지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Principle of no tax without representation is basic doctrine in the field of tax laws. It means the people shall be liable to taxation according to the law. It is prescribed in article 38, and 59 of the Korean Constitution. The constitution also proclaimed "Equality of the people under the law" in article 11. The principle of equality of tax burden is derived from this article. This principle is closely related to the principle of no tax without representation because the principle of no taxation without representation is able to be substantially realized through the principle of equality of tax burden. This principle means equal distribution of tax burden among taxpayers according to one's ability to pay tax. The principle consist of horizontal equality and vertical equality in taxation.
However, in the past, the constitutional court decided that aggregate taxation of assets income(interest, dividend, rent) on husband-wife as a tax unit was against article 36 ① of the constitution. And recently it also decided that aggregate taxation of house and land on household as a tax unit was against the same article. Article 36 ① prescribes that the nation is liable to protect marriage and family life based on dignity of human beings and equality of man and woman.
This study is focused on analyzing the factors that constitutional court adopted in judgement of the two cases.
These cases are to be considered under the article 11, not under the article 36 ① of the constitution. And it is also considered that rational basis of taxation on husband-wife or households as a tax unit are existed. Equality of tax burden among husband-wife and households, adequate redistribution of income, aid to local finance, stabilization of price of land and house are considered to be rational basis in taxation of asset income and aggregate real property on husband-wife or households as a tax unit.
However, in the past, the constitutional court decided that aggregate taxation of assets income(interest, dividend, rent) on husband-wife as a tax unit was against article 36 ① of the constitution. And recently it also decided that aggregate taxation of house and land on household as a tax unit was against the same article. Article 36 ① prescribes that the nation is liable to protect marriage and family life based on dignity of human beings and equality of man and woman.
This study is focused on analyzing the factors that constitutional court adopted in judgement of the two cases.
These cases are to be considered under the article 11, not under the article 36 ① of the constitution. And it is also considered that rational basis of taxation on husband-wife or households as a tax unit are existed. Equality of tax burden among husband-wife and households, adequate redistribution of income, aid to local finance, stabilization of price of land and house are considered to be rational basis in taxation of asset income and aggregate real property on husband-wife or households as a tax unit.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 부부(세대)단위의 과세와 공평부담의 원칙
Ⅲ. 부부(세대)단위의 과세에 대한 논점
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
현행소득과세제도와 조세공평주의
법학연구
2007 .06
-
No Taxation without Representation Principles
한국경영교육학회 학술발표대회논문집
2014 .06
-
The Discrepancy between Statutory Tax and Real Tax Burden : The Case of Korea
Korea and the World Economy
2009 .04
-
소득세 과세단위의 선택과 관련한 조세정책적 고려와 조세법적인 고려
조세학술논집
2008 .02
-
지방세법상 토지과표의 개선방안
법학연구
2005 .12
-
보유과세강화가 조세부담의 형평성에 미치는 효과
한국지방재정논집
2003 .12
-
해외 부동산투자와 조세문제
조세학술논집
2007 .02
-
관세법상의 가산세에 관한 사례연구
관세학회지
2004 .02
-
조세의 위임입법에 관한 고찰
외법논집
2006 .01
-
현행 종합부동산세의 내용과 그 문제점
조세법연구
2006 .07
-
출국세 도입에 대한 헌법적 검토와 입법 형태에 관한 연구
조세학술논집
2014 .10
-
국세기본법과 지방세기본법의 통합과 체제 개편에 관한 연구
아태비즈니스연구
2018 .01
-
세계화, 조세경쟁, 그리고 한국사회의 분배갈등구조
아세아연구
2006 .09
-
移轉稅制 개편 논의와 시사점에 대한 고찰 : 미국의 유산세 폐지와 우리 나라의 포괄주의 증여과세를 중심으로
강원법학
2009 .06
-
중소기업 조세지원제도의 유효성 분석
국제회계연구
2002 .11
-
부동산보유세 부담의 국제비교연구와 그 시사점
조세학술논집
2006 .02
-
추계과세와 관련한 최근의 판례 동향의 분석
조세학술논집
2009 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018463627