지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In order to develop a better understanding of the three Northeast Asian countries and to establish a desirable relationship between them, history textbooks, which is the main compass used for secondary level history education at the national level, should be compiled in an exact manner. Nevertheless, the historical descriptions and perceptions contained in the 2005 version of the New History Textbook put out by Husosha publishers contains even more distortions than the previous edition. As a result, the level of distrust and conflict between the three countries has been raised to new heights.
The New History Textbook published by Husosha publishers has employed the geopolitically-motivated Hanbando wihy?pron (Korea as a dagger in the heart of Japan) theory to justify Japan's invasion of the Korean peninsula, which the book argues was carried out to maintain Japans independence during the process of building a modern state. The Hanbando wihy?pron is a theory that argues that Japan's security would be threatened if Korea were to fall into the hands of one of its enemies. Therefore, as this theory runs the risk of instilling students with the belief that Korea and China are potential threat to Japan's security rather than viewing them as neighboring countries with whom friendly ties should be established, the descriptions of history based on this theory should be removed.
Based on this notion of the Hanbando wihy?pron, the New History Textbook, emphasizes that while China and Russia intended to conquer the Korean peninsula since the onset of the modern era, Japan supported Koreas efforts to modernize itself and reorganize its military system. The textbook also claims that Japan helped prevent Korea from being invaded by other foreign powers in order to assure Japans own security. In addition, the textbook not only tries to cover up or justify the Russo-Japanese and Sino-Japanese Wars on the grounds that they were justified defensive actions, it even glorifies these wars.
The perception of history hidden within the Husosha textbook reflects Japan's desire to remilitarize and remove the sense of guilt which has long served to restrain the Japanese.
There is no way that future relations between the three Northeast Asian countries can be maintained in a positive manner if such distorted perceptions of history are allowed to take roots among the future generations of Japan. In this regards, the three countries should strive to establish a shared perception of history that can contribute to actualizing peace and prosperity in the region.
The New History Textbook published by Husosha publishers has employed the geopolitically-motivated Hanbando wihy?pron (Korea as a dagger in the heart of Japan) theory to justify Japan's invasion of the Korean peninsula, which the book argues was carried out to maintain Japans independence during the process of building a modern state. The Hanbando wihy?pron is a theory that argues that Japan's security would be threatened if Korea were to fall into the hands of one of its enemies. Therefore, as this theory runs the risk of instilling students with the belief that Korea and China are potential threat to Japan's security rather than viewing them as neighboring countries with whom friendly ties should be established, the descriptions of history based on this theory should be removed.
Based on this notion of the Hanbando wihy?pron, the New History Textbook, emphasizes that while China and Russia intended to conquer the Korean peninsula since the onset of the modern era, Japan supported Koreas efforts to modernize itself and reorganize its military system. The textbook also claims that Japan helped prevent Korea from being invaded by other foreign powers in order to assure Japans own security. In addition, the textbook not only tries to cover up or justify the Russo-Japanese and Sino-Japanese Wars on the grounds that they were justified defensive actions, it even glorifies these wars.
The perception of history hidden within the Husosha textbook reflects Japan's desire to remilitarize and remove the sense of guilt which has long served to restrain the Japanese.
There is no way that future relations between the three Northeast Asian countries can be maintained in a positive manner if such distorted perceptions of history are allowed to take roots among the future generations of Japan. In this regards, the three countries should strive to establish a shared perception of history that can contribute to actualizing peace and prosperity in the region.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 지정학적 관점에 입각한 한반도 ‘팔뚝’(위협)설 조장
Ⅲ. 일본의 한국독립 보존 및 근대화 후원 강조
Ⅳ. 한국침략 은폐 및 전쟁 미화
Ⅴ. 맺음말
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한ㆍ일 중학교 역사교과서의 근대사 서술 분석 : 한ㆍ일 관계를 중심으로
계명사학
2008 .11
-
일본 중학교 역사교과서 근현대사 (1910년 이후) 서술과 역사관 분석 : 후소샤판 교과서의 ‘전쟁’ ‘식민지’ 관련 서술을 중심으로
한국사연구
2005 .06
-
일본 중학교 역사교과서의 중ㆍ근세사 서술과 역사인식 : 후소샤(扶桑社) 교과서를 중심으로
한국사연구
2005 .06
-
일본 중학교 역사 교과서(후소샤 版) 문제의 배경과 특징 : 역사기억의 왜곡과 성찰
한국사연구
2005 .06
-
역사교과서 문제의 교재화와 학습자의 인식
역사와 세계
2009 .06
-
일본 역사교과서 문제와 그 전망
한국사연구
2002 .03
-
한국교과서의 문제와 전망 : 근현대사를 중심으로
한국사연구
2002 .03
-
[총설] 최근의 한중관계사·한일관계사 연구의 쇄도와 새로운 동양사 연구 방향의 탐색
역사학보
2014 .09
-
교수요목기 중등 역사 검정 교과서의 발행 상황과 목록화
역사교육
2019 .09
-
『세계사』교과서 일본사 관련 서술의 현황과 전망 : 전근대사 서술을 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2017 .12
-
제 7차 교육과정 高等學校 國史敎科書의 내용 분석
역사교육
2002 .12
-
민족ㆍ국민사와 동아시아사의 접맥 : 동아시아의 역사인식 공유를 위한 모색
역사와실학
2007 .06
-
한국사 교과서 검정 파동의 원인과 과제
역사와현실
2014 .06
-
역사전쟁을 성찰하며 - 정사(正史) · 정통성(正統性)론의 함정
역사비평
2019 .08
-
동북아 시대에서 한국사 서술과 역사교육 : ‘국사’를 넘어서
역사교육
2005 .09
-
해방후 현대사 교육 내용 기준의 변천과 국사교과서 서술
역사학보
2010 .03
-
중국 중심의 동아시아사 : 청일전쟁 이후 中國 中小學 역사교과서를 중심으로
역사교육
2016 .09
-
제1차 교육과정기 발행 『중등국사』 (역사교육연구회 엮음) 교과서의 특성과 의의
역사교육
2018 .06
-
日本 古代史像의 형성과 敎科書 서술
역사교육
1999 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018333309