지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The death of two middle school girls in June 2002 by an armored vehicle of United States Forces-Korea touched off "Commemorative Candlelight Vigils" throughout Korea. Since then, these candlelight vigils have become a matter of concern and interest at home and abroad. In 2003, candlelight vigils also occurred during demonstrations by residents protesting the Government's plan to install a Nuclear Waste storage in Pu-an County of North Cholla Province. Candlelight vigils now seem to be a new type of demonstration strategy.
In accordance with the Law and Regulations on Assemblies and Demonstrations(Article 13), academic seminars, artistic performances, religious events and ritual performances are exempt from regulations, prior application reporting, and time and place restrictions. Article 10 of this law, however, does not allow assemblies and demonstrations before sunrise and after sunset hours except for the aforementioned events.
These candlelight vigils, if strictly examined in accordance with the Law and Regulations on Assemblies and Demonstrations, are subject to application for prior approval. Nevertheless, these vigils seem to be an increasing trend through which protesters manipulate laws and regulations to avoid prior application reporting
Moreover, rallies and demonstrations are consecutively staged under the name of a "three-step and one-bow" march, prayers meetings and press interviews under the pretext of being religious ceremonies or cultural events. These people are not strictly observing the Law and Regulations on Assemblies and Demonstrations.
In this thesis, the actual state of candlelight vigils and other rallies and demonstrations staged under the pretext of a "three-step and one-bow" march, prayers meetings and press interviews are analyzed and examined to identify how these events are violating the Law and Regulations on Assemblies and Demonstrations.
In conclusion, a countermeasure policy is presented to balance the rights of freedom and the Law of Assemblies and Demonstrations to maintain public security for the peace and safety of our citizens.
In accordance with the Law and Regulations on Assemblies and Demonstrations(Article 13), academic seminars, artistic performances, religious events and ritual performances are exempt from regulations, prior application reporting, and time and place restrictions. Article 10 of this law, however, does not allow assemblies and demonstrations before sunrise and after sunset hours except for the aforementioned events.
These candlelight vigils, if strictly examined in accordance with the Law and Regulations on Assemblies and Demonstrations, are subject to application for prior approval. Nevertheless, these vigils seem to be an increasing trend through which protesters manipulate laws and regulations to avoid prior application reporting
Moreover, rallies and demonstrations are consecutively staged under the name of a "three-step and one-bow" march, prayers meetings and press interviews under the pretext of being religious ceremonies or cultural events. These people are not strictly observing the Law and Regulations on Assemblies and Demonstrations.
In this thesis, the actual state of candlelight vigils and other rallies and demonstrations staged under the pretext of a "three-step and one-bow" march, prayers meetings and press interviews are analyzed and examined to identify how these events are violating the Law and Regulations on Assemblies and Demonstrations.
In conclusion, a countermeasure policy is presented to balance the rights of freedom and the Law of Assemblies and Demonstrations to maintain public security for the peace and safety of our citizens.
목차
Ⅰ. 序言
Ⅱ. 主要集會ㆍ示威事例및 分析
Ⅲ. 宗敎文化行事名目의 集會ㆍ示威의 問題點
Ⅳ. 集示法 適用與否 檢討
Ⅴ. 對應方案
Ⅵ. 結論
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
현행 집시법의 주요 쟁점과 개정 방향
경찰학연구
2008 .12
-
항만해상집회·시위의 규제에 대한 고찰
한양법학
2013 .02
-
정부의 집회시위 대응방안 연구
치안정책연구
2009 .01
-
「집회 및 시위에 관한 법률」 상 소음규정에 대한 문제점과 개선방안
치안정책연구
2019 .01
-
촛불시위와 한국정치 : 원인과 과제
현대정치연구
2009 .04
-
1인 시위와 촛불시위의 정치철학적 의미 : 한나 아렌트적 해석
민주주의와 인권
2010 .12
-
한국형 집회·시위 문화 정착을 위한 과제: 시민과 경찰 간의 분화적 인식을 중심으로
한국경찰연구
2015 .01
-
구 집회 및 시위에 관한 법률상 집회의 개념과 사전신고 및 미신고 집회시 형벌 규정에 대한 헌법적 평가 : 헌법재판소 2009. 5. 28, 2007헌바22결정에 대한 비판을 중심으로
중앙법학
2009 .10
-
건전한 집회시위문화 조성방안
한국공안행정학회보
2005 .01
-
집회 및 시위의 자유 : 미국의 경우를 중심으로
서강법학
2009 .06
-
헌법재판소의 야간옥외집회금지와 처벌규정의 결정에 대한 연구 - 헌법재판소 2009. 9. 24, 2008헌가25 결정에 대한 평석 -
외법논집
2009 .01
-
야간 옥외집회 및 시위에 관한 법규정의 공백에 따른 방향 설정을 위한 비교법적 고찰
法學論文集
2012 .01
-
촛불에 남겨진 뜨거운 감자, 정당정치
시민과세계
2008 .12
-
경찰의 집회시위 관리에 대한 인식태도 비교 연구
한국공안행정학회보
2006 .01
-
집회 및 시위에 관한 법률상 집회·시위소음 규제 조항의 문제점 및 개선방안
인권과 정의
2018 .01
-
불법 · 폭력시위 근절을 위한 경찰의 기능강화 방안
한국경찰학회보
2008 .01
-
집회 및 시위의 보장과 규제에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2002 .12
-
집회 및 시위에 대한 경찰권 행사의 근거 및 한계
원광법학
2008 .01
-
촛불집회와 집합지성 - 토의민주주의적 해석
민주주의와 인권
2010 .04
-
국제인권기준에 비춰본 한국의 집회․시위 대응
치안정책연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003968790