지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article, are the status of the Joseon ports which were opened by treaties, and the activities of the Joseon merchants, in a Northeast Asian network of sailing routes which connected various places throughout the region, after the three countries, Joseon, China and Japan, established a series of trade agreements among them. This network of regular maritime traffics allowed entities come and go between various places beyond the borders of the countries, and strengthened the connection between those various places.
And at important passage points, which served as gateways for human exchanges and exchange of materials, there were no other than the treaty-opened ports positioned, which had earlier been opened by international treaties. Foreign merchants were allowed to reside and trade in those opened ports. And domestic merchants, either in the vicinity or from distant regions, opened businesses there as well, and explored possibilities of extending their transactions to open ports in other areas.
It was primarily the Chinese merchants(華商) and the Japanese merchants(日商) who played a major role in establishing regular sailing routes and conducting international trades. But the trade block they established was not to be used by merely themselves. Admittedly the Joseon merchants' activities were weak in the beginning, yet there were active ones among them, and such cases were increasing. With ports opened up in Joseon, foreign merchants from the outside, and Joseon's own domestic merchants from other regions, began immediately to gather there, and the regular sailing routes served as a basis for their trade activities and their efforts to expand their influences.
From sources such as 『Qingji Zhong-Ri-Han guanxi shiliao(淸季中日韓關係史料)』, we can obtain detailed information concerning the Joseon merchants who were stretching their legs to China(the Qing dynasty): their types[origins], purpose of visits, traveled routes, their base of operations, the conditions they met, and the goods and commodities they dealt with. We can also see how the Joseon and Qing governments’ treatment of those Joseon merchants varied, and how the regulations regarding such treatments have changed over the years, especially between before and after the signing of a modern treaty or agreement. Also, from sources such as 『仁川港警察所商船憑票摘奸成冊(Records of Merchant Ships Monitoring and Certificate Fabrication Prosecution, of the Incheon Port Police Department)』, which was a record of inspection of the Joseon people who came and went through opened ports inside and outside Joseon aboard steamships departing from Incheon for commercial runs, we can have a glimpse at the Joseon merchants who were expanding their realm of activities in the 1880s and 1890s.
Earlier studies concentrated upon examining the competitions (of foreign countries) that continued inside Korea over the issue of taking control of the Joseon market, and the Joseon people's response to that. Hopefully in the future, studies will be able to cover a wider range of issues, in order to escape a perspective that views only Japan and China as the major driving forces of the late 19th century East Asian economy.
And at important passage points, which served as gateways for human exchanges and exchange of materials, there were no other than the treaty-opened ports positioned, which had earlier been opened by international treaties. Foreign merchants were allowed to reside and trade in those opened ports. And domestic merchants, either in the vicinity or from distant regions, opened businesses there as well, and explored possibilities of extending their transactions to open ports in other areas.
It was primarily the Chinese merchants(華商) and the Japanese merchants(日商) who played a major role in establishing regular sailing routes and conducting international trades. But the trade block they established was not to be used by merely themselves. Admittedly the Joseon merchants' activities were weak in the beginning, yet there were active ones among them, and such cases were increasing. With ports opened up in Joseon, foreign merchants from the outside, and Joseon's own domestic merchants from other regions, began immediately to gather there, and the regular sailing routes served as a basis for their trade activities and their efforts to expand their influences.
From sources such as 『Qingji Zhong-Ri-Han guanxi shiliao(淸季中日韓關係史料)』, we can obtain detailed information concerning the Joseon merchants who were stretching their legs to China(the Qing dynasty): their types[origins], purpose of visits, traveled routes, their base of operations, the conditions they met, and the goods and commodities they dealt with. We can also see how the Joseon and Qing governments’ treatment of those Joseon merchants varied, and how the regulations regarding such treatments have changed over the years, especially between before and after the signing of a modern treaty or agreement. Also, from sources such as 『仁川港警察所商船憑票摘奸成冊(Records of Merchant Ships Monitoring and Certificate Fabrication Prosecution, of the Incheon Port Police Department)』, which was a record of inspection of the Joseon people who came and went through opened ports inside and outside Joseon aboard steamships departing from Incheon for commercial runs, we can have a glimpse at the Joseon merchants who were expanding their realm of activities in the 1880s and 1890s.
Earlier studies concentrated upon examining the competitions (of foreign countries) that continued inside Korea over the issue of taking control of the Joseon market, and the Joseon people's response to that. Hopefully in the future, studies will be able to cover a wider range of issues, in order to escape a perspective that views only Japan and China as the major driving forces of the late 19th century East Asian economy.
목차
머리말
1. 정기 해운망의 형성과 조선상인의 청국 진출
2. 인천항을 기축으로 한 조선상인의 국내외 활동양상
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
목포 개항장 상인층의 존재양태와 그 성격
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .05
-
화교 · 화인의 시점에서 본 아시아 속 조선 개항
역사비평
2016 .02
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
1930년대 중후반 식민지 조선 금융기구 개편론의 전개와 함의
한국사연구
2020 .09
-
환웅, 삼조선과 부여ㆍ고구려ㆍ요ㆍ금ㆍ원ㆍ청의 계보 : 지식형태사에 입각한 한국과 방계의 역사
고조선단군학
2007 .06
-
‘고조선’조와 ‘전조선기’로 본 고조선의 역사적 실체 재인식
고조선단군학
2012 .05
-
조선시대 對馬島 연구의 현황과 과제
동북아역사논총
2013 .09
-
1920년대 開闢社의 조선지식 수집과 조선연구 토대 구축 - ‘조선문화 기본조사’의 추진과정과 내용 분석을 중심으로
역사연구
2019 .06
-
개항장객주의 변모 양상과 성격 고찰
한일관계사연구
2013 .04
-
개항기 査證으로서의 ‘護照’ 제도의 도입과 운영
역사학보
2016 .03
-
1915년 조선물산공진회에 나타난 식민 권력의 이미지 구축 시도 -미술관 전시를 중심으로
탐라문화
2020 .01
-
歷史敎育에 있어서 映像資料의 活用 - -EBS 다큐멘터리 “商人의 나라, 中國”의 分析을 中心으로-
대구사학
2004 .01
-
『朝鮮賦』의 한중일 간행과 유통
장서각
2015 .04
-
일본의 武士와 조선 文士의 정신세계 －무사도와 선비정신의 비교연구－
日本學硏究
2011 .01
-
조선시대 중국 서사의 수용 양상과상인 애정관의 면모
한문학논집(漢文學論集)
2019 .01
-
개성상인과 일본 오미[近江] 상인의 비교 연구 - 그 기원과 정치권력과의 관계를 중심으로 -
역사와실학
2019 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
공간구조의 비교를 통해 본 한국개항도시의 식민지적 성격 : 한국과 중국의 개항도시 비교를 중심으로
김주관
한국독립운동사연구
2012
.08
한국 개항기(1876~1910) 중국의 治外法權 적용 논리와 한국의 대응 : 韓中間 조약 체결 과정을 중심으로
李銀子
동양사학연구
2005
.09
開港期 仁川 華商 네트워크와 華僑 정착의 특징
정혜중
중국근현대사연구
2007
.12
1940년대 초 인천지역 화교사회의 동향 : 인천광역시립박물관 소장 1942년 화교자료의 분석을 중심으로
배성수
인천학연구
2016
.02
日帝時期 在韓華僑(1910～1931) : 仁川地域 華僑를 중심으로
김영신
인천학연구
2005
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002248232