메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
河世鳳 (한국해양대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第200輯
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
1 - 31 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article sums up the past 10 year's studies and the results in East Asian history conducted in the field of Korean History. It first examines how the discourse of East Asia, which is a main stream discourse in the Korean academic circle, has influenced the history studies taking East Asia as the unit of study. There seems not much relation between the discourse of East Asia and the actual historical studies of East Asia, which may reflect the lack of messages the discourse can offer to the study of history. Secondly, studies in East Asian history are characterized by considerable outcomes from collective researches. However, collective studies needed to be organically related, because studies conducted so far are considered no more than adding up individual studies. Another characteristic is that the Korean studies of East Asian history intervene in the overseas academic field and vice versa.
History studies of modem East Asia in Korea are classified into four areas: The economic history from the viewpoint of comparison or relationship, the study on the circulation of knowledge and information and mutual recognition, the study on frontiers, areas and the diaspora, and the study on the memory and representation. These studies either compare the relationship between Korea and China or between Korea and Japan, or analyze the relationship between two countries along with the third country. Studies on the history of Manchuria are remarkable, and the studies on knowledge and information circulated among countries, especially on one country's perception of the other, were conducted a lot. The studies on memory and representation are deconstructing the modernistic or nationalistic perception of history.
I suggested several directions for furthering studies in history of East Asia. The studies need to be conceptualized and synthesized, and to be extended toward multiple relations and networks, and to activate city-based or locally-oriented East Asian researches in order to shape East Asian history in a diverse way.

목차

Ⅰ. 동아시아사와 동아시아담론 간의 거리
Ⅱ. 연구의 생산과 유통방식의 변화
Ⅲ. 연구의 성과와 내용
Ⅳ. 전망을 위한 제언
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (98)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002972166