지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
I try to newly comprehend comparatively old themes on the establishment of Eastern vs. Western party in the year of 1575 from the socio-economic views. I found out some new facts through this research. That is, the economic situation in the late reign of King Myeongjong and the early reign of King Seonjo, or the mid and late 16th century, had gotten worse and fallen down to collapse of Joseon Dynasty. This conclusion was very different from the dominant views that the economic growth had been continued all through the 16th century.
The second, I tried to figure out the political characteristics of the Sarim Faction(士林派) by checking out their reformation issues after they grabbed political power in King Seonjo reign. I verified the Sarim Faction divided into the conservative group which tried to resist against any reformations and the progressive group which intended to construct new state through strong reformation oriented policy. At that time, reformation issues were divided into the way of ‘enlightening people(敎民)’ which focused on enlightenment campaign to the people led by Sajok(士族) or Neo-Confucian elites and the way of ‘raising people(養民)’ which people had to be rich by operating state's system and institutes.
The ‘enlightening people’ group was comparatively radical because they tried to exclude the state's roll as a factor of reformation, but the ‘raising people’ group was pretty moderate because they acknowledged the state had their own roll to normalize the dynasty. While the radical group gathered to the Easterners in the process of reformation, the moderate group cooperated with the Westerners, or the Conservatives. Two groups fought very fiercely each other to get political initiatives. The political system of Eastern and Western party was established through this conflict in the early reign of King Seonjo, 1575.
I finally checked out the roll of King Seonjo at this political dispute. King Seonjo was never progressive person for whom many Sarim faction strongly anticipated to accomplish reformation saving the state, which was sunken to the deep sea with many chronic misleading factors by kings such as Yeonsan-gun, Jungjong, Myeongjong, and the Meritorious faction(Hun-gu Faction; 勳舊派). He had rather conservative opinions not to reform the state like the Conservatives. Due to his reluctance to the state's reformation, most of all reformations the progressive Sarim faction or Easterners eagerly drove to normalize the state were failed. At that result, Joseon dynasty confronted state's crisis not to be controlled at all by a King or officials as like King Myeongjong and his court already experienced before.
The second, I tried to figure out the political characteristics of the Sarim Faction(士林派) by checking out their reformation issues after they grabbed political power in King Seonjo reign. I verified the Sarim Faction divided into the conservative group which tried to resist against any reformations and the progressive group which intended to construct new state through strong reformation oriented policy. At that time, reformation issues were divided into the way of ‘enlightening people(敎民)’ which focused on enlightenment campaign to the people led by Sajok(士族) or Neo-Confucian elites and the way of ‘raising people(養民)’ which people had to be rich by operating state's system and institutes.
The ‘enlightening people’ group was comparatively radical because they tried to exclude the state's roll as a factor of reformation, but the ‘raising people’ group was pretty moderate because they acknowledged the state had their own roll to normalize the dynasty. While the radical group gathered to the Easterners in the process of reformation, the moderate group cooperated with the Westerners, or the Conservatives. Two groups fought very fiercely each other to get political initiatives. The political system of Eastern and Western party was established through this conflict in the early reign of King Seonjo, 1575.
I finally checked out the roll of King Seonjo at this political dispute. King Seonjo was never progressive person for whom many Sarim faction strongly anticipated to accomplish reformation saving the state, which was sunken to the deep sea with many chronic misleading factors by kings such as Yeonsan-gun, Jungjong, Myeongjong, and the Meritorious faction(Hun-gu Faction; 勳舊派). He had rather conservative opinions not to reform the state like the Conservatives. Due to his reluctance to the state's reformation, most of all reformations the progressive Sarim faction or Easterners eagerly drove to normalize the state were failed. At that result, Joseon dynasty confronted state's crisis not to be controlled at all by a King or officials as like King Myeongjong and his court already experienced before.
목차
Ⅰ. 선조대 정국 이해와 관련한 몇 가지 관점들
Ⅱ. 위기의 확산
Ⅲ. 개혁 노선의 충돌
Ⅳ. 동ㆍ서 붕당체제의 출현
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
선조대 ‘동서분당’ 전개의 초기 양상 : 이이를 중심으로
민족문화
2014 .06
-
16세기 王妃 家門의 變遷과 性格
한국사상과 문화
2011 .01
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
All Believers Are Prophets: Social Spirituality for the Third Reformation
신학과 철학
2017 .01
-
호남지역 서원의 지역적 특성과 정치적 성격 : 나주 경현서원을 중심으로
국학연구
2007 .12
-
선조 대 당쟁의 양상과 전개 양상 : 이이를 중심으로
장서각
2012 .10
-
고려 충혜왕의 행적과 정치적 입장
한국인물사연구
2010 .03
-
종교개혁 기념에 대한 역사 : 1617년, 1717년, 1817년, 1917년 종교개혁 기념을 중심으로
신학논단
2016 .09
-
Joseon Kings’ Personal Belief in Buddhism and its Political Significance
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2011 .03
-
특집:원간섭기 유교지식인의 사상적 지형/원간섭기 사회현실과 개혁론의 전개
역사와현실
2003 .09
-
종교 개혁과 사회 개혁 : 사회 변동의 영향사 측면에서
신학연구
2016 .12
-
고려시대 정치사의 시각과 방법론 연구
역사와현실
2007 .12
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
-
선조 초반의 정국과 학문적 대응— 이황과 기대승을 중심으로 —
한국사상과 문화
2015 .01
-
18세기 조선 정치사상과 그 전후 맥락
역사학보
2012 .03
-
고려 말~조선 전기 ‘정치 세력의 이해’ 다시 보기
역사비평
2017 .08
-
新羅 哀莊王代의 政治變動과 金彦昇
한국고대사연구
2004 .06
-
조선시대 왕의 이중적 재현 : 인조대를 중심으로
한국학연구
2012 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018333263