지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the surrounding area near the cultural assets, the construction, building and something affecting to the preservation of the historic monuments are possible only when they get the legal permission of the Cultural Properties Protection Committee that is set up by the Cultural Properties Protection Law. As the result of the legal process, the historical monuments have been recognized as the obstruction against the development of the concerned regions. At the times of the renovation in Gyeonggi province, we need to take a proper step that enable us to take the historical monuments not as the hinderance against development but as the golden advantage by using them appropriately.
In this study, through synthesizing the cultural assets protection policy and urban planning process, we intend to foster proper measures that can enable us to harmonize building control with historical monuments.
The building control near the historical monuments had been specified on the building law before. However, since the deliberation system controlling the surrounding area near the cultural assets has been introduced, the building control near cultural monuments is being prescribed on the Cultural Properties Protection Law. In Gyeonggi province, there are 734 national historical monuments and 524 regional historical monuments. Through examining the results about the applications for the building permission near the historical monuments, the permission rate by the Cultural Properties Protection Committee was only 35 %. In the aspects of the causes for nonpermissions, the committee are indicating the reservation of landscape as the justification for the nonpermissions. Therefore, we can easily know that the purpose of building control near the historical monuments is extended to the protection of landscape in the surrounding area of the cultural assets.
The problems that we want to point out for the deliberation system controlling the surrounding area near the cultural assets are as follows.
Firstly, the deliberation system is too leaning toward to legal regulations.
Secondly, the permission yardsticks used in the deliberation are some uniformally standardizations without consideration for the characteristic locations of the respective monuments.
Thirdly, the building control system is only for the monuments themselves, not considering how the concerned area near the historical monuments should be developed.
Fourthly, there is not any financial support or any tax favor that should be properly given to the owners of lands and buildings near the monuments.
About the deliberation system controlling the surrounding area near the cultural assets, the improvements we want to suggest are as follows.
○ Understanding correctly the historical monuments
We need to give the person to understand that the cultural assets are not obstructions against the development but the opportunities for the development and economical growth by informing the examples of the advanced nations such as France and Italy.
○ Establishing supporting system for the surrounding area
We need to compensate appropriately the building owners in the concerned area for the building regulations.
○ Establishing the special law for supporting Historical landscape
We need to integrate the urban planning process and cultural assets protections policy. In addition, We suggest the special law in which the financial support and substantial land use can be realized.
○ Formulating the masterplan for conservation of Cultural assets
In Gyeonggi province and self-government bodies, we should formulate the masterplan for the development of the concerned area and the historical monument. In addition, we need to make a specific urban-planning measures for the development of the surrounding area
○ Harmonizing the control to the urban planning measures
If it is impossible for us to formulate the masterplan, the deliberation process for the building permission near the historical monuments should be connected to the urban planning process by using the methods of the urban basic plan, zoning and urban design or by defining the specific methods on the urban basic plan like France case.
○ Improving the permission yardsticks used in the deliberation
As the feasible method in short term process, we can suggest that the deliberation systems for the building permissions should be revised. For this purpose, the direction of development and management in the surrounding area should be established clearly.
In this study, through synthesizing the cultural assets protection policy and urban planning process, we intend to foster proper measures that can enable us to harmonize building control with historical monuments.
The building control near the historical monuments had been specified on the building law before. However, since the deliberation system controlling the surrounding area near the cultural assets has been introduced, the building control near cultural monuments is being prescribed on the Cultural Properties Protection Law. In Gyeonggi province, there are 734 national historical monuments and 524 regional historical monuments. Through examining the results about the applications for the building permission near the historical monuments, the permission rate by the Cultural Properties Protection Committee was only 35 %. In the aspects of the causes for nonpermissions, the committee are indicating the reservation of landscape as the justification for the nonpermissions. Therefore, we can easily know that the purpose of building control near the historical monuments is extended to the protection of landscape in the surrounding area of the cultural assets.
The problems that we want to point out for the deliberation system controlling the surrounding area near the cultural assets are as follows.
Firstly, the deliberation system is too leaning toward to legal regulations.
Secondly, the permission yardsticks used in the deliberation are some uniformally standardizations without consideration for the characteristic locations of the respective monuments.
Thirdly, the building control system is only for the monuments themselves, not considering how the concerned area near the historical monuments should be developed.
Fourthly, there is not any financial support or any tax favor that should be properly given to the owners of lands and buildings near the monuments.
About the deliberation system controlling the surrounding area near the cultural assets, the improvements we want to suggest are as follows.
