지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Historical studies dealing with the Goryeo dynasty’s politics have been using methods and consulting methodologies that were similar to those which have been used in studying the history of politics of the Joseon dynasty. Scholars in this area of studies tended to view the political situations of the past, as variations of conflicts that had taken place between political powers, like viewing them as various forms of confrontations that continued between the ruling authority of the Kings and the political agendas of the vassals.
Yet the political right(status) of the vassals or the authority of the prime ministers are yet to be explained with enough clarity. And the Korean scholars’ determination to overcome the historical opinions created by the Japanese scholars during the Japanese occupation period are actually preventing the scholars studying Goryeo politics from overcoming(more like escaping from) the frame of analysis that had been used by the Japanese.
Viewing a specific situation as a case of confrontation between two opponents can be quite useful in providing clear interpretation of the nature of that political conflict in the political history of that specific time period. Yet the environment that has sustained and supported the continuation of such perspective among Korean scholars was no other than the cold war mentality that has continued to define the political climate of the Korean peninsula. And the end of the cold war status is requiring us to develop a new perspective and also a new frame of analysis for the political historical studies.
One of the issues that have been deemed most importantly in the historical studies of Goryeo dynasty’s politics was no other than the ‘country(nationality)’. For a long time, people have placed a lot of value upon achievements such as successfully battling invading foreign forces or escaping other country’s oppression and intervention. Historical studies on the scale of ‘country’ and ‘state’ have occupied the highest level of meaning so far. Yet this kind of research methodology is not the most effective one in exploring the individuals’ political lives, and the political nature of the everyday life(which refers to the human trait of maintaining the present status-quo, based upon one’s self-created habits composed of individual experiences). Studies of past (political) reforms should be able to elaborate upon the nature of such ‘ordinaries’.
Also, broader discussions should be arranged to define the nature of political factions more correctly. People in the past who even shared same birth-related backgrounds and social classes did not necessarily became members of the same political faction. Reasons that made them display different kinds of political activities should be explained. Historical studies of the Goryeo dynasty politics are facing new challenges, with the advent of the 21st century.
Yet the political right(status) of the vassals or the authority of the prime ministers are yet to be explained with enough clarity. And the Korean scholars’ determination to overcome the historical opinions created by the Japanese scholars during the Japanese occupation period are actually preventing the scholars studying Goryeo politics from overcoming(more like escaping from) the frame of analysis that had been used by the Japanese.
Viewing a specific situation as a case of confrontation between two opponents can be quite useful in providing clear interpretation of the nature of that political conflict in the political history of that specific time period. Yet the environment that has sustained and supported the continuation of such perspective among Korean scholars was no other than the cold war mentality that has continued to define the political climate of the Korean peninsula. And the end of the cold war status is requiring us to develop a new perspective and also a new frame of analysis for the political historical studies.
One of the issues that have been deemed most importantly in the historical studies of Goryeo dynasty’s politics was no other than the ‘country(nationality)’. For a long time, people have placed a lot of value upon achievements such as successfully battling invading foreign forces or escaping other country’s oppression and intervention. Historical studies on the scale of ‘country’ and ‘state’ have occupied the highest level of meaning so far. Yet this kind of research methodology is not the most effective one in exploring the individuals’ political lives, and the political nature of the everyday life(which refers to the human trait of maintaining the present status-quo, based upon one’s self-created habits composed of individual experiences). Studies of past (political) reforms should be able to elaborate upon the nature of such ‘ordinaries’.
Also, broader discussions should be arranged to define the nature of political factions more correctly. People in the past who even shared same birth-related backgrounds and social classes did not necessarily became members of the same political faction. Reasons that made them display different kinds of political activities should be explained. Historical studies of the Goryeo dynasty politics are facing new challenges, with the advent of the 21st century.
목차
머리말
1. 권력구조의 기초연구
2. 정치세력은 어떻게 보았을까?
3. 정치운영과 정책론
맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
18세기 조선 정치사상과 그 전후 맥락
역사학보
2012 .03
-
Political Thought in Korea
Korea Journal
1978 .10
-
Political Culture and Political Development in Korea : An Aspect of the Political Behavior of Low-Income Groups in Seoul
Korea Journal
1978 .01
-
Political Development in Korea : 1945-1965
Korea Journal
1965 .09
-
Political Development and the Direction of Political Science Education in Korea
Korea Journal
1978 .01
-
E-politics와 한국 정치문화
한국민족문화
2006 .10
-
고구려 정치사의 연구 현황과 과제
한국고대사연구
2003 .09
-
Понять Россию:особенности политической культуры России
슬라브학보
2002 .06
-
Political Thought behind Korean National
Korea Journal
1976 .04
-
Korean Political Parties and Political Development : Crucial Elections and the Process of Institutionalization of the Political Party System
Korea Journal
1978 .01
-
호남지역 서원의 지역적 특성과 정치적 성격 : 나주 경현서원을 중심으로
국학연구
2007 .12
-
정치와 비-정치의 경계
철학
2009 .08
-
북한 정치 교육의 내용과 실태 분석
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2001 .03
-
Korea and Comparative Political Studies
Korea Journal
1983 .03
-
여성정치 참여의 어제와 오늘: 역사적 흐름 및 핵심 개선과제를 중심으로
민족연구
2011 .01
-
网络政治参与对中国政治环境的影响分析
중국학
2014 .01
-
러시아의 정치적 갈등 시민의 정치적 태도 유형에 따른 반정부시위의 변화 분석
슬라브학보
2014 .03
-
율곡 『聖學輯要』의 성왕론 - 『大學衍義』, 『聖學十圖』와 비교를 중심으로
율곡학연구
2019 .01
-
1930년대 육군특별지원병제의 성립사 연구
한일관계사연구
2018 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-016210256