지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to examine the concept of the 'civilization' especially in relation to that of the 'culture' and then to propose the proper way of studying the history of civilizations.
Etymologically, the meaning of the civilization is related to the 'city', while the culture is to the ruralness. But these two words have been used as the synonym until the age of the Enlightenment. After the French Revolution, German intellectuals opposing the expansion of the French 'civilization' proposed the German 'culture' as higher value. It is by them that the concept of the civilization is limited to the material and artificial aspects and that of the culture to the spiritual and creative aspects. The conceptual division was exposed radically after the World War I. But, since the World War II, this conceptual difference, even hostility disappeared. In short, the conceptual division is not universal but a German creation, and is no longer valid.
Nowadays, civilization is not used as the antonym of the savagery, either. There isn't one, unique civilization, which is european. There coexist various civilizations such as european civilization, asian civilization, ancient civilization, modern civilization, etc. The meaning of culture is no longer resistant and exclusive. Surely, it should not used as such. We should be assured that the conceptual antagonism of the civilization and the culture which has been manifest in the use of the Korean intellectuals since the era of the Japanese occupation is not a fact but a fiction made by the German intellectuals. Moreover, we should not forget the historical fact that the German culturalism is responsible for the destruction of the european civilization in the twentieth century.
For the historians, the useful meaning of the civilization is the movement. The civilization is movement, as is the life. Once petrified, it falls into the death. But, as it leaves a historical vestige even after the death, it can be said the civilization continues to be historically. One civilization meets inevitably another one, and, by doing so, creates another higher one. The civilization is communication, as well. No civilization is isolated. The history of civilization should aim to explain the civilization in relation to its context or its structure.
Etymologically, the meaning of the civilization is related to the 'city', while the culture is to the ruralness. But these two words have been used as the synonym until the age of the Enlightenment. After the French Revolution, German intellectuals opposing the expansion of the French 'civilization' proposed the German 'culture' as higher value. It is by them that the concept of the civilization is limited to the material and artificial aspects and that of the culture to the spiritual and creative aspects. The conceptual division was exposed radically after the World War I. But, since the World War II, this conceptual difference, even hostility disappeared. In short, the conceptual division is not universal but a German creation, and is no longer valid.
Nowadays, civilization is not used as the antonym of the savagery, either. There isn't one, unique civilization, which is european. There coexist various civilizations such as european civilization, asian civilization, ancient civilization, modern civilization, etc. The meaning of culture is no longer resistant and exclusive. Surely, it should not used as such. We should be assured that the conceptual antagonism of the civilization and the culture which has been manifest in the use of the Korean intellectuals since the era of the Japanese occupation is not a fact but a fiction made by the German intellectuals. Moreover, we should not forget the historical fact that the German culturalism is responsible for the destruction of the european civilization in the twentieth century.
For the historians, the useful meaning of the civilization is the movement. The civilization is movement, as is the life. Once petrified, it falls into the death. But, as it leaves a historical vestige even after the death, it can be said the civilization continues to be historically. One civilization meets inevitably another one, and, by doing so, creates another higher one. The civilization is communication, as well. No civilization is isolated. The history of civilization should aim to explain the civilization in relation to its context or its structure.
목차
1. 머리말
2. ‘문명’과 ‘문화’의 개념사
3. 문명의 팽창과 문화의 저항
4. 역사가들의 문명사 연구
5. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『독립신문』·『매일신문』에 수용된 ‘문명/야만’담론의 의미 층위
국어국문학
2004 .05
-
A Comparative Study of Several Issues Between the Indus Civilization and the Ancient Shu Civilization
중국어문학논집
2015 .06
-
동서 ‘문화⋅문명’의 개념과 그 전개 - 현대 문명 담론의 개념적 이해를 중심으로 -
동양철학연구
2010 .01
-
Three Kingdoms and Their Civilization
Korea Journal
1964 .07
-
歷史에서 본 韓日關係와 文明轉換
역사교육
2013 .12
-
College and the Creation of a New Civilization
Korea Journal
1968 .08
-
1890년대 후반 '문명' 개념의 확산과 문명 인식
한국사연구
2010 .06
-
강증산의 ‘개벽’과 새로운 문명
대순사상논총
2019 .01
-
Philosophical Foundation of Korean Civilization
Korea Journal
1963 .04
-
협력문명의 사회적 기원―협력공동체의 형성과 해체에 관한 문명사적 탐색―
민족문화연구
2020 .01
-
Philosophical Foundation of Korean Civilization and Course of its Development
Korea Journal
1963 .03
-
정지용 시의 문명 인식
한국시학연구
2002 .11
-
Protestantism in the Name of Modern Civilization
Korea Journal
1999 .12
-
이광수와 식민지 문명화론
서강인문논총
2010 .04
-
基督敎가 韓國女性의 開化에 미친 影響
경주사학
1982 .12
-
雲養 金允植의 文明觀
한국인물사연구
2015 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
서구 중심주의 역사학에 대한 비판과 반비판 : 페르낭 브로델을 중심으로
김응종
프랑스사 연구
2007
.02
아날학파와 역사의 공간화 : 페르낭 브로델(주경철 옮김), 『물질문명과 자본주의 Ⅰ-일상생활의 구조』2권, 까치, 1995. 자크 르 고프(최애리 옮김), 『연옥의 탄생』, 문학과지성사, 1995
김응종
황해문화
1995
.12
몽타이유 사람들의 일상생활 : 엠마뉘엘 르루아 라뒤리, 유희수 옮김, 『몽타이유: 중세 말 남프랑스 어느 마을 사람들의 삶』(서울, 길, 2006), 779pp
김응종
코기토
2007
.02
토마스 홉스와 무신론
김응종
역사와 담론
2010
.04
1890년대 후반 '문명' 개념의 확산과 문명 인식
노대환
한국사연구
2010
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018913089