지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the United States, The federal False Claims Act permits a person with knowledge of fraud against the United States Government as the "qui tam plaintiff', to file a lawsuit on behalf of the Government. When private individuals file an action under the FCA, it is brought in the government's name. If the action is successful, the qui tam plaintiff is rewarded with a percentage of the recovery.
There is a heated controversy about the introduction of People's Action in Korea, which is similar to Qui Tam Action of the United States. Korean People's Action, which is studied by members of the National Assembly, would be broadly applicable to almost any situation where money of central government and central legal persons are involved. Objects and Categories of People's Action are general government expenditures, defense contracting, medicare fraud, education grants, and agriculture support programs etc. The greatest impact of People's Action maybe is in their deterrent effect. The qui tam lawsuits saved the Federal Government about $10 billion from 1986 to 1995 in the United States.
Rules of people's action must be prescribed as a separate law, so that all central government and other central legal persons respect it more positively. By people's action, The Supreme Court would control public policies better than past, but it shouldn't reduce administrative discretion too narrow.
Under this lawsuit system, I think that people must demand an administrative audit against illegal expenditure or illegal property management, before they file a people's action. By the administrative audit, administrative experiences and information can be used and excessive caseload of courts can be reduced.
Asian financial crisis in 1997 gave our society deep impact. We must build more powerful financial control system, so that moral hazard can be prevented.
There is a heated controversy about the introduction of People's Action in Korea, which is similar to Qui Tam Action of the United States. Korean People's Action, which is studied by members of the National Assembly, would be broadly applicable to almost any situation where money of central government and central legal persons are involved. Objects and Categories of People's Action are general government expenditures, defense contracting, medicare fraud, education grants, and agriculture support programs etc. The greatest impact of People's Action maybe is in their deterrent effect. The qui tam lawsuits saved the Federal Government about $10 billion from 1986 to 1995 in the United States.
Rules of people's action must be prescribed as a separate law, so that all central government and other central legal persons respect it more positively. By people's action, The Supreme Court would control public policies better than past, but it shouldn't reduce administrative discretion too narrow.
Under this lawsuit system, I think that people must demand an administrative audit against illegal expenditure or illegal property management, before they file a people's action. By the administrative audit, administrative experiences and information can be used and excessive caseload of courts can be reduced.
Asian financial crisis in 1997 gave our society deep impact. We must build more powerful financial control system, so that moral hazard can be prevented.
목차
Ⅰ. 정책법원과 국민소송의 도입필요성
Ⅱ. 미국의 허위청구방지소송(Qui Tam Action)
Ⅲ. 국민소송을 둘러싼 법적 쟁점들
Ⅳ. 요약 및 결론
부록 1. 국민소송과 주민소송의 주요법조문의 비교(사개추제출안)
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
미국 부정청구법제의 적용분야
미국헌법연구
2012 .04
-
‘Qui tam action’ 제도
법학연구
2004 .12
-
환경행정의 통제수단으로서의 주민소송의 역할 : 일본의 환경관련 주민소송 판례를 중심으로
공법학연구
2006 .11
-
미국의 관급계약에서 부정청구법제의 활용
미국헌법연구
2012 .08
-
주민소송의 도입과 그 과제
행정법연구
2004 .05
-
일본 행정사건소송법 개정 이후의 당사자소송의 운용 현황에 관한 고찰 - 판례의 경향을 중심으로 -
공법학연구
2020 .02
-
노조활동의 이해를 위한 또 하나의 개념적 틀 : 공조행동(Common Action)
대한경영학회지
2001 .09
-
내부고발자 보상제도에 관한 연구 - 미국 부정청구법제를 중심으로 -
치안정책연구
2013 .01
-
행정법에 있어서 사인의 소송 및 집행의 역할 (Ⅰ)
행정법연구
2019 .05
-
증권집단소송제도의 활성화를 위한 제안
법학연구
2014 .03
-
EU의 행정소송
법학연구
2007 .02
-
중국법상 行政審判機關의 終局裁決權과 그에 대한 評價
법학연구
2005 .12
-
증권관련집단소송제도 운영에 관한 제안 - 미국의 입법례 및 소송현황을 중심으로 -
기업법연구
2005 .12
-
행정의 행위형식으로서의‘행정계획’개념에 대한 검토－헌법재판소 2000. 6. 1. 선고, 99헌마538등 결정,대법원 1982. 3. 9. 선고, 80누105 판결 및 대법원 2002.10. 11. 선고, 2000두8226 판결에 대한 평석－
일감법학
2013 .01
-
미국의 의료비 부정청구 방지법제에 관한 고찰
미국헌법연구
2013 .04
-
미국의 집단소송제도의 기능과 한계: 역사적 분석
미국헌법연구
2014 .12
-
中国2014年《行政诉讼法》修正案的主要内容及未来发展
동북아법연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0