication to a particular victim computer or an IP address. If the electronic surveillance of non-content information is not covered by the Act, electronic surveillance can create the risk of an intensive intrusion of the state into the citizen's privacy. Thus, the Act should be amended to cover the specific need of the real-time electronic surveillance for non-content information, and only so long as the information likely to be obtained is relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation, the Act should authorize a prosecutor to apply for a court order of authorizing electronic surveillance and trace.
The Protection for Communication Secrets Act of 2002 also covers e-mail inspection or interception. However it remains some debates about the legal character of the e-mail inspection. The interception of electronic communications refers only to their real-time acquisition at the time of transmission between the parties to the communications. An investigator who subsequently obtains access to a stored copy of an e-mail does not intercept the communication. Rather, the stored e-mail shoud be the subject of search and seizure.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 컴퓨터통신망 검색 유형에 따른 감청의 허용가능성
Ⅳ. 컴퓨터 통신망 검색의 허용요건과 범위
Ⅴ. 컴퓨터통신망 검색에 있어서 감청허가서 요구의 예외
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
전자감시와 개인정보보호
법학논집
2006 .01
-
전자감시를 통한 범죄예방과 제도의 개선방안
일감법학
2011 .01
-
현행 전자거래기본법의 법적 보완과제에 관한 고찰 : UECIC 규정내용과의 비교를 중심으로
인터넷전자상거래연구
2009 .09
-
현행 전자무역촉진법의 개정방향에 관한 고찰
관세학회지
2009 .08
-
전자적 수단에 의한 근로자 감시와 노동법적 과제
노동법포럼
2009 .04
-
국제계약에 있어 전자적 의사표시의 이용에 관한 UN협약의 규정해석과 적용에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2010 .02
-
전자상거래의 입법동향에 관한 고찰
경영법률
2008 .01
-
전자서명 관련 법제의 개선과제에 관한 일고찰 : 전자서명과 전자선하증권의 국제유통성 확보를 중심으로
인터넷전자상거래연구
2010 .06
-
근로감시의 한계에 대한 법적 규율에 관한 연구
노동법학
2014 .03
-
전자무역에서 전자인증제도의 문제점과 개선방안
통상정보연구
2004 .08
-
전자화폐의 법적 문제
경영법률
2008 .01
-
전자감독제도 운영성과 분석 및 효과적인 개선방안에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
-
UNCITRAL 전자계약협약의 국내법에의 수용
비교사법
2009 .06
-
미국 전자거래관련 법제에 관한 연구-UETA를 중심으로-
인터넷전자상거래연구
2003 .02
-
전자무역에서 전자문서의 이용과 전자문서보관소
전자무역연구
2004 .01
-
전자노동감시에 대한 현행 법제의 해석과 한계
노동법논총
2015 .12
-
인터넷 電子商去來契約에서의 전자계약에 관한 연구
문화산업연구
2004 .06
-
전자수표제도에 관한 법적 검토
경영법률
2011 .01
-
일본의 휴대전화에 대한 통신감청과 위치정보추적수사
법학연구
2019 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
망 중립성(Net Neutrality)과 통신비밀보호에 관한 형사정책
전현욱
,
Ch
,
is Ma
외 2명
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014
.02
프라이버시 염려와 제도적 신뢰가 프라이버시 의사결정에 미치는 영향 : 전자상거래와 위치기반서비스의 비교
김상희
,
김종기
한국산업정보학회논문지
2017
.02
정보 프라이버시 관련 이용자 태도 및 행동 연구 : 지급결제 서비스 중심으로
허정
,
김승현
,
차남준
외 1명
정보사회와 미디어
2016
.12
빅데이터 시대의 정보 프라이버시 위험과 정책에 관한 실증 연구
박천웅
,
김준우
,
권혁준
한국전자거래학회지
2016
.02
전자노동감시에 대한 현행 법제의 해석과 한계
양승엽
노동법논총
2015
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003956925