지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to examine if Thomas Hobbes is an atheist. Concerning his religion, some insist that he is an atheist while others that he is a calvinist of the Anglican Church. Nobody can go into the inner thoughts of the author of Leviathan. In this case, it is important to take into consideration of what he himself said.
Hobbes affirms that God exists and created the world and governs it by the Providence. So, he is not an atheist. But at the same time we cannot help admitting that his 'God' and 'Providence' are different from those interpreted by the Church. So he is, by definition, a heretic. And for this reason he considered himself to be true christian.
The actual Christianism must have dissatisfied him. For it is hardly compatible with his materialism, natural religion and civil religion. His religious thought is something that can evolve easily into the atheism, and is already criticized to be atheistic. We can justly doubt of his saying that he is not atheist, because it was dangerous to declare himself an atheist at that time. Did he hide his real conscience? It is possible, but nobody can be sure of it.
Hobbes apparently is not an atheist. Nevertheless he was ahead of his time in that he favored the atheism. Moreover, He influenced Spinoza and Rousseau to elaborate the pantheism, and baron d'Holbach to proclaim the atheism in the times of the Enlightenment. So it can be said that the author of Leviathan is in spite of himself on the list of the atheists.
Hobbes affirms that God exists and created the world and governs it by the Providence. So, he is not an atheist. But at the same time we cannot help admitting that his 'God' and 'Providence' are different from those interpreted by the Church. So he is, by definition, a heretic. And for this reason he considered himself to be true christian.
The actual Christianism must have dissatisfied him. For it is hardly compatible with his materialism, natural religion and civil religion. His religious thought is something that can evolve easily into the atheism, and is already criticized to be atheistic. We can justly doubt of his saying that he is not atheist, because it was dangerous to declare himself an atheist at that time. Did he hide his real conscience? It is possible, but nobody can be sure of it.
Hobbes apparently is not an atheist. Nevertheless he was ahead of his time in that he favored the atheism. Moreover, He influenced Spinoza and Rousseau to elaborate the pantheism, and baron d'Holbach to proclaim the atheism in the times of the Enlightenment. So it can be said that the author of Leviathan is in spite of himself on the list of the atheists.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 자연종교
3. 시민종교
4. 무신론과 이단
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
무신론 시대에 기독교대학 채플에서 하나님 이해 설교의 가능성 모색
대학과 복음
2003 .12
-
THE PROBLEM OF ATHEISM
신학전망
1972 .03
-
홉스의 이성 개념 고찰 : 『리바이어던』의 “어리석은 사람” 논의를 중심으로
철학논총
2012 .04
-
홉스의 무신론과 폼포나치의 자연주의
철학논총
2007 .07
-
신무신론의 현상과 종교성에 관한 기독교교육적 고찰
기독교교육 논총
2017 .01
-
홉스에서의 이성, 국가 그리고 '정치적인 것'
동서인문학
2012 .12
-
홉스, 여성, 계약 — 사회계약론에 여성이 있는가?
인문논총
2019 .01
-
홉스의 인간이해와 국가
철학
1991 .11
-
셸리의 무신론에 관한 이해
동서인문학
2013 .12
-
신무신론자 4인에 관한 비판
창조론오픈포럼
2019 .02
-
대중이란 무엇인가: 홉스와 스피노자의 정치사상 비교
영국 연구
2006 .01
-
Thomas Hobbes의 國家論에 대하여
역사와 담론
1973 .09
-
과학적 무신론의 도전과 창조론의 미래
선교와 신학
2019 .06
-
홉스의 『리바이어던』에 나타난 힘의 문제 : 자연적 힘과 정치적 힘의 관계를 중심으로
철학탐구
2009 .11
-
무신론 시대의 종교성 : 종교다원주의 이후 믿음의 주체
종교연구
2013 .03
-
과학적 무신론의 형성 과정에 관한 소고 : 공산주의 유물사관과 진화론의 결합 과정을 중심으로
창조론오픈포럼
2014 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002872001