지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis analyzes the activities of Voitinsky in Shanghai during the period of May 1920-Dec. 1920 from the two perspectives of internationalism and socialist coalition. Before this period, the revolutionary movements in East Asia had proceeded sporadically and unsystematically. It was only at the time of early 1920 that the Russian Communist Party began in earnest to unify those various East Asian revolutionary movements into one organizational control. The sending of Voitinsky, an agent of Vladivostok bureau of the RCP, to Shanghai was one example of this embarking of the RCP. The ultimate purpose of Voitinsky's mission at that time was to establish a central organ to unify the revolutionary movements of Korean, Japanese and Chinese that had been interactive in Shanghai.
In order to find out the historical meaning of Voitinsky's mission and his activities in Shanghai during this period, the following two approaches are employed. First, it will be focused on the relationship between Voitinsky and Korean communists that was manifested especially in building of the temporary 'East Asian Secretariat' in Shanghai. This analysis strikingly reveals the rise and fall of Shanghai as a center of revolutionary movements in East Asia. The history of 1920 in Shanghai with Voitinsky actually serves as a good example to show a turning point of internationalism in East Asian revolutionary movements. Taking the side of Jinsun Park, not Voitinsky, the Comintern rejected the latter's request to build the 'East Asian Secretariat' but appointed Jinsun Park as a plenipotentiary exerting the full authority to control the revolutionary movements in East Asia. This decision of the Com intern illuminates internationalism innate in itself at that time. Since January 1921, not Voitinsky's 'East Asian Secretariat,' but Park's 'East Asian Communist Party' had emerged as a leading organ directing Shanghai to a new center of the revolutionary movements in East Asia.
Second, this thesis will examine the peculiar effort of Voitinsky to unify various socialist forces while focusing on the establishment of the Chinese Communist Group under his 'East Asian Secretariat.' The activities of Voitinsky during this period distinguished itself as consolidating various revolutionary forces into the ideological framework of socialism. The printing house of his 'East Asian Secretariat' was used not only by Korean, Chinese and Russian revolutionaries but also by Vietnamese, and supported publishment of various kinds of radical ideas including anarchism.
In order to find out the historical meaning of Voitinsky's mission and his activities in Shanghai during this period, the following two approaches are employed. First, it will be focused on the relationship between Voitinsky and Korean communists that was manifested especially in building of the temporary 'East Asian Secretariat' in Shanghai. This analysis strikingly reveals the rise and fall of Shanghai as a center of revolutionary movements in East Asia. The history of 1920 in Shanghai with Voitinsky actually serves as a good example to show a turning point of internationalism in East Asian revolutionary movements. Taking the side of Jinsun Park, not Voitinsky, the Comintern rejected the latter's request to build the 'East Asian Secretariat' but appointed Jinsun Park as a plenipotentiary exerting the full authority to control the revolutionary movements in East Asia. This decision of the Com intern illuminates internationalism innate in itself at that time. Since January 1921, not Voitinsky's 'East Asian Secretariat,' but Park's 'East Asian Communist Party' had emerged as a leading organ directing Shanghai to a new center of the revolutionary movements in East Asia.
Second, this thesis will examine the peculiar effort of Voitinsky to unify various socialist forces while focusing on the establishment of the Chinese Communist Group under his 'East Asian Secretariat.' The activities of Voitinsky during this period distinguished itself as consolidating various revolutionary forces into the ideological framework of socialism. The printing house of his 'East Asian Secretariat' was used not only by Korean, Chinese and Russian revolutionaries but also by Vietnamese, and supported publishment of various kinds of radical ideas including anarchism.
#보이틴스키
#한인사회당
#코민테른 동아비서부
#볼세비키 망명객
#상하이
#동아시아 공산주의 운동
#사회주의
#무정부주의
#국제주의
#코민테른
#Voitinsky
#Korean Socialist Party
#Comintern's East Asian Secretariat
#Bolshevik refugee
#Shanghai
#Far Eastern communist movements
#Socialism
#Anarchism
#Internationalism
#Comintern
#维经斯其
#韩人社会党
#共产国际东亚秘书处
#上海
#布尔什维克 亡命者
#极东工产主义运动
#社会主义
#无政府主义
#国际主义
#共产国际
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 보이틴스키 이전 상하이지역 러시아 볼셰비키들의 모습
Ⅲ. 보이틴스키와 상하이지역 초기 공산주의 운동
Ⅳ. 나가며
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
보이틴스키의 중국 방문과 ‘社會主義者同盟’ - 중국공산당 창립 시기 아나키즘,볼셰비즘 합작과 분열 -
중국사연구
2005 .01
-
코민테른의 1924년 2월 결정서 연구
한국사학보
2015 .02
-
동아시아적 관점에서 생각하기
역사비평
2014 .11
-
고려공산당 창립대표회 준비위원회의 성립
역사학보
2015 .03
-
동아시아 역사상, 그 구축의 방식과 윤곽
역사학보
2008 .12
-
현행 〈동아시아사〉 교과서의 불교사 서술의 문제점과 개선 방안
역사교육
2019 .09
-
초기 베트남 공산주의운동의 국외 네트워크와 재외활동가, 1928-1934
동양사학연구
2004 .09
-
한국 동아시아담론의 현재와 미래 : ‘동아시아공동체론’을 중심으로
통일인문학
2015 .09
-
동아시아 국가에서 세계화와 타자의식
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2002 .06
-
동아시아론의 전개와 역사 텍스트 속의 동아시아
역사교육
2007 .06
-
[DEBATE on Asian Values (2)] East Asian Economic Development : Cultural vs. Historical Perspectives
Korea Journal
2001 .06
-
〈동아시아사〉 교과서의 기술 내용과 개선 방안 : 2012년판 〈동아시아사〉 전근대 부분을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2013 .06
-
동아시아 공동체의 가능성과 시민사회
사회와 철학
2006 .04
-
[원문] Seasonal Migration in Modern Shanghai
로컬리티 인문학
2013 .04
-
The Perception of East Asian Countries on the Russian Far East : “Asian Ocean and Marine Folk-customs”, Mokpo National University, 20~23 November, 2003
도서문화
2004 .06
-
동아시아 공동체와 스토리텔링
중국소설논총
2010 .01
-
〈동아시아사〉 과목의 신설과 교육과정 개발
역사교육
2013 .12
-
유럽정체성과 동아시아공동체 담론
역사학보
2014 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-912-018646835