지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article deals with the topic of how a party programmatic system is constituted and tries to explain the factors that have a positive or negative influence on the process of developing a party programmatic system through the example of three Russian parties. As the additional research object―besides the Russian Communist Party and Jabloko, which have represented the two ideological counterparts in the Russian partisan spectrum―the party of power 'United Russia' is also analysed as a new and important factor that is significantly changing the political character of the Russian party system. The process of developing a party program is analysed through four variables, including party genesis, form of interaction between intraparty factions, approach to administrative resources and interparty competition strategy. The four variables are chosen from the aspect of neoinstitutionalism, which considers party programming as an institution in the forming process, in which the actor is not only influenced by the institution but also constitutes the institution . The rational, strategic and goal-oriented behavior of the actors is, therefore, one of the most important constructive factors in institutionalization. This theoretical viewpoint is especially useful in the analysis of transitional societies, where actors constitute new institutions.
The results of this analysis show the different approaches to development between the three parties and, in particular, the dynamic and unstable character of a programmatic constitution. The Russian Communist Party, formed as a relatively strong ideologyoriented party, is transforming to a catch-all party with a wide interpretative programmatic system. Jabloko was an elite party with a broad ideological orientation and a loose organization but it has acquired more of an ideological character since the middle of the 90s. The two parties share a commonality in that they have maintained their ideologic profile. In contrast to these two parties, a United Russia has the possibility to mobilize material and personal administrative resources and, therefore, has more of the character of a patronage party. The complex and dynamic character of party building might be maintained through the process of institutionalization of the Russian party system. This is even more likely if a party with strong administrative support like United Russia dominates the Russian party system more and more, as it would be more apt to stay a long period, specifically in the context of the authoritative political culture in Russia.
The results of this analysis show the different approaches to development between the three parties and, in particular, the dynamic and unstable character of a programmatic constitution. The Russian Communist Party, formed as a relatively strong ideologyoriented party, is transforming to a catch-all party with a wide interpretative programmatic system. Jabloko was an elite party with a broad ideological orientation and a loose organization but it has acquired more of an ideological character since the middle of the 90s. The two parties share a commonality in that they have maintained their ideologic profile. In contrast to these two parties, a United Russia has the possibility to mobilize material and personal administrative resources and, therefore, has more of the character of a patronage party. The complex and dynamic character of party building might be maintained through the process of institutionalization of the Russian party system. This is even more likely if a party with strong administrative support like United Russia dominates the Russian party system more and more, as it would be more apt to stay a long period, specifically in the context of the authoritative political culture in Russia.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 합리적 선택 신제도주의적 분석
Ⅲ. 러시아정당체제와 이념적 스펙트럼의 변동
Ⅳ. 정당이념과 네 가지 변수
Ⅴ. 러시아 정당의 이념형성과 유형분류
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
Oates, Sarah , 1998 , Towards a Definition of the Russian Political Spectrum
Ostrow, Joel M , 2000 , Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures
Rehberg, Karl-Siegbert , 1997 , Institutionenwechsel und die Funktionsver？nderung des Symbolischen
Siegert, Jens , 2006 , Über die Zukunft liberaler Politik in Russland 06
Ju, Jin-Sook , 2004 , Konstituierung der Programmatik russischer Parteien
Ostrow, Joel M , 2000 , Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures
Rehberg, Karl-Siegbert , 1997 , Institutionenwechsel und die Funktionsver？nderung des Symbolischen
Siegert, Jens , 2006 , Über die Zukunft liberaler Politik in Russland 06
Ju, Jin-Sook , 2004 , Konstituierung der Programmatik russischer Parteien
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Party
Korea Journal
1983 .10
-
The Role of Political Parties
Korea Journal
1963 .09
-
21세기 한국, 20세기와의 결별 가능성 : 10·26 선거 및 정치질서 변동을 보는 한 가지 시선
역사비평
2011 .11
-
유럽 극우정당의 현황과 득표율 연구
민족연구
2009 .01
-
파티플래닝(Party Planning)의 속성에 대한 탐색적 분석과 고객들의 인지도 비교
한국식생활문화학회지
2004 .01
-
러시아의 “권력당”과 한국의 집권여당 비교연구 : 강력한 대통령제 아래에서 친정부 정당의 조직과 행동패턴
슬라브학보
2007 .06
-
Party Politics in Korea
Korea Journal
1966 .02
-
Development of Party Politics in Korea
Korea Journal
1968 .12
-
Development of Parties and Politics in Korea (Ⅱ)
Korea Journal
1974 .10
-
Development of Parties and Politics in Korea (Ⅰ)
Korea Journal
1974 .09
-
1950년대 후반 자유당 개헌 논의의 내용과 성격
역사와현실
2011 .06
-
제1차 경제개발 5개년 계획 기간의 소련 공산당 세포조직의 발달 : 레닌그라드 공장 당 세포조직을 중심으로
슬라브학보
2002 .12
-
Historical Development of Party Politics in Korea
Korea Journal
1967 .06
-
Political Parties and Diplomatic Policy
Korea Journal
1967 .06
-
Political Parties and Party Politics in Korea
Korea Journal
1967 .06
-
朝鮮後期 黨派譜 硏究(2) ― 南譜
대동문화연구
2016 .01
-
1945년 한국민주당 초기 조직의 성격과 주한미군정 활용
역사와현실
2011 .06
-
日本からみたマレーシアの政治的安定性と政党間関係 : 「ヘゲモニー政党制」への移行
일본문화연구
2006 .10
-
근현대 중국의 공화정치와 국민국가의 모색
역사학보
2008 .12
-
1956년 대선과 민주당-진보당 야당연합
역사비평
2012 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-309-018824629