지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This these is to study the theory against Russo-Japanese War through the anti-war thought of Kotoku Shusui who led the early socialism in modern Japan. The focus on the analysis has two points. One is to understand Kotoku's anti-war thought and the change of his world view from early power politics to the criticism of imperialism in relation to the acceptance of socialism. The other is to pay attention to the limitation which his anti-war thought reveals in the process of recognizing Chosun.
Kotoku held the power political viewpoint about the politics home and abroad when he started his career at the field of journalism as a journalist. But he came to accept fully socialism due to Seijukai party set-up of 1900 and the Boxer Rebellion and firmed the position of socialist. At the same time, he publicly criticized the imperialism, which was reversed from his previous viewpoint. In Imperialism : the specter of the twentieth century published in 1901, Kotoku criticized patriotism and militarism which are factors of imperialism. And he insisted that the imperialism is propelled by a few of soldiers, politicians and capitalists, thus it just leads to the moral corruption, the gap between rich and poor and no benefit can be distributed to people.
His thought shown in the criticism of imperialism was followed by the thought against Russo-Japanese war breaking out three years later. His anti-war thought is based on the viewpoint of class that war may enrich a handful of soldiers, politicians and capitalists, but doesn't offer any benefit to common people including laborers and farmers. Emphasizing on the viewpoint of class so strongly, he held to expand economically to Chosun for the common people of Japan. As a result of it, he even committed an error lapsing into another imperialistic theory. After the war broke out, Kotoku insisted that capitalistic class should be completely abolished since they just provoke war.
Kotoku held the power political viewpoint about the politics home and abroad when he started his career at the field of journalism as a journalist. But he came to accept fully socialism due to Seijukai party set-up of 1900 and the Boxer Rebellion and firmed the position of socialist. At the same time, he publicly criticized the imperialism, which was reversed from his previous viewpoint. In Imperialism : the specter of the twentieth century published in 1901, Kotoku criticized patriotism and militarism which are factors of imperialism. And he insisted that the imperialism is propelled by a few of soldiers, politicians and capitalists, thus it just leads to the moral corruption, the gap between rich and poor and no benefit can be distributed to people.
His thought shown in the criticism of imperialism was followed by the thought against Russo-Japanese war breaking out three years later. His anti-war thought is based on the viewpoint of class that war may enrich a handful of soldiers, politicians and capitalists, but doesn't offer any benefit to common people including laborers and farmers. Emphasizing on the viewpoint of class so strongly, he held to expand economically to Chosun for the common people of Japan. As a result of it, he even committed an error lapsing into another imperialistic theory. After the war broke out, Kotoku insisted that capitalistic class should be completely abolished since they just provoke war.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 의화단사건과 제국주의 비판
Ⅲ. 러일전쟁 비전론
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동아시아 '계급연대론'의 기원 -고토쿠 슈스이의 직접행동론과 민족문제-
인문논총
2011 .01
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
The Korean War 1950-1953
Korea Journal
1967 .07
-
Trends in the Study of the Russo-Japanese War in Korea and Future Tasks : Third-party perspective on the origins of the war
International Journal of Korean History
2005 .02
-
日清、日露戦争期における日本キリスト教とその朝鮮認識に関する研究
일본문화연구
2014 .10
-
‘전쟁의 기억’과 ‘기억의 전쟁’ : 특별한 피난체험을 중심으로
통일인문학
2014 .03
-
전쟁과 폭력에 대한 기독교 현실주의적 이해
대학과 복음
2004 .12
-
우찌무라 간조(內村鑑三)의 비전론(非戰論)과 무교회 2세대
종교연구
2011 .06
-
냉전 초기 사회주의진영 내부의 전쟁·평화 담론의 충돌과 북한의 한국전쟁 인식 변화
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
재한 서구 개신교 선교사와 제1차 세계대전 : 「한국선교지(Korea Mission Field)」를 중심으로
신학연구
2014 .12
-
한국전쟁의 기본개념으로서 제한전(limited war)의 성립과 분화 : 한반도에 대한 전략적 가치 평가와 관련하여
한국사연구
2004 .06
-
한국전쟁 60년, 한반도와 세계
역사비평
2010 .05
-
한국 전쟁영화의 발전과 특징 : 한국전쟁에서 베트남전쟁까지
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .11
-
전쟁 기억과 전후 중일외교의 중층구조 - 전쟁종료문제의 인식과 해석의 어긋남 -
日本思想
2013 .01
-
The Korean War and Viewpoints of Korean Novels
Korea Journal
1981 .06
-
패전 직후 일본의 ‘평화교육’ 재음미
역사와 담론
2012 .10
-
The Strategy for One Korea, and the Third War
신학논단
1994 .06
-
망각의 공동체와 기억의 소설적 의미-황순원의 〈나무들 비탈에 서다〉 연구-
한국현대문학연구
2002 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
전쟁광을 겨냥한 비수 : 『나는 사회주의자다‐동아시아 사회주의의 기원, 고토쿠 슈스이 선집』 /임경화 엮고 옮김/박노자 해제/교양인/2011
정선태
황해문화
2011
.12
코토쿠 슈스이(幸德秋水)의 무정부주의 : '사회민주주의'에서 '아나키즘'으로 이행해가는 내면세계와 그 풍경
김석근
한국동양정치사상사연구
2008
.03
동아시아(한ㆍ중ㆍ일) 아나키즘의 비교
조세현
동북아 문화연구
2001
.10
근대 일본과 한국의 사회진화론과 아나키즘 연구 : 고토쿠 슈스이와 신채호를 중심으로
윤일
,
남송우
,
손동주
외 1명
동북아 문화연구
2008
.03
근대계몽기 국문번역과 동문(同文)의 미디어 : 『20세기의 괴물 제국주의』 한ㆍ중 번역본 연구
임상석
우리문학연구
2014
.07
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0