지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the Koryo dynasty, there was a unit serving king in many ways. It was called Nae-si (內侍), which means the Palace Attendant. They were chosen from the civil official. So they held two posts: the Palace Attendant and a civil official title. Then, why did the palace attendance hold a civil official at the same time? It is the main issue of this paper.
The Koryo dynasty imported many parts of political systems of the Tang dynasty. Among of them, there were systems of ranking and official titles. The ranking titles[ san-gye, 散階] in the Tang functioned as positions of each official and official titles[職官] meant duties of the officials. However, the Koryo adopt to in a different way. For example, when an official was appointed at any post of unit for local administration like commissioner[sa, 使], deputy(or vice) commissioner[ bu-sa, 副使], controller-general[ pan-gwan, 判官] and chief-secretary[ chang-so-gi, 掌書記] and so on, he had to hold two kinds of official titles: one is a capital official, the other is a post for local administration. In this case, a capital official is a title for his rank and a post for local administration means his duty.
We can see this feature in managing to the Palace Attendant. The Palace Attendant served the King as the messengers of King’s command or the managers of Royal temples and storages and so on. But they didn't have any financial rewards for their services as the Palace Attendant. And a civil official which the Palace Attendant held didn’t perform any duty given itself. Instead of its own duty, it was decided to take positions of the Palace Attendant in kinds of the national ceremonies or to set level of salary of the Palace Attendant.
As the result, a title called the Palace Attendant of the Koryo shows their tasks like managing the temples, a civil official what he has decides his salary and rank. This is the reason for an official been the Palace Attendant to have a civil office at the same time. If one official hold two posts, we say; “he held concurrently officials[兼職].” So I think this phrase to be applied to the relation between the Palace Attendant and a civil official title.
In addition, the Palace Attendant has a keypoint distinguished from other officials. It is an appointment form. Whatever they are on the civil's or the military’s, ordinary officials are appointed by administrative forms which was called Bi (批) or Pan(判) document depended on whether the courtier[Consultants-in-ordinary, cham-sang-gwan, ?上官] or not. But the Palace Attendant is appointed by King’s edict, Sunji (宣旨). And the Palace Attendant is also listed up on the Special Register for Nae-si[ Nae-si-jok, 內侍籍].
The Koryo dynasty imported many parts of political systems of the Tang dynasty. Among of them, there were systems of ranking and official titles. The ranking titles[ san-gye, 散階] in the Tang functioned as positions of each official and official titles[職官] meant duties of the officials. However, the Koryo adopt to in a different way. For example, when an official was appointed at any post of unit for local administration like commissioner[sa, 使], deputy(or vice) commissioner[ bu-sa, 副使], controller-general[ pan-gwan, 判官] and chief-secretary[ chang-so-gi, 掌書記] and so on, he had to hold two kinds of official titles: one is a capital official, the other is a post for local administration. In this case, a capital official is a title for his rank and a post for local administration means his duty.
We can see this feature in managing to the Palace Attendant. The Palace Attendant served the King as the messengers of King’s command or the managers of Royal temples and storages and so on. But they didn't have any financial rewards for their services as the Palace Attendant. And a civil official which the Palace Attendant held didn’t perform any duty given itself. Instead of its own duty, it was decided to take positions of the Palace Attendant in kinds of the national ceremonies or to set level of salary of the Palace Attendant.
As the result, a title called the Palace Attendant of the Koryo shows their tasks like managing the temples, a civil official what he has decides his salary and rank. This is the reason for an official been the Palace Attendant to have a civil office at the same time. If one official hold two posts, we say; “he held concurrently officials[兼職].” So I think this phrase to be applied to the relation between the Palace Attendant and a civil official title.
In addition, the Palace Attendant has a keypoint distinguished from other officials. It is an appointment form. Whatever they are on the civil's or the military’s, ordinary officials are appointed by administrative forms which was called Bi (批) or Pan(判) document depended on whether the courtier[Consultants-in-ordinary, cham-sang-gwan, ?上官] or not. But the Palace Attendant is appointed by King’s edict, Sunji (宣旨). And the Palace Attendant is also listed up on the Special Register for Nae-si[ Nae-si-jok, 內侍籍].
목차
머리말
1. 내시 운영의 실제 : 입속(入屬)에서 삭적(削籍)까지
2. 내시의 임명방식과 본품관직
3. 내시와 문반관직의 관계
맺음말
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
高麗前期 內侍의 構成과 役割
한국사학보
2002 .09
-
高麗 內侍制의 成立
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2006 .06
-
高麗時代의 內侍 : 그 別稱과 構成을 중심으로
역사교육
2002 .03
-
고려 전기 內侍와 국정운영
한국사연구
2007 .12
-
高麗 毅宗代의 王權과 內侍
사학연구
2009 .09
-
이봉정과 조귀수 : 내시의 바른 말, 내시의 허튼 짓
인물과사상
2017 .07
-
朝鮮 宣祖代 扈聖功臣 延陽君派 內侍 金繼韓 家系의 복원
역사민속학
2016 .06
-
高麗時代의 朝官內侍
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2002 .09
-
Les Conditions D’une Lecture Argumentative du Morphème-(ⅰ)na
어학연구
2000 .09
-
Tennyson’s Poetics of Sorrow in “Mariana” and “The Palace of Art”
영어영문학연구
2007 .01
-
平安漢詩文化圈と女性 : その屈折した二重性を中心に
일본문화학보
2006 .05
-
[논문]조선왕조 내시부(內侍府)의 구성과 내시(內侍) 수효의 변천
역사와현실
2004 .06
-
月池宮 관련 자료 재검토 — 東宮은 太子宮이 아니다 —
동양고전연구
2014 .01
-
Presupposition and Discourse Functions of the particle -(i)na in Korean
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2003 .06
-
ON THE DISTRIBUTION AND SCOPAL BEHAVIORS OF NUMERAL CLASSIFIER-TO/-(I)NA IN KOREAN
언어학
2002 .08
-
演戱詩 <復次韻> <驅儺行>을 통해 본 고려시대 나례의 공연양상
돈암어문학
2005 .12
-
新羅의 宦官 官府에 대한 試論 : 洗宅(중사성)의 성격에 대한 재검토
목간과문자
2018 .12
-
Ancient Palaces in Seoul
Korea Journal
1963 .08
-
高句麗 安鶴宮 中央 建築群에 대한 考察 -前殿 高臺建築 形制의 채용을 중심으로-
중국사연구
2008 .01
-
[논문] 고려 현종대 정치와 이계(吏系) 관료
역사와현실
2005 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002248212