메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역학회 무역학회지 貿易學會誌 第25卷 第4號
발행연도
2000.12
수록면
153 - 184 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since the Section 301 was introduced in 1974 Trade Act, it has been invoked consistently until now, although it was criticized strongly by many trading partners. Some of supporters and the policymakers in the United States have emphasized that it is an inevitable instrument to realize the free-fair trade system among the trading partners. On the other hand, critics have asserted that it is a result of U.S. aggressive unilateralism as an economic hagemon. However, it is true that the availability of Section 301 has been quite much reduced after WTO/DSU is settled down and takes its place as an integrated mechanism of trade dispute settlement. So what is the future of Section 301 is a very important question. But, in our opinion, Section 301 will be invoked continuously even in the future because its operation is to be influenced by the politics and lobbing of various interest groups in the United States. The question is whether the number of invocation of Section 301 will be reduced or not. In addition, the discretionary Section 301 seems to be operated mainly to strengthen U.S. market opportunities on the basis of the contestable-market theory, because it is beyond the WTO covered agreements.

목차

Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 通商法 301條의 實體的 規定
Ⅲ. 通商法 301條 適用實態
Ⅳ. 通商法 301條에 관한 論爭 및 WTO體制下에서의 有用性
Ⅴ. 結論
參考文獻
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-326-002879218