○ Understanding correctly the historical monuments
We need to give the person to understand that the cultural assets are not obstructions against the development but the opportunities for the development and economical growth by informing the examples of the advanced nations such as France and Italy.
○ Establishing supporting system for the surrounding area
We need to compensate appropriately the building owners in the concerned area for the building regulations.
○ Establishing the special law for supporting Historical landscape
We need to integrate the urban planning process and cultural assets protections policy. In addition, We suggest the special law in which the financial support and substantial land use can be realized.
○ Formulating the masterplan for conservation of Cultural assets
In Gyeonggi province and self-government bodies, we should formulate the masterplan for the development of the concerned area and the historical monument. In addition, we need to make a specific urban-planning measures for the development of the surrounding area
○ Harmonizing the control to the urban planning measures
If it is impossible for us to formulate the masterplan, the deliberation process for the building permission near the historical monuments should be connected to the urban planning process by using the methods of the urban basic plan, zoning and urban design or by defining the specific methods on the urban basic plan like France case.
○ Improving the permission yardsticks used in the deliberation
As the feasible method in short term process, we can suggest that the deliberation systems for the building permissions should be revised. For this purpose, the direction of development and management in the surrounding area should be established clearly.
목차
제1장 서론
제2장 문화재 관련기준 및 현상변경 허가현황
제3장 문화재주변 건축규제 사례연구
제4장 문화재주변 건축규제 개선방안
제5장 결론
참고문헌
부록
ABSTRACT
연구요약
머리말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
가축천연기념물의 보호를 위한 입법과제에 관한 연구
원광법학
2014 .01
-
Monuments, Memory, and Identity: Constructing the Colonial Past in South Korea
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2012 .01
-
‘멕시코혁명기념건축물’과 혁명 기억의 재건
라틴아메리카연구
2016 .11
-
숙의를 통한 비판과학 관점의 통합 지향적 가정교과 교육과정 개발
Human Ecology Research
2015 .01
-
알렌컬렉션 황실문화재 관광자원 활성화방안
한국서비스경영학회 학술대회
2017 .11
-
공론화를 통한 사회적 합의형성의 성공조건
한국정책과학학회보
2018 .03
-
서울시 도시문화시설의 입지특성에 관한 연구
한국지역개발학회 학술대회
2010 .11
-
대의 민주주의에서 숙의 그리고 공론: 의미와 적용
비교민주주의연구
2020 .01
-
중국의 문물(文物) 보호에 관한 주요법제 고찰
동북아법연구
2011 .01
-
공론화의 숙의 효과에 대한 실증분석: 2022학년도 대입제도개편 공론화 경험을 중심으로
정책분석평가학회보
2020 .06
-
역사문화자원을 활용한 가로 정비사업의 계획특성에 관한연구 : 대한민국 경관대상 수상작을 중심으로
주거환경
2015 .03
-
開發行爲許可가 擬制되는 建築許可 拒否處分에 대한 司法審査 基準 및 審査强度
행정판례연구
2018 .01
-
진주성 주변의 도시공간구조 특성 연구
주거환경
2014 .09
-
서울시 역사도심 특성관리지구 실현 방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2016 .12
-
새로운 도시계획 수립기법 개발 및 서울시 적용방안 연구 : 시나리오형 계획기법 중심으로
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2011 .12
-
수원시 도시개발과정을 통한 시가지형태의 변화에 관한 연구
도시행정학보
2000 .12
-
개정 경관법에 따른 서울시 경관정책 개선방향 연구
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2014 .05
-
매장문화재 보호제도의 개선방안
중앙법학
2002 .09
-
Urban Development and Culture in Korea
한국문화정책학회 학술대회논문집
2014 .05
-
세계유산 ‘개성역사유적지구’의 보존 · 활용 방안 연구
현대북한연구
2013 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
문화재 보전과 도시계획 연계를 통한 역사문화환경 관리방안 연구 : 가나자와(金沢)시와 서울시 종로구의 비교
장민영
,
이명훈
국토계획
2011
.02
문화재의 지속가능한 보호를 위한 법제의 개선방안
우성기
행정법연구
2011
.12
역사마을의 참여형 보존관리계획을 위한 제도적 접근방식에 관한 연구 : 하회ㆍ양동마을 보존협의체 지원조례의 특성 분석을 중심으로
강현미
,
박소현
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2011
.03
경기도 결합개발제도 도입방안
이성룡
,
봉인식
,
김영빈
정책연구
2010
.09
Legal geoheritages: their values and meanings
이광춘
지질학회지
2014
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-309-002943743