지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第130輯
- 발행연도
- 2014.6
- 수록면
- 1 - 39 (39page)
- DOI
- 10.18622/kher.2014.06.130.1
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I surveyed 291 high school students and 11 history teachers, who have been teaching and learning <EAH>, on their perception and change in their thought about <EAH>.
The history teachers’ preference on <EAH> was quite low. The reason is not only the stress about new subject, but also they did not fully agree on the purpose of <EAH>. Teachers suggested that the Ministry of Education should release the anxiety of the fact that <EAH> might be abolished, and try to change the perception by promoting the purpose of the subject’s establishment. Also, they pointed out that the topic approach of <EAH> textbook is difficult for students, so the periodical overview should be added.
The students’ preference on <EAH> was higher than that of teachers’. The students who picked <EAH> in high school are more likely to choose <EAH> in the scholastic ability test. It was 10.5 times more than the other students. Also, the percentage of students who wanted to learn <EAH> before the class was 56%. But after the c lass, the p ercentage of t hose who planned to take <EAH> in the scholastic ability test increased to 65%. This shows that satisfaction of the class can change the choice of subject in the scholastic ability test.
The history teachers’ preference on <EAH> was quite low. The reason is not only the stress about new subject, but also they did not fully agree on the purpose of <EAH>. Teachers suggested that the Ministry of Education should release the anxiety of the fact that <EAH> might be abolished, and try to change the perception by promoting the purpose of the subject’s establishment. Also, they pointed out that the topic approach of <EAH> textbook is difficult for students, so the periodical overview should be added.
The students’ preference on <EAH> was higher than that of teachers’. The students who picked <EAH> in high school are more likely to choose <EAH> in the scholastic ability test. It was 10.5 times more than the other students. Also, the percentage of students who wanted to learn <EAH> before the class was 56%. But after the c lass, the p ercentage of t hose who planned to take <EAH> in the scholastic ability test increased to 65%. This shows that satisfaction of the class can change the choice of subject in the scholastic ability test.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 조사 대상과 방법
3. <동아시아사>에 대한 역사교사들의 인식
4. <동아시아사>에 대한 학생들의 인식 분석
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
역사교사의 역사교육 목적에 관한 사례 연구 : 심층 면담과 수업 관찰을 중심으로
白銀珍
역사교육
2014
.09
유럽중심주의 담론을 통해 본 역사교육의 과제 : 포스트모더니즘과 포스트콜로니얼리즘의 도전
姜鮮珠
역사교육
2014
.09
역사교과서의 사회문화적 기능과 국가 이데올로기
金漢宗
역사교육
2014
.09
현행 교육과정 초ㆍ중ㆍ고 한국사 내용 구성의 문제점과 개선 방안 : 계열성을 중심으로
文載景
,
方智嫄
역사교육
2014
.09
고등학교 『동아시아사』 의 《17세기 전후 동아시아 전쟁》 분석
차미희
한국사학보
2014
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-370-001692375