지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.6
- 수록면
- 365 - 400 (36page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (7)
2008
2006
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As we have seen, I give an outline of the main provisions of UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications on Int'l Contracts and notable points on its application in practice, which already adopted, at sixtieth session of the General Assembly.
The conclusions are as follows:
As comments of the Chinese Government on the Draft Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in Int'l Contracts, UN Electronic Convention avoided, to the extent possible, interference of the domestic laws of a Contracting State, maintains the principle of party autonomy, does not deal with substantive subject of contact laws, like as the validity of contact and liabilities of concerned parties and also provisions of regulatory nature, avoids a dual regimes of contract law in same trade dealing with only special issues regarding to the use of electronic communications on the formation and performance of a contract. It also retains the principles of functional equivalence between paper form and electronic form and technological neutrality. Therefore, it is a stand-alone instrument regarding to legal recognition on electronic communications and can contribute to remove the legal obstacles to use of electronic communications exchanged under other int'l conventions.
But in the view of point from article 1, 19, 20, the convention give an excessively broad scope of application, which was unusual in int'l trade related instruments. So participation of the convention from a number of state might not be expected in consideration of strong disagreeing of singapore, Canada, France, China regarding to, in particularly, form requirements.
When the parties trade with the country, in particularly, like a Russia, they can meet its form requirement through the principle of party autonomy and then have to seek their own safety in the facilitation of convention because it was submitted that unrestricted party autonomy could undermine the entire convention and could permit parties to derogate from mandatory national laws.
The electronic convention definitely is a stand-alone instrument but when it is used in connection with the UNCITRAL instruments listed in article 20, paragraph 1, as far as electronic communications exchanged under the existing int'l conventions, it can do duty as, for example, e-CISG but if its use separates from them, it can not be maintained relationship with them like as relationship between e-UCP and UCP.
The conclusions are as follows:
As comments of the Chinese Government on the Draft Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in Int'l Contracts, UN Electronic Convention avoided, to the extent possible, interference of the domestic laws of a Contracting State, maintains the principle of party autonomy, does not deal with substantive subject of contact laws, like as the validity of contact and liabilities of concerned parties and also provisions of regulatory nature, avoids a dual regimes of contract law in same trade dealing with only special issues regarding to the use of electronic communications on the formation and performance of a contract. It also retains the principles of functional equivalence between paper form and electronic form and technological neutrality. Therefore, it is a stand-alone instrument regarding to legal recognition on electronic communications and can contribute to remove the legal obstacles to use of electronic communications exchanged under other int'l conventions.
But in the view of point from article 1, 19, 20, the convention give an excessively broad scope of application, which was unusual in int'l trade related instruments. So participation of the convention from a number of state might not be expected in consideration of strong disagreeing of singapore, Canada, France, China regarding to, in particularly, form requirements.
When the parties trade with the country, in particularly, like a Russia, they can meet its form requirement through the principle of party autonomy and then have to seek their own safety in the facilitation of convention because it was submitted that unrestricted party autonomy could undermine the entire convention and could permit parties to derogate from mandatory national laws.
The electronic convention definitely is a stand-alone instrument but when it is used in connection with the UNCITRAL instruments listed in article 20, paragraph 1, as far as electronic communications exchanged under the existing int'l conventions, it can do duty as, for example, e-CISG but if its use separates from them, it can not be maintained relationship with them like as relationship between e-UCP and UCP.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 유엔전자협약의 주요규정의 개요
Ⅲ. 유엔전자협약의 실무적용상의 유의점
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
UN전자계약협약에 관한 연구
중앙법학
2009 .12
-
UNCITRAL 전자계약협약의 국내법에의 수용
비교사법
2009 .06
-
유엔전자통신협약상의 최종규정에 대한 소고
경영경제
2009 .02
-
전자계약에 관한 예비협약초안상의 문제점과 대안
무역학회지
2003 .02
-
UNCITRAL 전자계약협약과 국제관할
과학기술법연구
2006 .01
-
전자계약에 관한 국제협약 초안상의 계약법리에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2003 .08
-
UNCITRAL 전자계약협약에 관한 비교법적 고찰과 전자거래기본법에의 영향
비교사법
2006 .12
-
전자계약에 관한 국제협약 초안의 주요내용과 특징에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2003 .05
-
국제계약에 있어 전자적 의사표시의 이용에 관한 UN협약의 규정해석과 적용에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2010 .02
-
UNCITRAL 계약협약상 전자계약의 성립에 관한 연구
전자무역연구
2007 .01
-
전자계약성립에 관한 연구 : UNCITRAL 예비초안협약을 중심으로
무역학자 전국대회 발표논문집
2002 .08
-
국제계약에서 전자커뮤니케이션 사용에 관한 유엔 협약초안과 전자거래기본법(개정안)에 관한 고찰
문화산업연구
2005 .06
-
2차 전자계약예비협약초안에 관한 연구
무역상무연구
2003 .05
-
전자통신에 관한 유엔 협약초안의 개요
경영경제
2005 .08
-
전자계약협약의 비교법적 고찰
전자무역연구
2007 .01
-
2차전자계약 예비협약 초안에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2003 .09
-
국제물품매매협약(CISG) 적용 하에서 매매계약 체결에 관한 실무적 고려사항
통상법률
2010 .08
-
國際去來에서 電子契約 成立의 障碍要因에 관한 硏究
통상정보연구
2003 .12
-
An Empirical Study on Convention Benefits and Future Convention Destination Environment : A Case Study of Busan, Korea
호텔경영학연구
2005 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-305-019544959