개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This assertion considered "Rejuhyungbo", which meant a law of propriety first and penalty supportive, regarding the relationship between constitution system and propriety system as a study for legal exchange history in East Asia. Thus, the actual circumstances and characteristics of the system based on proprieties were drawn by analyzing "Rejuhyungbo" in Tang and Goryeo.
The characteristics of Chinese law about proprieties and penalty were as the same relations as two wagon wheels and complementary each other. "Jure" represented itself the best about the relationships of the two and it was the basic administrative characteristic of systematic government organization under authoritarian bureaucracy centered on an emperor but it coexisted proprieties, politics, and penalty. To be extended with it, "Jure" was the system of combination of propriety and penalty and the foundation of "Rejuhyungbo". The basic formation of "Rejuhyungbo" as a characteristic of the law of Tang period was the result of the historical development.
"Jongbub" and status system based on courtesy of "Youga" were consisted of family system centered on the right of father and husband and national system centered on the right of king. The legislation of Tang period reflected on enough the propriety system. Thus, proprieties were consisted of the basic system of country and family and included both. Among the proprities, the representative one as a national system was "Sipak",which meant ten wrongdoing and status system. This law in the time period of Tang penetrated the system of "Rejuhyungbo" showed a head of "Jure".
The Goryeo dynasty that succeeded to law of Tang also accepted proprieties that was the principle of social integrating comparing with Japan. Among Goryeo laws, the direct law for proprieties was the laws related to religious ceremony, costume, finance and funeral. The other laws for bureaucracy and control of the mass of people among Goryeo laws could be found the same proprieties that showed in Tang laws. Thus, The Goryeo laws had a propriety system as a basis of traditional Chinese proprieties so that we can realize that the Goryeo laws was built on the system of "Rejuhyungbo".
"Sipok" was established in order to maintain a country and family system in the period of Goryeo. Thus, the propriety system was the basic system of nation and society in Goryeo. The status of "Yangin" and "Chunin" was determined according to a participation of propriety system and it showed that the propriety in the Goryeo dynasty controlled the daily lives of the mass of the people as a form of family system.
The characteristics of Chinese law about proprieties and penalty were as the same relations as two wagon wheels and complementary each other. "Jure" represented itself the best about the relationships of the two and it was the basic administrative characteristic of systematic government organization under authoritarian bureaucracy centered on an emperor but it coexisted proprieties, politics, and penalty. To be extended with it, "Jure" was the system of combination of propriety and penalty and the foundation of "Rejuhyungbo". The basic formation of "Rejuhyungbo" as a characteristic of the law of Tang period was the result of the historical development.
"Jongbub" and status system based on courtesy of "Youga" were consisted of family system centered on the right of father and husband and national system centered on the right of king. The legislation of Tang period reflected on enough the propriety system. Thus, proprieties were consisted of the basic system of country and family and included both. Among the proprities, the representative one as a national system was "Sipak",which meant ten wrongdoing and status system. This law in the time period of Tang penetrated the system of "Rejuhyungbo" showed a head of "Jure".
The Goryeo dynasty that succeeded to law of Tang also accepted proprieties that was the principle of social integrating comparing with Japan. Among Goryeo laws, the direct law for proprieties was the laws related to religious ceremony, costume, finance and funeral. The other laws for bureaucracy and control of the mass of people among Goryeo laws could be found the same proprieties that showed in Tang laws. Thus, The Goryeo laws had a propriety system as a basis of traditional Chinese proprieties so that we can realize that the Goryeo laws was built on the system of "Rejuhyungbo".
"Sipok" was established in order to maintain a country and family system in the period of Goryeo. Thus, the propriety system was the basic system of nation and society in Goryeo. The status of "Yangin" and "Chunin" was determined according to a participation of propriety system and it showed that the propriety in the Goryeo dynasty controlled the daily lives of the mass of the people as a form of family system.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 당 이전 ‘禮主刑(法)補’ 구조의 성립과 추이
Ⅲ. 唐ㆍ高麗의 율령제에 보이는 ‘禮主刑(法)補’ 구조와 특징
Ⅳ. 맺음말
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
本性으로서의 禮에 대한 一考察
한국사상과 문화
2016 .01
-
全齋 任憲晦의 禮學思想
한국사상과 문화
2004 .01
-
婚姻에 나타난 儒家的 特性
동양고전연구
2008 .01
-
孔子의 禮에 대한 解釋學的 接近 - 論語를 중심으로
동양고전연구
2007 .01
-
[고려] ‘인간의 삶’에 대한 다양한 관심, 그리고 무관심 : 2011년∼2012년 고려시대사 연구 동향
역사학보
2013 .09
-
인권 및 프라이버시와 유가철학의 규범체계로서 禮 사이의 통약가능성 문제
동양철학
2011 .01
-
賈誼禮論의 정신과 그 근거로서의 孟·荀종합적 인성론
대동문화연구
2010 .01
-
高麗·唐·日本의 律令身分制 연구 : 천인제를 중심으로
한국민족문화
2012 .05
-
고려전기 정부의 한인(漢人)인식과 내투(來投) 한인들의 행적
역사와현실
2012 .06
-
13∼14세기 요동 고려인 세력과 고려 왕실의 충돌
한국사연구
2018 .06
-
13~14세기 고려 지식인의 시대 인식과 정체성
역사와현실
2020 .03
-
日本における2018年改正相続法に関する考察
日本學硏究
2019 .01
-
高麗의 관료제 관련 법령에서의 唐令의 영향
중국고중세사연구
2012 .02
-
Listening to the Beat of Different Drums : Rituals, Music, and Ideology in Goryeo
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .12
-
주몽고려, 궁예고려, 왕건고려, 코리아의 단절과 계승
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
고구려와 고려의 역사적 계승 관계
한국고대사연구
2004 .03
-
12세기 초 국제 정세와 麗金 간의 전쟁과 외교
동북아역사논총
2011 .12
-
한국(韓國) 차례(茶禮)의 사적(史的) 고찰(考察) -제 1보 고려시대 이전-
한국식생활문화학회지
1990 .01
-
孟子의 禮論 硏究
중국학논총
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-019522173